240 likes | 392 Views
fMRI in NAMIC. Facilitator: Polina Golland Presenters: Jim Fallon and Andy Saykin. fMRI and NAMIC. NAMIC Core 1 projects focus on structure Anatomical DTI Many of us are interested in fMRI Core 1: analysis Core 3: tool for study of the disease Potential for new collaborations.
E N D
fMRI in NAMIC Facilitator: Polina Golland Presenters: Jim Fallon and Andy Saykin
fMRI and NAMIC • NAMIC Core 1 projects focus on structure • Anatomical • DTI • Many of us are interested in fMRI • Core 1: analysis • Core 3: tool for study of the disease • Potential for new collaborations
fMRI Status Update • Basic analysis functions in ITK (GE/Kitware) • User Interface in Slicer (BWH) • Advanced detection/analysis • MIT/BWH – anatomically guided fMRI detection • UC Irvine – localization of activation peaks • Other Core 1 groups • Integrated visualization of anatomy & function
Our goals • Not to replicate existing analysis tools • To identify problems that are • important to Core 3 • interesting to Core 1 • Use NAMIC to create new collaborations
Our findings • Some of the “problems” have already been “solved” • Many items on the “wish list” are in reach • Especially with help of Core 2 • There are some really hard and interesting problems
Anatomically guided fMRI detection Wanmei Ou, MIT No Smoothing Gaussian MRF With anatomy
Quality control for fMRI • Spatiotemporal browser designed for quality control during preprocessing of single subject time series data or contrasts • Easy loading of raw scan formats • Easy navigation through time & space • Quantify signal to noise • Identify temporal spikes optional smoothing • Identify spatial distortion • B0 field map and phantom optional adjustment • Also feature to identify outliers in group data • Tom Nichols at U. Michigan has something like this tool in Matlab. Core 2?
Managing fMRI findings • fMRI activation cluster utility • Need to create functional ROI (fROI) label maps for use in subsequent analyses • Assuming user has created a thresholded activation map • Ability to choose activation clusters to include in the label map • User should be able to choose label values and provide a name in a text field for each cluster • Extract data from these clusters • Individual time series or for group data • Core 2?
Outline of this discussion • Presentations (15-20min) • Jim Fallon • Andy Saykin • Questions (15-20min) • Ask the speakers more detailed questions • Discussion/brainstorming on how we might solve these problems
Major Themes • Integration with anatomical and DTI: • Anatomically accurate and precise integration of all modalities, including fMRI, DTI, into a single analysis framework • Characterizing fMRI activation areas: • Invent new ways to describe active areas and how they change from an experiment to an experiment. This ties into population analysis of activation.
Critical samples in BOLD DMPFC 7 Frontal pole Heschl’s DLPFC Occip STG IFG LOF ITG VMPFC CB Fallon
Variability in population Anterior-Inferior View Anterior View
BA 7 DLPFC BA 46 SLF-2
Thresholded voxels (p<0.05) Activation patterns mixture model (Kim, et al, 2005) beta map fBIRN phantom sensorimotor task Add 20% “gutter region” around each strictly defined area (e.g., DLPFC) to capture “rogue” functional activations in different subject and patient populations…”DLPC PLUS”
fMRI Specific Applications • Tool for assessment of test-retest reproducibility of fMRI experiments • Simple approach would be calculating intraclass correlation coefficients for voxels and ROIs • Useful but limited value because of fluctuations in exact peak and distribution of activation foci • A more sophisticated approach would include identification and extraction of key spatiotemporal features • Prior knowledge could be used to inform regarding importance • Reproducible features could be quantified • A related tool would provide an analysis of longitudinal stability and change • Consider reliable change index approach applied to activation maps
Multimodality Integration • Registration of fMRI, DTI and anatomic MR • individual and group data • Easy mapping between atlas space and native scan space • Permit warping from native space to atlas space or vice versa • Automated parcellation of cortical surface and subcortical gray matter structures • Generate label maps • Extract quantitative data from labeled ROIs or fROIs • e.g. examine atrophy within functionally derived ROI
Multimodality Integration - II • Integrate measures of connectivity • Voxel by voxel and labeled ROI measures of connectivity within single subject time series • Resting & Task-induced connectivity • Changes in strength of connectivity over time • important for learning and habituation experiments • Relation to existing work • PLS, SEM, DCM, POI, other? • Visualization tool to display strength of connectivity including functional and neuroanatomic (tractography)
Major Themes • Integration with anatomical and DTI: • Anatomically accurate and precise integration of all modalities, including fMRI, DTI, into a single analysis framework • Characterizing fMRI activation areas: • Invent new ways to describe active areas and how they change from an experiment to an experiment. This ties into population analysis of activation.