180 likes | 276 Views
Muokkaa otsikon perustyyliä napsauttamalla. 1. Muokkaa tekstin perustyylejä napsauttamalla toinen taso. COMMON SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS FOR SIX LARGEST CITIES IN FINLAND 22 March 2007,Sevilla, Spain Marketta Karhu, Oulu, Finland. 6.3.2007. Oulu. Tampere. Vantaa. Turku. Helsinki.
E N D
Muokkaa otsikon perustyyliä napsauttamalla 1 • Muokkaa tekstin perustyylejä napsauttamalla • toinen taso COMMON SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS FOR SIX LARGEST CITIES IN FINLAND 22 March 2007,Sevilla, Spain Marketta Karhu, Oulu, Finland 6.3.2007
Oulu Tampere Vantaa Turku Helsinki Espoo The six major cities in Finland
2003CITY MANAGERS SET UP A WORKING GROUP 3 • The task of the working group was • to develop and harmonize environmental reporting • to agree on and define common sustainability indicators including economical issues • to share experiences and knowledge between the six cities and inside of each city
RESULTS 4 • Final report includes • Decided content of a sustainability report • Ecological sustainability indicators • Environmental economic key figures • Instruction manual for calculating the chosen indicators
CRITERIA FOR INDICATORS 5 • Availability • Repeatability • Representative • Describes development trends in operations of a city organization • Are close to every day work of the employees of a city organization
ECOLOGIAL SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS 6 • Indicators (27) are divided as follows: • Indicators describing general development • Sustainability of land use and urban structure • Environmental load and eco-efficiency of activities • Mobility efficiency • Environmentally responsible consumption and environmental education
FURTHER ACTIONS 7 • To continue development of ecological and economical sustainability indicators and check calculation • To make a joint report of the results in the six participating cities • To choose common social sustainability indicators
A. INDICATORS DESCRIBING GENERAL DEVELOPMENT 8 • Ecological Footprint • Green House Gas emissions • Energy consumption of the community • Citizens’ satisfaction • Environmental attitude and awareness of the city’s personnel
B. SUSTAINABILITY OF LAND USE AND URBAN STRUCTURE 9 • Amount of buildings and apartments included the town plan • Amount of recreational and protected areas included the town plan • Share of nature reserves from the total surface area of the city • Accessibility of services
C. ENVIRONMENTAL LOAD AND ECO-EFFIENCY OF ACTIVITIES 10 • Electricity consumption • Water consumption • Number of inhabitants and real-estates which have joined into the district heating • Specific electricity, heat and water consumption • Air quality • Waste water load from the community • Amount of waste • Amount of recycled waste
C. MOBILITY EFFICIENCY 12 • Diversity of mobility • Number of cars • Number of passengers using public transport • Total km of pedestrian/cycle paths
E. ENVIRONMENTALLY RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 16 • Paper consumption in city organization • City procurements that consider environmental aspects • Schools and day-care centres with environmental management plans • Participation in city-organized environmental education
CORE CONTENTS OF A SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 18 • Survey of the city manager • The city in a ”nutshell” • Description of environmental management system in the city • Common sustainability indicators • Special indicators for the city • Sustainable development in the departments of the city organization