1 / 57

Heavy Quark and Quarkonia Production at RHIC

Title. 1/43. ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji. Heavy Quark and Quarkonia Production at RHIC. Taku Gunji Center for Nuclear Study University of Tokyo. Major discovery at RHIC. 2. ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji. Major discovery at RHIC. Evidence of strong coupled QGP

lajos
Download Presentation

Heavy Quark and Quarkonia Production at RHIC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Title 1/43 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji Heavy Quark and Quarkonia Production at RHIC Taku Gunji Center for Nuclear Study University of Tokyo

  2. Major discovery at RHIC 2 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji Major discovery at RHIC • Evidence of strong coupled QGP • Large energy loss/large opacity (high pT) • 1000<dNg/dy<2000 (GLV), 6<q<24 GeV2/fm (PQM) • Partonic flow/small viscosity (low pT) • Relativistic hydrodynamics, early thermalization (0.6fm/c) • Quark coalescence (mid. pT) v2 PHENIX & STAR R. Lacey et al.: PRL 98:092301, 2007

  3. Further investigation 3 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji Further investigation • Correlation tagged by Jets • Particle correlation in df and dh space • Particle production with respect to reaction plane • Thermal photon measurement • T and d.o.f of the medium • Heavy quark and Quarknoia measurement • Transport properties of the medium • Deconfinement, Temperature field • and more …. X-N. Wang, N. Xu, H. Zhang, G-L. Ma, in this conference Y. Yamaguchi , F-M. Lui in this conference Y. Kim, T. Gunji, K. Morita, H.Fujii, T. Umeda, Y. Akamatsu, S. Sakai, A. Rothkopf, E. Wang, in this conference

  4. Heavy Quarks 4 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji B. Mueller, nucl-th/0404015 Heavy Quarks • mHQ≫ T, LQCD • Created only at the beginning of collisions via hard process. • point like pQCD process and well calibrated in p+p collisions • No chemical equilibrium. Abundance is frozen. • Reveals transport properties of the medium. • Energy loss and flow measurement • Elastic vs. Radiative • Diffusion constant • h/s of the medium G.D. Moore, D Teaney PRC71, 064904 (2005)

  5. Quarkonia 5 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji Quarkonia • Probe of the Deconfinement • Color screening [T. Matsui and H. Satz (1986)] • Attraction between qqbar pairs is reduced in the medium. • Color force is shorter range and binding is weaker. • When force range/screening radius (T-1) become less than binding radius, qqbar is never bound. H. Satz (SQM08) H. Satz (SQM08) Measurement of Quarkonia suppression  Achieved temperature of the medium.

  6. Title of Part 1 6 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji Heavy Quark Production at RHIC

  7. Heavy Quark Measurement at RHIC 7 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji Heavy Quark Measurement at RHIC • Single leptons (e,m) via semi-leptonic decay • c-hadron  e+ + anything (B.R.: 9.6%) • D0 (B.R.: 6.87%) D(B.R.: 17.2%) • Cannot separate c/b. • Direct meas. via hadronic decay • Direct measurement (inv. Mass) • D0K+p (B.R.:3.85%) • Challenging meas. (S/N) • e-h correlation • c/b separation • Df space or mass space. • di-electrons

  8. PHENIX and STAR 8 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji PHENIX and STAR • PHENIX • Electrons & hadrons, |y|<0.35 • p Rejection>103@90% eff. (MB) • Muons, 1.2<|y|<2.2 • Cut 98% of hadrons by absorber. • Single leptons, e-h, ee pairs • STAR • Hadrons & electrons, |y|<1 • Larger acceptance for hadrons. • Single electrons, e-h, Direct reconstruction

  9. Non-photonic electron measurement 9 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji Non-photonic electron measurement • Electrons from heavy quark decays • Inclusive electrons – photonic electrons • Photonic electrons • Conversion of photons in material • Dalitz decay of light neutral mesons (mainly p0 and h) • Cocktail subtraction & converter method

  10. Spectrum and FONLL calculation 10 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji Spectrum and FONLL calculation Phys. Rev. Lett 97,252002 (2006) Heavy flavor electron spectrum compared to FONLL. Data/FONLL = 1.71 with error Cross section shape for pT > 1.6 GeV/c agrees with FONLL upper limit

