120 likes | 216 Views
WEBI Working Group. IETF 50, Minneapolis Co-Chairs: Mark Nottingham Ian Cooper mnot@akamai.com icooper@equinix.com. Agenda. Agenda bashing [5 min or more] WEBI Group Status Recap of other groups (what WEBI is not) [10 min]
E N D
WEBI Working Group IETF 50, Minneapolis Co-Chairs: Mark Nottingham Ian Cooper mnot@akamai.com icooper@equinix.com
Agenda • Agenda bashing [5 min or more] • WEBI Group Status • Recap of other groups (what WEBI is not) [10 min] • WCIP; “do’s and don’ts”, Dan Li [20 min] • RUP requirements (MUSTs, SHOULDs, MAYs) [30 min] • Use cases • Scope (invalidation vs. update) • Initial protocol support? • IDD requirements (MUSTs, SHOULDs, MAYs) [20 min] • Use cases • Scoping and issues (CDI/OPES boundaries) • Wrap-up [10 min]
Agenda Bashing • Any Other Business?
WEBI Status • San Diego – got consensus, discussed areas of interest • Requirements Drafts – rough requirements, gathering use cases • Minneapolis – evaluate efforts based on requirements and use cases, determine support, next steps.
Recap of Web-Related Groups • OPES: introduce a processing model into intermediaries • CDI: inter-CDN communication model • WEBI: general intermediary-enabling mechanisms. Provides services for other groups as well.
WCIP: Do’s and Don’ts Dan Li, Cisco Systems
RUP Requirements: Use Cases • Internet Proxy • Internet Surrogate (CDN) • Intra-CDN • Inter-CDN • Origin CDN • CDN Proxy • Intranet Proxy / Surrogate • Non-intermediary uses
RUP Requirements: Use Cases (payloads) • Invalidations • Updates / Deltas / “hints” • Configuration / resource handling (metadata)
RUP Requirements: Discussion • Open Discussion of the Draft • Next Steps?
IDD Requirements: Use Cases • User-Agent configuration • Mesh-building • Surrogate shortcut
IDD Requirements: Discussion • Open Discussion of the Draft • IDD Models • IDD Implementers
Wrap-Up • RUP • IDD