1 / 11

Anselm of Canterbury (1033-1109)

Anselm of Canterbury (1033-1109). Ontological Argument. Background. 1. A priori 2. Valid Argument 3. Reductio ad Absurdum. A priori. A priori is an epistemological concept. It says something about how we come to know a claim. It is opposed to a posteriori. A priori.

lacey
Download Presentation

Anselm of Canterbury (1033-1109)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Anselm of Canterbury (1033-1109) Ontological Argument

  2. Background 1. A priori 2.Valid Argument 3. Reductio ad Absurdum

  3. A priori • A priori is an epistemological concept. • It says something about how we come to know a claim. • It is opposed to a posteriori.

  4. A priori • A claim is a priori if and only if it is known through reason alone. • No experience is necessary for verifying the truth of the claim. • The truth of the claim can be determined simply by intellectual insight.

  5. Examples of a priori claims • “2+2=4” • All definitions are a priori. • “A square has four sides.” • “A bachelor is an unmarried man.”

  6. Valid • A valid argument: if the premises of the argument are true, then the conclusion follows necessarily. • A valid argument is an argument with perfect structure. • The structure of the argument is such that the conclusion follows necessarily from the premises. • In a valid argument it is logicallyimpossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion to be false. • So, if you accept the premises, then you MUST accept the conclusion.

  7. ValidArguments: Examples Argument 1 1) If p then q 2) p 3) Therefore, q Argument 2 1) Either p or q 2) q is false 3) Therefore, p is true.

  8. Reductio ad absurdum • This is a valid argument that uses the strategy of beginning by assuming the opposite of what you intend to show and deriving a contradiction.

  9. Example of reductio ad absurdum Let us imagine you want to proof that “you are home” 1) If it is not the case that I am home (or if it is false that I am home), then my car would not be outside. 2) My car is outside. 3) Therefore, I am home.

  10. Rationalism • Knowledge is derived from reason • Knowledge is apriori • Plato • Augustine • Anselm • Descartes • Spinoza • Leibniz

  11. Empiricism • Knowledge is derived through the senses • Aristotle • St. Thomas • Aquinas • Locke • Berkeley • Hume

More Related