170 likes | 346 Views
Understanding Information Technology System Project Failure. By: Michael Bury MIS 4-22-10. Abstract. Over the last 20 years failure has become synonymous with Information Systems (IS) Projects. This research is aimed to understand the reasons for IS project failure.
E N D
Understanding Information Technology System Project Failure By: Michael Bury MIS 4-22-10
Abstract • Over the last 20 years failure has become synonymous with Information Systems (IS) Projects. • This research is aimed to understand the reasons for IS project failure. • IS project failure does not occur in any single industry and can happen anywhere at anytime. • IS Failure is not caused by just tech failures but organizational and functional problems in a business. • 20 Critical Success Factors (CSF) are introduced that are vital to the success of a project.
Introduction • Case Studies chosen from the last fifteen years from Ireland, UK, and USA will act as examples to show that IS project failure can occur anywhere and anytime. • Four case studies of Information System development are analyzed (Taurus, DIABHS, ISIS, and NATS)
Information System (IS) • Serves to coordinate the work of different organizational functions and is the core of any business. • Aims to increase efficiency and effectiveness of business practices. • Implementation of an IS involves the design, delivery, and use of the software systems in the organization. • Information Technology (IT) is the enabling tool that powers the IS. IT is used by IS.
Defining an Information System • The authors Definition: “An Information system is composed of software, hardware, communication systems, and people. It is a critical investment for organizational survival. It increases the efficiency and effectiveness of daily business by integration organizational processes and structures”
Analysis of CSF • Most occurring qualities of Successful systems: -On time, under budget. -Project Delivers its functionality. -Clear Vision & Objectives -Executive Management Support
Understanding IS Project Failure • 70% of large-scale IS investment fail. • Project must meet a number of objectives and goals. • Important parameters to meet will be: -Return on Investment -Profitability -Competition -Market Ability
Defining Project Failure • Author believes in a degree of failure.
Levels of Failure • Level one is considered minor. Final IS project does still meet its objectives and is completed. • Level two failure is major. IS project does not meet all requirements and will not be achieved within budget and one time. • Level three is critical failure. IS project odes not meet any of its requirements and objectives. Most likely to be scrapped after running over time and budget.
Case Studies • Two of the four case studies resulted in failure (Taurus and ISIS) • Two cases succeeded (DIABHS and NATS)
Taurus • Develop an automated transaction settlement system for the London Stock Exchange. • Electronics submission would enable the securities Industry to eliminate paper transactions. • Project began in 1998. • Aim to create a simple system for large investment houses.
Design and Implementation • An 18-month time frame was demanded for completion. • Involvement of new and untested technology and project complexity made this deadline nearly impossible. • The Design Stage initially scheduled for two months lasted two years. • Lack of Leadership and the spread of ownership steered project toward failure.
Design and Implementation (Continued) • Decision was made to use off-the-shelf software to speed up development cycle. • The software was nearly 20 years old. • The use of state of the art technology and software on hardware that was twenty years old was illogical. • Project team believed that building the outward part of the system first would make interested parties happy.
Outcome • Original budget = £6 Million • Ending budget = £800 • Main factors due to failure of project were identified as power, politics, and responsibility. • The persistence to deny failure dragged the project on and is identified as a socio-economic problem rather than technological. • Lack of Leadership and Management had detrimental effect on the project/project team. • Taurus project was labeled a project 3 failure because the majority of the CSF were not achieved.