  11. b/(c+b) ratio by e-h correlation 11 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji b/(c+b) ratio by e-h correlation S. Sakai • ~50% contribution from b for pTe>3~4 GeV

  12. Single leptons in d+Au 12 gluons in Pb / gluons in p x ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji Single leptons in d+Au • Shadowing/Cronin effect • Results from 2003 d+Au • RdA>1 for south (x2 is large) • RdA<1 for north (x2 is small) • 2008 d+Au data is necessary. Shadowing Anti Shadowing Eskola et al. NPA696 (2001) 729 |y|<1 Au going d going Raphael (SQM08)

  13. Spectra in Au+Au collisions 13 MB 0%~ ~92% p+p ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji Spectra in Au+Au collisions PHENIX PRL98 173301 (2007) Heavy flavor electron spectra Curves: binary scaled p+p Reference (FONLL) Clear high pT suppression developing towards central collisions S/B > 1 for pT > 2 GeV/c according to inside box figure

  14. RAA vs. pT for various centralities 14 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji RAA vs. pT for various centralities [pT<1.6 GeV/c] p+p: data (converter) [pT>1.6 GeV/c] p+p: scaled FONLL PHENIX PRL98 173301 (2007) Suppression level is the almost same as p0 and h in high pT.

  15. Non-photonic electron v2 15 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji Non-photonic electron v2 PHENIX PRL98 173301 (2007) • Final result from 2004 Au+Au • Preliminary result from 2007 Au+Au • Large v2 of non-photonic electrons is observed. Greco et al., PLB 595 (2004) 202 • pQCD calculation with and without charm quark flow. • Clear indication of charm flow in the medium.

  16. Model Comparison 16 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji Model Comparison PHENIX PRL98 173301 (2007) • pQCD radiative E-loss with upscaled transport coeff. • Langevin with elastic pQCD + resonances + coalescence • Langevin with upscaled pQCD elastic • pQCD elastic scattering • G-1 = ttherm ~ 20 fm/c • pQCD+resonance+coalescence • G-1 = ttherm ~ 5 fm/c (ttherm for b ~ 15fm/c)

  17. Medium Properties 17 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji Medium Properties • From diffusion coefficient to h/s • Rapp and van Hees [PRC 71:034907, 2005] • DHQ x 2 pT ~ 4-6. • Moore and Teaney [PRC 71:064901, 2005] • DHQ x 2 pT ~ 3-12. • This gives h/s ~ (4/3-2)/4p • indicate small value and close to conjectured limit (ħ/4p) • significantly below h/s of helium (4ph/s ~ 9) strong coupl. h/s≈ 1/4p Dx (2pT) = 1/2TD weak coupl. h/s ≈ 4/15 n <p> ltr=1/5 TD

  18. Hydro+Heavy Quark 18 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji Y. Akamatsu Hydro + Heavy Quark Y. Akamatsu et al. arXiv:0809.1499 • Relativistic treatment of Brown Motion • Drag force inspired by AdS/CFT g = (2.1  0.5) from AdS/CFT w.c s.c

  19. RAAc and RAAb 19 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji RAAc and RAAb S. Sakai • RAA(e) = r*RAAb+(1-r)*RAAc, r=b/(c+b) [STAR] • RAAc& RAAb correlation • together with models • Dominant uncertainty is • normalization in RAA analysis • RAAb< 1 ; B meson suppressed • prefer Dissociate and • resonance model • (large b energy loss) pT>5 GeV/c I; Phys. Lett. B 632, 81 (2006) ; dNg/dy = 1000 II; Phys. Lett. B 694, 139 (2007) III; Phys.Rev.Lett.100(2008)192301

  20. RAAc/RAAb 20 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji RAAc/RAAb W. Horowitz SQM07 • Further constraint of heavy quark transportation • pQCD rad+el vs. AdS/CFT drag momentum loss • High pT D and B measurement is necessary.

