1 / 23

Agenda

Network Layer Security: Status Update Howie Weiss ( NASA/JPL/Parsons ) Bordeaux, France April 2013. Agenda . What is an “Adaptation Profile ?” CCSDS Network Layer Security IPSec+IKE Profile for CCSDS What is included? What is excluded? How is it used ? Testing.

kylee
Download Presentation

Agenda

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Network Layer Security:Status UpdateHowie Weiss(NASA/JPL/Parsons)Bordeaux, FranceApril 2013

  2. Agenda • What is an “Adaptation Profile?” • CCSDS Network Layer Security • IPSec+IKE Profile for CCSDS • What is included? • What is excluded? • How is it used? • Testing

  3. What is Network Layer Security? Space extensions to FTP Other Apps SCPS-FP FTP Features FTP Space extensions to the Socket Interface SCPS-TP “TCP Tranquility” options TCP Options TCP UDP Space-optimized IPSec variant IPSec SCPS-SP IKE Common Network- Layer Interface Space-optimized IP variant IP SCPS-NP Space Link Subnet: CCSDS Data Link

  4. Adaptation Profile • Email “conversation” with Tom Gannett: • “I will be launching off to write an adaptation profile soon.  Are there any worked examples of what this is within the CCSDS context?  Or at a minimum, is there a template for what it should look like?  Or is there Gannett advice on what to make it look like?” • “We have no templates, but Peter cites examples of his favorites in his boot camp slides (attached).  My advice is to make it look like a Blue Book (which it will be).” • “Ok - I'll take a look.  The intent was that it would be a blue book but I was wondering how it was to be structured.” • “Structure depends on content.  If you have an outline of what is to be included, I can make recommendations about structure.” • “So, do we just use the IETF RFC as a normative reference and have a section that says here's where we differ from the RFC?  Or do we have more "meat" and "detail?"  The major piece of this work is the set of options we choose to support - nothing else changes. • I would say certainly the former.  The less "meat" and "detail" in a Blue Book the better.”

  5. IPSec: one protocol, many options • Tunnel mode vs. transport mode • Default cipher suite (encryption + auth + mode) • Authenticated encryption? • Null encryption (authentication-only)? • ESP w/null encrypt or AH? • What would be allowed? • Anti-replay option • Keying and rekeying • Pre-placed keys? • IKE auto rekey • Automatic when keys expire – regardless of mission state? • Rekey “now” button?

  6. Issues to be resolved • Transport or tunnel mode or both? • Tunnel mode • ESP-only? AH-only? • ESP-only • ESP + AH? • No • Authentication-only w/o encryption allowed? (null encryption) • Yes • Authenticated Encryption or Encryption w/o auth allowed? • AEAD Yes, warning that encryption-only is unsafe • Keying and rekeying questions • Automated vs. manual • IKEv1 or IKEv2 • IKEv2 w/rekey commanding “button” • Push-to-rekey • Push-to-inhibit rekey • Manual keying allowed • SA lifetimes • Policy Management • Silent for now • Define default cipher suite(s) • Follow algorithm document + IKE & IPsec RFCs • Compression • Optional IPcomp

  7. Transport vs. Tunnel Mode • Transport Mode: • Single IP header • End-to-End mode (writer-2-reader) • Not generally used commercially • Tunnel Mode: • Dual IP headers – entire IP packet is encapsulated • Allows Gateway-to-Gateway mode • Allows IPSec to be outboard in security gateways • E.g., commercial VPNs • Recommendation for CCSDS: • Tunnel Mode

  8. IPSec is TWO Protocols • AH: IP Authentication Header (RFC 4302) • connectionless integrity • data origin authentication. • optional replay protection • No confidentiality • ESP: Encapsulating Security Payload (RFC 4303) • confidentiality, • data origin authentication, • connectionless integrity, • anti-replay protection (w/automated key management), • limited traffic flow confidentiality. • Provides encryption-only service for confidentiality • Provides integrity-only service • Provides confidentiality + integrity service

  9. AH Packet Format AH (IP protocol 51) total length 152 bytes AH Authenticated (108 bytes)

  10. ESP w/Null Encryption ESP (IP protocol 50) total length 152 bytes ESP Header ESP Trailer ESP Auth ESP Authenticated (132 bytes)

