1 / 23

Law of Evidence

Law of Evidence. Oral Evidence. Oral evidence. Oral : spoken or uttered, distinct from written. Oral evidence : evidence given by word of mouth; the oral testimony of witness to prove the truth of the matter asserted. Competence of witness.

kwillis
Download Presentation

Law of Evidence

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Law of Evidence Oral Evidence

  2. Oral evidence • Oral: spoken or uttered, distinct from written. • Oral evidence: evidence given by word of mouth; the oral testimony of witness to prove the truth of the matter asserted

  3. Competence of witness • The competence refers to the ability , capacity or qualification of a witness to give evidence in a court of law.

  4. The general rule of competence • The general rule is that all persons are competent to testify unless the court considers that they are prevented from understanding the questions put to them or from giving rational answers to those questions by reason of: • tender years; • extreme old age; • disease whether body or mind.

  5. Competence in special cases • The accused • Deaf and dump • Husband and wife • Children of tender years • Accomplices (guilty associate)

  6. Compellability of witness • Compellability refers to the question whether or not a competent witness can be ordered by a court of law to give evidence. • The general rule is that all competent witnesses are compellable, that is, can be compelled to give evidence.

  7. Exceptions of compellability • The accused cannot be compelled to give evidence that incriminates himself. • Privilege of spouse • Privilege of court (unless ordered by supreme court) • Privilege of official communication and records • Privilege of information relating to commission of offences. • Privilege of legal professions

  8. Privilege of spouse • No person who is married or has been married may give evidence as against the other spouse, in regard to anything that has taken place during the existence of such marriage, even though themarriage has been dissolved for any reason, except: a) with the express consent of the Spouse; or b) in relation to any offence alleged to have been committed by the spouse against I) the person giving the evidence; ii) the ascendant or descendant of either of the spouses.

  9. Number of witness • In the most cases the law does not limit the witness a person can call to prove a certain fact. • In Islam the witness in Zina (adultery), the witness must be four in number. Also financial offence would be 2 witnesses. But the other hudud offences there is no specific number or kind fully agreed by fuqaha.

  10. Number of witness • The general rule is that evidence should be weighed not counted. However, the court has discretion to limit the number of witness.

  11. Proof of facts by oral evidence • The witness should testify under this conditions: • ability to observe(see/hear) • ability to remember • ability to communicate

  12. Examination of witness • Except as otherwise provided by law, a witness shall be examined: A) orally in open court B) In the presence of the accused C) Under oath or affirmation

  13. Oath and affirmation • ( I swear in the name of God to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth) • ( I solemnly declare that I will tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth)

  14. Stages and procedure in examination of witness • There are three stages of examination of witness: • examination-in-chief • Cross-examination • Re-examination

  15. Examination-in-chief means the examination of witness by the party that calls him. • Cross-examination means the examination of a witness by the party other than the party which calls him • Re-examination means examination of witness by the party who called him subsequent to the cross-examination

  16. Order of examination 1. A witness shall first be examined-in-chief; then, if the other party so desires, the witness may be cross-examined; then, if the party calling the witness so desires, the witness may be re-examined. 2. The examination-in-chief and the cross-examination shall relate to relevant facts but the cross-examination need not be confined to the facts which the witness testified to in his examination-in-chief.

  17. Order of examination 3. The re-examination shall be directed to the explanation of matters referred to in cross-examination; and if new matter is introduced, with the permission of the Court, ¡n re-examination, the other party may further cross-examine upon that matter.

  18. Leading question • Leading question means any question put to a witness in such a way as to suggest a reply that the party putting the question wishes or expects to receive • The leading question has two characteristics: • It suggests the answer desired • It assumes that existence of disputed facts as to which the witness is yet to testify

  19. Leading question 1. Leading questions shall not be asked in an examination in-chief or in a re-examination except with the permission of the Court. 2. The Court may permit leading questions in examination-in-chief and re-examination only as to matters which are introductory or undisputed or which have, in its opinion, been already sufficiently proved.

  20. Refreshing the memory of a witness • The witness in the course testifying in a court may refer to a document i.e., dairy, log book or account book, to refresh his memory. • Referring to a document is with the permission of the court, and the court will determine its admissibility

  21. Question lawful in cross-examination • When a witness is cross-examined, he may be asked any question which tends: A) to test his veracity B) to discover who he is and what is his position in life C) to shake his credit

  22. Impeaching the credit of a witness • The credit of a witness may be impeached by the party other than the party calling him or, with the consent of the court, by the party who has called him: • Evidence of persons that he is unworthy of credit • Interest or enemy • Former statement inconsistent with his evidence • Convicted by crime against modesty or honour

  23. The end Any question so far?

More Related