1 / 35

Topic Selection and Submission 1

Topic Selection and Submission 1. Caps 4360.18 Dr. Brian William Smith. Office Hours. Today 10-2 Tomorrow 11-2 Friday 10-12. Learning Outcomes Covered Today.

kyrie
Download Presentation

Topic Selection and Submission 1

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Topic Selection and Submission 1 Caps 4360.18 Dr. Brian William Smith

  2. Office Hours • Today 10-2 • Tomorrow 11-2 • Friday 10-12

  3. Learning Outcomes Covered Today • Define an appropriate and current problem that is being actively discussed by real decision makers at a specific level of government.

  4. Social Problem vs. Social Policy

  5. Examples: • Social Problem • Immigration • Failing Public Schools • National Debt • Global Warming • Controversial Solution • Dream Act • Race to the Top • Fair Tax • Cap and Trade

  6. A Good topic has a social problem, with a solution, and decision makers are actively trying to solve it

  7. Topic Proposals • Due in Class on 1/28/2013 • Paper must be typed • Be Ready to make some changes (for the better)

  8. Do I have a good topic? • Clearly Identified Social Problem • Policy history on my topic • Legitimate Controversial Policy Solution • Pro and Con Sides

  9. Submission 1

  10. Submission One – 10% • Paper One consists of 2 parts: • Research Proposal (worksheet) • Annotated Bibliography

  11. Research Proposal • Worksheet. • Overview ONLY! • Do not go into depth. • Get the arguments right! • In prose form, this becomes the introduction to Submission Two.

  12. Sub 1: Annotated Bibliography • Basically a feasibility study • Requires 14 sources total, pro- and con- • Books, scholarly articles, legitimate websites and government resources • No “helper” sources (limited journalistic sources and magazines allowed, but NO Wikipedia, NO Taking Sides or Controversial Issues citations etc.) • Include: MLA Works Cited plus “annotations” (comments on each source’s authority, and on how you will use each source) • Due on February 13th

  13. How Many Sources • 14 Total • 7 for the Pro Side • 7 For the Con Side • These should be solid/authoritative sources

  14. Good vs. Bad • Good • Scholarly journal articles • Government documents • Reputable newspapers • Webpages of influental groups • Bad • Wikipedia • Private Individuals with webpages • Non-influential groups • Trade publications (People, Esquire)

  15. Annotation involves 2 things • Develop a standard MLA citation for each entry • Summarizing each source • Why it is credible • How it will contribute to your project

  16. Recap • Submission One = Annotated Bibliography + Research Proposal (worksheet) • Research Proposal is revised for the introduction to Submission Two and subsequent submissions. Save the information to put in your Research File

  17. Talking the Talk, is just as important as walking the walk Capstone vocabulary

  18. TOPIC QUESTIONThe title of your project (and your papers) • Concern about what should be done about a specific social problem (i.e., a normative question) • Answers imply a policy, so be specific • Lets use a hypothetical: Should the Federal Government approve the Keystone pipeline?

  19. POSITION • One specific answer to topic question • Particular stance on topic • Yes, the federal government should approve the Keystone Pipeline • No, the federal government should not approve the Keystone Pipeline

  20. SIDES • Identify all who share a position using shortcuts (efficient) • Tell readers • Opponents and Proponents • Side A and Side B • Pro Dream Act, and Anti Dream Act • Avoid generalizations

  21. STAKEHOLDERS • “Who holds each position?” • Important actors with a vested interest • Environmental Groups • Labor Unions • Oil Companies • Politicians

  22. GENERAL STAKEHOLDERS (aggregate data) • Broad types of people who have taken a specific position • Qualify as precisely as possible (some, many, %’s) • Not all of one type of people ever take one position (e.g. All Dems or Reps)

  23. SPECIFIC STAKEHOLDERS (Individual Data) • These are real actors • “Leading the charge” for a given side • Specific individuals or named groups • Mitt Romney, Former Presidential Candidate • Nancy Pelosi, Former Speaker of the House

  24. ISSUES • Broad concerns that the sides are arguing over • No opinionated language • Generally sides “share” issues • Usually 4-5 issues per controversy

  25. ARGUMENTS • Gives the OPINION of the side (which includes all the parties to the controversy) about each specific issue • Each side may have several arguments about each issue • Each argument should relate back to the side’s position.

  26. EVIDENCE • What each side uses to SUPPORT its arguments • Can include: • Statistical information • Case studies • Expert testimony

  27. PLANS/ACTIONS • “What are the sides doing to insure their position is the one in force?” • Practical, concrete actions • Examples: developing proposals lobbying working with electoral system at all levels using the media

  28. EXAMPLES OF PLANS/ACTIONS • Pro-Keystone: • working with lobbyists • electing sympathetic candidates • mobilizing supporters • Anti-Keystone • conducting studies to delay • media campaigns • electing sympathetic candidates

  29. VALUES • Beliefs about what is good and desirable, or what is undesirable and to be avoided • All parties on a side hold all values

  30. REVIEW • Topic question = the clearly stated controversy • Positions = possible answers to the topic question • Stakeholders = describes who takes each position • General = broad types of people • Specific = named groups or individuals who are leaders on each side

  31. REVIEW, cont. • Issues = Concerns that the sides are arguing over • Arguments = opinions of each side related to each issue • Evidence – what a side gives to support each argument

  32. REVIEW, cont. • Plans = Concrete actions taken to insure that the side’s position is the one in force • Values = beliefs about what is right and wrong

  33. REVIEW EXAMPLE • Topic question: Should the Federal Government approve the Keystone pipeline? • One position: No, the federal government should not approve the pipeline • Side Nickname: opponents

  34. REVIEW EXAMPLE, cont. • General Stakeholders on opponents side: Environmental Groups, some Democrats; etc. • Specific Stakeholders on opponents side: Sierra Club, President Obama

  35. REVIEW EXAMPLE, cont. • Opponents side’s plans: electing Democrats, delaying through studies. • Opponents side’s underlying values: The environment, safety, reduced dependence on oil

More Related