  11. ESP w/AES-GCM ESP (IP protocol 50) total length 160 bytes Encrypted (128 bytes) ESP Header ESP Trailer ESP Auth ESP Authenticated (140 bytes)

  12. ESP w/AES-GCM + AH AH (IP protocol 51) total length 184 bytes AH Authenticated (148 bytes) Encrypted (128 bytes) ESP Header ESP Trailer ESP Auth ESP Authenticated (140 bytes)

  13. ESP and/or AH ? • AH does not support confidentiality • ESP supports both confidentiality and integrity • Supports null encryption • AH was designed because of export control issues regarding encryption algorithms • AH and ESP can be nested but why? • Too much overhead • Recommendation for CCSDS: • ESP-only

  14. Security Services Allowed • Authentication-only mode • CCSDS Recommendation: allow • Needed for commanding w/o need for confidentiality • Authenticated Encryption mode • CCSDS Recommendation: allow (must) • Encryption w/o authentication is shown to be a dangerous practice • Non-authenticated Encryption mode • CCSDS Recommendation: unsafe, not recommended • Operational overhead and mission risk analysis may have need for this but it should not be done without analysis

  15. Keying • Conformant IPSec must support BOTH automated and manual keying • Automated keying: Internet Key Exchange • Manual keying: ad-hoc (each implementation determines how) • Issues regarding automated keying: • Rekey at “bad” time in the mission timeline • E.g., critical burn maneuver • E.g., critical upload/download • Requires little human intervention • Issues regarding manual keying: • “simple” but requires human resources • Physical distribution and protection required

  16. Internet Key Exchange (IKE) • IKE v1 (RFC 2409) • Complicated, robust protocol • Commercially widely used • IKE v2 (RFC 4306) • Simpler than IKEv1 (maybe safer…) • Commercially not widely used, yet. • Requires on-board flight code • More flight code to certify • But do it once and reuse, reuse, reuse

  17. IKE Operation • IKE rekeys when thresholds are met, for example: • Number of bytes transmitted • Elapsed time • For space, IKE Rekey-Upon-Command is needed • E.g., button-push to rekey • E.g., button-push to inhibit rekey • For space, timers will have to be tweaked vs. commercial (terrestrial) implementations • Recommendation for CCSDS: • IKEv2 w/rekey commanding “button” • Push-to-rekey • Push-to-inhibit rekey rekey

  18. Manual Keying • Sometimes simple is enough…. • Need ability to preload keys (e.g., 512 keys, 1024 keys) onboard • Maybe have a key upload ability? • Command to change keys • Preload and manage Security Associations (SA) • Recommendation for CCSDS: • Require manual key w/management (testing, ground checkout) 110010110010011100110110

  19. Policy Management • IPSec supports policies, e.g.: • Security services on a connection • Access controls for connection • No standards for loading, updating, supporting IPSec policies • SNMP-based approaches: • RFC 4807: IPSec Security Policy Database Configuration MIB • IPSec Security Policy IPSec Action MIB (IETF draft) • IPSec Security Policy IKE Action MIB (IETF draft) • Microsoft IPSec Policy Agent Service • KeyNote, ipsecconf, proprietary, etc • What do we want to do?

  20. Cipher Suite • Follow CCSDS Algorithms document • 128-bit key size • AES • AES-GCM for authenticated encryption • AES-CMAC, AES-GMAC, HMAC for authentication/integrity

  21. Compression • Overhead vs. Bandwidth! • IPSec adds overhead • Everyone complains about not having enough bandwidth • IP Payload Compression Protocol (IPComp) (RFC 3173) • Commercially supported • Compresses IP datagrams BEFORE security processing on outbound • Decompresses IP datagrams AFTER security processing on inbound • Recommendation for CCSDS: • Optional use of IPComp

  22. Summary • IPSec: ESP-only • Null encryption allowed • Authenticated encryption • Non-authenticated encryption unsafe • IKEv2 w/rekey button • Manual keying w/management • Policy management needed - ? • Cipher suites follow algorithms blue book • Compression (IPComp)

  23. Testing • New policy: when adding a new Blue Book project all resources including testing must be included. • Call to Working Group for testing volunteers: • NASA Glenn Research Center has volunteered. • Any others?

More Related