  21. Conclusion (1) 21 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji Conclusion (1) • Heavy quark measurement has been done by PHENIX and STAR. • Differential cross section can be described by FONLL calculation (within theoretical uncertainty) • Larger than 50% of b contribution for pTe>3-4 GeV/c • Strong suppression in non-photonic yield was observed in Au+Au collisions. • Compatible to pi0 and eta suppression. • Large elliptic flow of non-photonic was observed. • From RAA and v2, • Strongly interacting (coupled) medium even for heavy quarks. • charm quark thermalization ~ 5fm/c • h/s ~ (4/3-2)/4p, close to conjecture limit • Differentiate D/B suppression pattern more helpful

  22. Title of Part 2 22 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji Heavy Quarkonia Production at RHIC

  23. J/y Mass Spectra at RHIC 23 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji J/y Mass Spectra at RHIC 2005 p+p 2008 d+Au 2005 Cu+Cu 2004 Au+Au

  24. J/y Production in p+p collisions 24 PHENIX PRL 98, 232002 (2007) STAR arXiv: 0806.0353 [nucl-ex] M. J. Leitch RHIC&AGS Meeting 2008 PHENIX PRL 98, 232002 (2007) STAR arXiv: 0806.0347 [nucl-ex] ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji J/y Production in p+p collisions

  25. J/y Production in the medium 25 tccbar~ 0.06fm, tform ~ 1fm/c [Bhanot+Peskin ’79] ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji J/y Production in the medium • Initial stage • Gluon shadowing • Gluon saturation (CGC) • Nuclear Matter • Nuclear absorption • Cronin effect Initial + nuclear matter effect = “CNM effect” • Hot and dense medium • Color screening • Dissociation by gluon • Regeneration from • heavy qqbar pairs

  26. Hot and dense medium effects 26 Potential Model & lattice simulations S. Digal, F. Karsch and H. Satz TJ/y ~ 1.2Tc [A. Mocsy et al, PRL 99(2007)211602, HP’08] Tcc ~ 2Tc [T. Umeda, PRD. 75, 094502 (07)] ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji Hot and dense medium effects • Color screening • Screening and Sequential Melting • Feed down effect • J/y ~ 0.6J/y+0.3cc+0.1y’ • Fraction not clear at RHIC • Rcc < 42% (90% CL) • Ry’ = 8.6%  2.5%

  27. Hot and dense medium effects 27 R. Rapp et al. arXiv:0807.2470 Eur.Phys.J.C43:91-96,2005 A. Andronic et al. NPA 789 (2007) 334 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji Hot and dense medium effects • Dissociation by gluons • Gluo-effect :J/y+gccbar • Quasifree : J/y+gccbar+g • Dominance depends on ebind of J/y. (Color Screening) • Recombination • From uncorrelated ccbar pairs. • Enhance of the yield. • Depends on charm production • Statistical hadronization (A. Andronic et al.) • Kinetic formation (R. Rapp et al.) • J/y transport (L. Yan, N. Xu, P. Zhuang et al.)

  28. J/y Suppression at SPS 28 F. Karsch et al., PLB, 637 (2006) 75 Pb-Pb @ 158 GeV ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji J/y suppression at SPS R. Rapp et al. Phys.Rev.Lett.92:212301,2004. • Sequential Melting • Direct J/y unlikely to melt. cc and y’ are screened. Absence associated feed down to J/y. • Dissociation + Recombination • a little recombination contribution

  29. Cold Matter effects 29 • σabs = 4.18 ± 0.35 mb • at SPS anti-shadowing arXiv:0802.0139 shadowing ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji Cold Matter effects • Initial stage effect • Gluon shadowing or Gluon Saturation (CGC) • depletion of gluon PDF in heavy nuclei at small x • Nuclear matter effect • Nuclear absorption • Dissociation of J/y or pre-resonance by spectators. • Cronin effect • J/y in d+Au @ PHENIX: • -2.2<y<-1.2 : x~0.09 • y~0 : x~0.02 • 1.2<y<2.2 : x~0.003

  30. J/y Production in d+Au collisions 30 PHENIX PRC 77, 024912 (2008) ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji J/y Production in d+Au collisions PHENIX revisits systematic error evaluation. • Tendency is well agreement within shadowing predictions. • EKS/NDSG Model (+21 process, g+gJ/y) • Break up cross section is 2~4mb. • Need more statistics to constraint cold matter effects.

