1 / 40

Peritoneal Dialysis: Regimes, Survival Rates, and Peritonitis Trends (1997-2012)

Explore peritoneal dialysis regimes, technique survival, causes of peritonitis, and outcome trends from 1997 to 2012, sourced from the 20th MDTR Report 2012. Analyze variation in delivered Kt/V, technique outcomes by age, gender, diabetes status, and Kt/V levels.

ladams
Download Presentation

Peritoneal Dialysis: Regimes, Survival Rates, and Peritonitis Trends (1997-2012)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CHAPTER 12Peritoneal Dialysis Sunita Bavanandan Lily Mushahar Anita Bhajan Manocha Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  2. Table 12.1.1: Peritoneal dialysis regimes, 1997-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  3. Table 12.1.2: PD System, 1997-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  4. Table 12.1.3a: CAPD Number of Exchanges per day, 1997-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  5. Table 12.1.3b: APD dwell volumes per day, 1997-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  6. Table 12.2.1: Distribution of delivered Kt/V, PD patients 2003-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  7. Figure 12.2.1: Cumulative distribution of delivered Kt/V, PD patients 1997-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  8. Table 12.2.2: Variation in proportion of patients with Kt/V  1.7 per week among PD centres, 1997-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  9. Figure 12.2.2: Variation in proportion of patients with Kt/V  1.7 per week among PD centres Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  10. Table 12.2.3: Peritoneal transport status by PET D/P creatinine at 4 hours, new PD patients 2004-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  11. Table 12.2.4: Peritoneal Transport Status (PET) with dialysis vintage Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  12. Table 12.3.1(a): Unadjusted technique survival by age (uncensored for death and transplant), 1997-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  13. Figure 12.3.1(a): Unadjusted technique survival by age (uncensored for death and transplant), 1997-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  14. Table 12.3.1(b): Unadjusted technique survival by age (censored for death and transplant), 1997-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  15. Figure 12.3.1(b): Unadjusted technique survival by age (censored for death and transplant), 1997-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  16. Table 12.3.2(a): Unadjusted technique survival by gender (uncensored for death and transplant), 1997-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  17. Figure 12.3.2(a): Unadjusted technique survival by gender (uncensored for death and transplant), 1997-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  18. Table 12.3.2(b): Unadjusted technique survival by gender (censored for death and transplant), 1997-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  19. Figure 12.3.2(b): Unadjusted technique survival by gender (censored for death and transplant), 1997-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  20. Table 12.3.3(a): Unadjusted technique survival by diabetes status (uncensored for death and transplant), 1997-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  21. Figure 12.3.3(a): Unadjusted technique survival by Diabetes status (uncensored for death and transplant), 1997-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  22. Table 12.3.3(b): Unadjusted technique survival by diabetes status (censored for death and transplant), 1997-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  23. Figure 12.3.3(b): Unadjusted technique survival by diabetes status (censored for death and transplant), 1997-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  24. Table 12.3.4: Unadjusted technique survival by Kt/V, 1997-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  25. Figure 12.3.4: Unadjusted technique survival by Kt/V,1997-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  26. Table 12.3.5: Adjusted hazard ratio for change of modality, 1997-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  27. Table 12.3.6: Reasons for drop-out from PD program, 2003-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  28. Table 12.3.7: Drop-out rate from PD program with time on treatment, 2003-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  29. Table 12.3.8: Time on PD (1997-2012) Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  30. Table 12.4.1 Variation in peritonitis rate (patient-month/episode) among PD centres, 1997-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  31. Figure 12.4.1 Variation in peritonitis rate among PD centres, 2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  32. Table 12.4.2: Causative organism in PD peritonitis, 2003-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  33. 400 350 300 250 Frequency 200 150 100 50 0 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 Staph. Aureus Staph coagulase neg. Other gram positive Pseudomonas E.Coli Polymicrobial Fungal Mycobacterium Culture negative Figure12.4.2 Causative organism in PD peritonitis, 2001-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  34. Outcome of peritonitis in 2012 16.07% 20.44% 63.49% Resolved Not resolved, catheter removed Death Figure 12.4.3(a): Outcome of peritonitis by causative organism, 2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  35. Table 12.4.3(a): Outcome of peritonitis by causative organism, 1993-2002 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  36. Resolved Not resolved, catheter removed Death 100 80 60 Percent (%) 40 20 0 Strep E.Coli Others Others Fungal Others Klebsiella No growth Enterobacter Polymicrobial Acinetobacter Staph. Aureus Pseudomonas Mycobacterium Staph Coagulase Neg. Figure 12.4.3(b): Outcome of peritonitis by causative organism, 1993-2002 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  37. Table 12.4.3(b): Outcome of peritonitis by causative organism, 2003-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  38. Resolved Not resolved, catheter removed Death 100 80 60 Percent (%) 40 20 0 Strep E.Coli Fungal Others Others Others Klebsiella No growth Enterobacter Polymicrobial Acinetobacter Staph. Aureus Pseudomonas Mycobacterium Staph Coagulase Neg. Figure 12.4.3(c): Outcome of peritonitis by causative organism, 2003-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  39. Resolved Not resolved, catheter removed Death 100 80 60 Percent (%) 40 20 0 2003-12 2003-12 1993-02 2003-12 1993-02 2003-12 1993-02 2003-12 1993-02 2003-12 1993-02 2003-12 2003-12 1993-02 2003-12 1993-02 2003-12 2003-12 1993-02 2003-12 1993-02 1993-02 2003-12 1993-02 1993-02 2003-12 2003-12 1993-02 1993-02 1993-02 Strep E.Coli Others Others Others Fungal Klebsiella No growth Enterobacter Polymicrobial Acinetobacter Staph. Aureus Pseudomonas Mycobacterium Staph Coagulase Neg. Figure 12.4.3(d): Comparing outcome of peritonitis by causative organism in 1993-2002 vs 2003-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

  40. Table 12.4.4: Risk factors influencing peritonitis rate, 1993-2012 Source: 20th MDTR Report 2012, NRR

More Related