1 / 8

Today’s Issue

Today’s Issue. Is more choice always better? How much choice is too much? Should the Exchange manage the number and type of products on its store shelves?. The Affordable Care Act – Statutory Requirements. Requires coverage of essential health benefits

Download Presentation

Today’s Issue

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Today’s Issue • Is more choice always better? How much choice is too much? • Should the Exchange manage the number and type of products on its store shelves?

  2. The Affordable Care Act – Statutory Requirements • Requires coverage of essential health benefits • Limits actuarial value to the precious metals (Bronze, Silver, Gold, Platinum) and a catastrophic plan • Sources of variation • Allows coverage of additional benefits • Does not prescribe cost-sharing designs

  3. Potential Benefits of Standardization • Make comparisons easier • Improve consumer decision-making • Enhance competition  improve quality and reduce price • Limit insurers’ ability to use benefit design to select risk • Medicare Advantage: some plans imposed higher copayments for costly treatments like chemotherapy • Increase participation in the Exchange

  4. Improving Decision-Making • The chocolate experiment • Participants who had limited choice were significantly more satisfied with their chocolate • Medicare Part D • Consumers frequently choose plans that provide less risk protection at higher cost • Medicare Advantage • CMS: “The large number of MA plan options…has made it difficult and confusing for beneficiaries to distinguish between these plans and to choose the best option to meet their needs.” • Plans must be “meaningfully different”

  5. Enhancing Competition • Swiss health insurance: “inertia due to numbers” • People offered more choices were less likely to switch plans • Nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office: Exchanges can enhance competition and reduce premiums by allowing consumers to compare standardized products

  6. Increasing Participation in the Exchange • 401(k) retirement savings plans • As the number of fund options increases, employee participation falls • Proctor & Gamble • Reduction in the number of shampoo products increased sales

  7. Potential Risks of Standardization • Products that are not in line with consumer preferences • Exchange could conduct market research, and review options annually • Could stifle innovation that promotes value • “Value-based insurance design” – lower cost-sharing for cost-effective services • “Provider tiering” – vary cost-sharing for providers based on their performance

  8. Question for Discussion • Should the Exchange have authority to standardize plan designs? • CA legislation: “The board shall have the authority to standardize products to be offered through the Exchange.”

More Related