  31. Another shadowing model 31 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji Another shadowing model E. G. Ferreiro et al. arXiv:0809.4684[hep-ph] • Take into accout g+gJ/y+g formation process (extrinsic) • Tendency is well agreement with inclusion of extrinsic process. • Less rapidity dep.

  32. 2008 d+Au collisions 32 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji 2008 d+Au collisions • PHENIX Run8 d+Au ~ 30 x Run3 d+Au 59 nb-1 63 nb-1 57,030 J/   (~73,000 from all data) 4,369 J/  ee (~6,000 from all data) Precise CNM effects will be studied using high statistic data!

  33. J/y Production in A+A collisions 33 |y|<0.35 PRL.98, 232301 (2007) PRL 101, 122301 (2008) 1.2<|y|<2.2 PRL.98, 232301 (2007) arXiv:0801.0220 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji J/y Production in A+A collisions RAA (1.2<|y|<2.2) < RAA (|y|<0.35) ~ RAA at SPS (0<y<1)

  34. CNM effects in A+A 34 PHENIX PRC 77, 024912 (2008) E.G.Ferreiro et al. arXiv:0809.4684 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji CNM effects in A+A • Extrapolation from d+Au collisions PHENIX revisits systematic error evaluation. • Even though error is large, • CNM effect is similar between both rapidities • Extrinsic treatment (g+gJ/y+g) gives stronger CNM at forward. • Stronger suppression than expectations from CNM effect • Need more d+Au data to constraint CNM effects.

  35. Gluon Saturation in A+A 35 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji Gluon Saturation in A+A CGC (cold matter effect) can describe hadron production in A+A collisions at forward rapidity at RHIC. D. Kharzeev et al. arXiv:0809.2933 dN/dy • Normalization factor is from overall fit to data. • can be fixed using high statistic d+Au data. • Rapidity shape can be described by CGC. • Final state effect is roughly rapidity independent.

  36. Statistical Hadronization 36 A. Andronic et al. NPA 789 (2007) 334, QM08 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji Statistical Hadornization • Less recombination at forward rapidity due to smaller cross section of charm at forward rapidity • Need to understand charm production.

  37. Kinetic formation 37 X. Zhao, R. Rapp et al. arXiv:0712.2407 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji Kinetic formation Total yield with Charm relaxation time Available charm quarks for recombination is controlled by 1-exp(-t/tc) Total = CNM effects + Dissociation (p-dep) + Coalescence (tc=7fm/c) • Stronger suppression is supplemented by recombination. • Depends on charm thermalization time (tc ~ 7fm/c) • Need to understand charm production in Au+Au

  38. Sequential Melting (Hydro+J/y) 38 Hydro + J/y T. Gunji et al. PRC 76:051901,2007 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji Sequential Melting (Hydro+J/y) T. Gunji et al. PRC 76 051901, 2007 TJ/y = 2.0Tc • Embed free-streaming J/y, cc, y’ into the evolution of matter. • 3+1 hydro. Ncol distribution for J/y and pT from p+p. • complete melting above dissociation temperature. • J/y suppression at RHIC can be described by sequential melting. • direct J/y suppression starts around Npart~160 (T ~ 2Tc in hydro). • reflect temperature field of the medium. • TJ/y can be determined in a narrow region. (1.9< TJ/y/Tc < 2.1)

  39. Sequential Dissociation 39 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji Sequential Dissociation Y. Liu et al. SQM08 • J/y transport • Loss (dissociation) + gain (recombination) term • Simplicity : Well agreement with the data TJ/y/Tc = 1.9

  40. J/y in high pT 40 M. J. Leitch RHIC&AGS 2008 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji J/y in high pT Many effects are here… • Cronin effect • enhance higher pT • (anti-)Shadowing • enhance pT • Recombination • enhance lower pT • Screening & dissociation • suppress lower pT • hot-wind scenario • suppress high pT • RAA for high pT J/y = 0.9  0.2 • seems less suppression compared to low pT J/y ( RAA=0.59  0.02) but still consistent with RAA = 0.59 by fitting results. • Need to have more data to disentangle: • Cronin effect (d+Au), leakage effect, recombination,,,,,

