110 likes | 196 Views
Paying for Investments in Children. Isabel Sawhill October 21, 2008. Trends in Federal Spending on Children. Total real spending increased 1.4% 2004-2008. Compares to 12.2% for all spending Discretionary spending declined by 6.7% Entitlement spending increased by 5.7%
E N D
Paying for Investments in Children Isabel Sawhill October 21, 2008
Trends in Federal Spending on Children • Total real spending increased 1.4% 2004-2008. Compares to 12.2% for all spending • Discretionary spending declined by 6.7% • Entitlement spending increased by 5.7% • “The 45-year trend of declining investments in children as a share of the federal budget has continued unabated during the past five years.” First Focus, 2008, p. 6,Children’s Budget 2008
Advocates for Children Must: • Avoid wishful thinking • Re taxes • Re a war dividend • Re health care savings • Forge a bipartisan compromise • Invest new resources in children linked with… • Reform of entitlements
Why This Makes Sense • Elderly better off than in the past • Younger families struggling • The miracle of compound interest • We can protecting vulnerable groups • Reframe debate around life cycle view
Select Comparative Statistics for the Elderly and Non-Elderly
Source: Isabel V. Sawhilll, “Paying for Investments in Children,” in Big Ideas for Children: Investing in Our Nation’s Future, ed. First Focus (Washington, D.C.: First Focus, 2008).
The Miracle of Compound Interest Source: http://www.moneychimp.com/calculator/compound_interest_calculator.htm See Appendix A, Chart 3.
Conclusion • Must make cost-effective investments • Must protect the vulnerable elderly and phase in any reform gradually But ….. • A nation that gives priority to its elderly over its children doesn’t have much of a future.