160 likes | 281 Views
Perkins Compliance. Preparing for a compliance review. Monieca West ADHE Federal Program Manager October 19, 2012. Compliance reviews. Annual Compliance. Supplemental Monitoring. As needed Need based on risk Risk determined by points Grant size Coordinator tenure Unused funds
E N D
Perkins Compliance Preparing for a compliance review Monieca West ADHE Federal Program Manager October 19, 2012
Compliance reviews Annual Compliance Supplemental Monitoring As needed Need based on risk Risk determined by points Grant size Coordinator tenure Unused funds Reimbursement patterns Programmatic deadlines Amendment patterns Improvement plan status Other compliance areas • Annual • Routine • Focus • Program • Fiscal • Accountability
Adhe authority PERKINS SEC. 122. STATE PLAN. • (c) Plan Contents- The State plan shall include information that-- • (11) provides assurances that the eligible agency will comply with the requirements of this Act and the provisions of the State plan, including the provision of a financial audit of funds received under this Act which may be included as part of an audit of other Federal or State programs STATE PLAN • Annual on-site compliance/technical assistance • Risk management plan
FINANCIAL GOVERNANCE AUTHORITIES • The Carl D. Perkins CTE Actof 2006 • EDGAR(Education Department General Administrative Regulations) • OMBCirculars (Office of Management and Budget) • A-87—Cost Principles for State and Local Governments • A-21—Cost Principles for Postsecondary Educational Institutions • Arkansas Perkins State Plan for Career and Technical Education • Arkansas Department of Higher Education Policy Defaults to the most restrictive
Compliance review checklist www.adheperkins.com/forms.html
REVIEW ELEMENTS • I. Program Review • II. Fiscal Review • III. Accountability/Program Improvement Review • IV. Other Information/Technical Assistance • V. Activities Review • VI. Summary/Exit Interview
i. PROGRAM REVIEW • Personnel interviewed: • Review how Perkins supports or is integrated into institution’s CTE improvement activities, including institutions requirement for addressing Required Use of Funds. • Review how activities are selected for Perkins funding. • Review how data is used to determining activity selection and clearly defining CTE goals. • Review how special populations and nontraditional students are supported. • Review how institution links with secondary programs for seamless transition from high school to college. • Review how professional development is funded and targeted. • Review how institution assesses effectiveness of Perkins funded activities. • Review consortia issues or concerns, if appropriate. • Verify current AA page. • Verify current PoS documentation. • Review organization and management of Perkins programs and records.
ii. FISCAL REVIEW • Personnel interviewed: • Review financial management system as related to Perkins, including quarterly reconciliation. • Review PARs on file for Perkins funded positions. • Review documentation of admin funds, including Indirect Cost Rate Letter, if appropriate. • Review Perkins inventory management system and physical check of selected items. • Review selected expenditures (Annual Plan approval through Request for Reimbursement). • Review Supplemental Review areas of concern. ___ Unused Funds ___Late reports ___Results ___Amendments ___Tenure
iii. ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEW • Personnel interviewed: • Review collection and reporting of Special Populations information. • Review collection and reporting of Technical Skills Assessment results. • Review how Perkins performance results are used on campus. • Review historical results and future year targets. • Review progress on Improvement Plans, if appropriate.
iv. OTHER/TECH ASSISTANCE • Areas for future technical assistance • Questions/Concerns • Perkins going forward
v. ACTIVITIES REVIEW • Review progress to date (interview person responsible for implementing activity) • Review assessment method tracking • Review End of Year Program Report from previous year, including professional development impact
vi. Summary/exit interview • Review progress to date (interview person responsible for implementing activity) • Review assessment method tracking • Review End of Year Program Report from previous year, including professional development impact • Perkins reauthorization update.
Post review • Compliance review summary drafted. • If there are findings, coordinator is given a chance to review. • Report uploaded to Portal and coordinator notified. • Written Compliance Review Report provided to president/chancellor.
Preparing for visit • Review the checklist and anticipate the discussions. • Have appropriate staff available. • Perkins Team representation • Business office • Lead person for each funded activity • Have Perkins documents available. • Financial documents • Inventory records and access arranged • PARs • Program of Study documentation • Indirect cost rate letter • Improvement plan progress
questions Monieca.west@adhe.edu brinda.berry@adhe.edu