70 likes | 310 Views
GOST status. draft-ietf-smime-gost-0 0 .txt. Sections concerning GOST-R-3410-94 and GOST-R-3410- 2001 encryption merged into one, as there was no real difference between them. Same happened to corresponding ASN modules. The meaning of ASN fields such as ukm explained. What's New.
E N D
GOST status draft-ietf-smime-gost-00.txt
Sections concerning GOST-R-3410-94 and GOST-R-3410- 2001 encryption merged into one, as there was no real difference between them. Same happened to corresponding ASN modules. The meaning of ASN fields such as ukm explained. What's New
Added missing references to [CMS] and Russian digital signature law [RFDSL] Added a paragraph in security considerations concerning [RFDSL] requirement not to use the same key for signing documents and encrypting data …
Russ’s comments: some of them are already taken care of in this draft, some will be fixed in next version, and some issues are still unresolved. Some things authors would like to add Authors need more comments What Has to Be Done
First issue is the reference to CPALGS. [ This referenced document is a big problem. It needs to be an international standard, a national standard, or an RFC. I suspect that it will be easier for you to make it an informational RFC. ] Russ’s Comments
Second issue is ASN modules. Draft currently uses [X.680] version of ASN.1, there is some work to do to switch to [X.208-88], which is used by smime workgroup. There were 6 modules in the previous draft. Too many. This version has 5, and some of them can still be merged. Russ’s Comments
This draft uses draft-leontiev-cryptopro-cppk-00.txt, which requires much work. In the next version, there should be a separate section about encryption parameters in detail. Other issues