170 likes | 595 Views
Effektstyring ved hjælp af kerneårsagsanalyse. Hvorfor?. Logisk model. implementeringsteori. forandringsteori. Kilde: Australske evalueringsforsker Patricia Rogers. University of Arizona, College of Public Health Ralph Renger Ph.D. Associate Professor renger@u.arizona.edu.
E N D
Logisk model implementeringsteori forandringsteori Kilde: Australske evalueringsforsker Patricia Rogers
University of Arizona, College of Public Health Ralph RengerPh.D. AssociateProfessor renger@u.arizona.edu
Kerneårsagsanalyse (ATM-modellen)* – antagelserne kommer frem * Amerikanske evalueringsforsker Ralph Renger
Trin 1 - Kerneårsagsanalyse Årsag 3 Årsag 4 Årsag 2 Årsag 1 Problem der kan omformuleres til formål Hvorfor Hvorfor Hvorfor Hvorfor Kilde: Renger, Ralph og Carolyn Hurley (2006): ”Lessonslearned in the application of the ATM approach to developinglogic models”, i Evaluation and Program Planning, 29, 106-119
Trin 2 - Fokusere indsatsen Kilde:Renger, Ralph og Carolyn Hurley (2006): ”Lessons learned in the application of the ATM approach to developing logic models”, iEvaluation and Program Planning, 29, 106-119
Identificere samarbejdspartnere Kilde: Renger, Ralph og Carolyn Hurley (2006): ”Lessons learned in the application of the ATM approach to developing logic models”, iEvaluation and Program Planning, 29, 106-119
Trin 3 - Opstille indikatorer Kilde:Renger, Ralph og Carolyn Hurley (2006): ”Lessons learned in the application of the ATM approach to developing logic models”, iEvaluation and Program Planning, 29, 106-119
Spændende artikel Astbury, Brad og Frans L. Leeuw (2010), ”Unpacking Black Boxes: Mechanisms and Theory Building in Evaluation”, i: American Journal of Evaluation, 31(3), 363-381.
Sociale indsatser kan være enkle, komplicerede og komplekse Kilde: Patton, Michael Quinn (2011): Developmental Evaluation: Applying Complexity Concepts to Enhance Innovation and Use.The GuilfordPress