1 / 8

Evaluating the Creation of a New Governmental Agency: Strategic Objectives and Budgetary Considerations

In a political climate critical of expansive government, establishing a new governmental agency without clear funding and strategic objectives raises concerns. Assessing the need for yet another bureaucratic layer and its potential impact demands careful scrutiny and accountability.

laddie
Download Presentation

Evaluating the Creation of a New Governmental Agency: Strategic Objectives and Budgetary Considerations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. OBSERVATION: In a political environment that chastises more and “bigger” government, the creation of yet another governmental “review board” or “agency” is poorly conceived, particularly when funding for such an agency has NOT been defined and validated with strategic business objectives and outcomes. CTI22 2012 FRANCHISE AGREEMENT ACCESSMENT, #4

  2. OBSERVATION: (CONTINUED) Notably, both the Knowledge Network and CTI22 have their own Boards for administration; and as with CTAC, the creation of another level of administration is superfluous, redundant, and again, unnecessary. Where’s the due diligence? CTI22 2012 FRANCHISE AGREEMENT ACCESSMENT, #4

  3. a. How exactly is the City of Omaha to pay for the creation and on-going operation of this “agency?” CTI22 2012 FRANCHISE AGREEMENT ACCESSMENT, #4

  4. b. What specific kinds of jobs are to be created for this agency, and why? CTI22 2012 FRANCHISE AGREEMENT ACCESSMENT, #4

  5. c. As with the CTAC Board, is this yet another event of political patronage – with incumbents who do NOT wield actual subject matter expertise in the design, operation and management of a PEG broadcast entity? CTI22 2012 FRANCHISE AGREEMENT ACCESSMENT, #4

  6. d. What and how exactly is this “agency” actually going to “help” CTI22 and the Knowledge Network (what are the duties and responsibilities, essential job functions, job standards, strategic business objectives, etc.)? CTI22 2012 FRANCHISE AGREEMENT ACCESSMENT, #4

  7. e. If outsourced to a third party, why and who actually makes this decision, and what specific criteria will be used? CTI22 2012 FRANCHISE AGREEMENT ACCESSMENT, #4

  8. How exactly is the City of Omaha going to validate the ROI in creating this “agency,” or by outsourcing the expense for creating this agency? CTI22 2012 FRANCHISE AGREEMENT ACCESSMENT, #4

More Related