  41. J/y v2 at RHIC 33 41 D. Krieg et al. arXiv:0806.0736 NA50 HP08 PRELIMINARY minimum-bias Rapp & van Hees, PRC 71, 034907 (2005) Run-7 Run-4 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/08: T. Gunji J/y v2 at RHIC • First J/y flow measurement by PHENIX. • v2 = -10%  10 %  2%  3% (mid-rapidity) • J/’s from recombination should inherit large charm-quark flow. but difficult to see flow of J/y due to large error bars. • Negative to positive v2  Just Mass ordering? Charm collectivity. • Need more data and need to understand with charm quark v2.

  42. Conclusion (2) 42 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji Conclusion (2) • J/y Production has been measured in p+p, d+Au, A+A collisions at RHIC. • J/y Production in d+Au is consistent with shadowing pictures. • Not constrained well due to the large errors. • Wait for 2008 d+Au analysis • J/y Measurement in Au+Au collisions gives many interesting observations. • Similar suppression between at RHIC (y=0) and at SPS • Stronger suppression at forward than at mid-rapidity. • Dissociation+Recombination • Sequential Melting+gluon saturation • Large uncertainty on cold nuclear matter effects prevents a firm conclusion. More d+Au data. This is highest priority! • Other observables (pT dist., v2) with high statistics will be helpful.

  43. For the future at RHIC 43 max min ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji For the future • Detector Upgrade • PHENIX • VTX/FVTX/NCC • STAR • HFT/TOF/DAQ • Luminosity advance • 100,000 J/y mm • 13,000 J/y ee • LHC!! • x10 charm, x100 bottom production • ϒ family measurement • J/y complete screening or strong recombination

  44. Major discovery at RHIC 2 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji Backup slides

  45. Major discovery at RHIC 2 Ne Electron yield converter 0.8% 0.4% 1.7% W/ converter Dalitz : 0.8% X0 equivalent radiation length Photonic W/O converter Photonic Non-photonic 0 Material amounts: 0 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji Non-photonic electron measurement • Inclusive electrons – photonic electrons • Photonic electrons • Conversion of photons in material • Dalitz decay of light neutral mesons (mainly p0 and h) • Cocktail subtraction & converter method

  46. R. Rapp at SQM08 _ _ q q Microscopic Calculations of Diffusion: q,g c • pQCD elastic scattering:g-1= ttherm ≥20 fm/cslow [Svetitsky ’88, Mustafa et al ’98, Molnar et al ’04, Zhang et al ’04, Hees+RR ’04, Teaney+Moore‘04] • D-/B-resonance model:g-1= ttherm ~ 5 fm/c “D” parameters: mD , GD c c • recent development: lQCD-potential scattering [van Hees, Mannarelli, Greco+RR ’07] 3.) Heavy Quarks in the QGP • Brownian • Motion: Fokker Planck Eq. [Svetitsky ’88,…] Q scattering rate diffusion constant

  47. R. Rapp at SQM08 G 2.5 Comparison of Drag Coefficients • pert. QCD with running coupling ~ AdS/CFT • increase with temperature except T-matrix (melting resonances)

  48. R. Rapp at SQM08 2.1.3 Thermal Relaxation of Heavy Quarks in QGP Charm: pQCD vs. Resonances Charm vs. Bottom pQCD “D” • tctherm ≈ tQGP ≈ 3-5 fm/c • bottom does not thermalize • factor ~3 faster with • resonance interactions!

  49. Major discovery at RHIC 2 ATHIC Meeting 2008 10/13/2008: T. Gunji Universality of jet quenching • Universal Bound Model • Upper limit of energy, which can escape the medium.

  50. AdS/CFT vs. pQCD with Jets • Langevin model • Collisional energy loss for heavy quarks • Restricted to low pT • pQCD vs. AdS/CFT computation of D, the diffusion coefficient • ASW model • Radiative energy loss model for all parton species • pQCD vs. AdS/CFT computation of • Debate over its predicted magnitude • ST drag calculation • Drag coefficient for a massive quark moving through a strongly coupled SYM plasma at uniform T • not yet used to calculate observables: let’s do it!

More Related