1 / 25

Project 5: Ramp Metering Control in Freeway System

Project 5: Ramp Metering Control in Freeway System. Team Members: Faculty Mentor: Isaac Quaye Dr. Heng Wei Junior GRA: Emma Hand Karteek K. Allam Sophomore Jared Sagaga Junior. 2. Sponsor. 3. What are Ramp Meters?.

lala
Download Presentation

Project 5: Ramp Metering Control in Freeway System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Project 5: Ramp Metering Control in Freeway System Team Members: Faculty Mentor: Isaac Quaye Dr. Heng Wei JuniorGRA: Emma Hand Karteek K. Allam Sophomore Jared Sagaga Junior

  2. 2 Sponsor

  3. 3 What are Ramp Meters? • Traffic controls that regulate traffic flow entering a highway (Source: Reference 6)

  4. 4 Uses of Ramp Meters • Reduce congestion • Improve throughput • Reduce travel time • Improved travel time reliability • Ensuring safety of vehicles (Source: Reference 6)

  5. 5 Types of Ramp Metering • Fixed time • Pre-timed meter cycle based off of past data • Responsive • Meter cycles vary depending on changes in traffic conditions • Isolated • Coordinated

  6. 6 Meters Across the US Seattle: 232 Minn-St. Paul: 444 Portland: 110 Milwaukee: 122 Ohio: 34 New York: 75 Chicago: 117 Salt Lake City: 23 Denver: 46 N. Virginia: 26 LA: 1478 Phoenix: 122 Arlington: 5 Implemented - Responsive In Progress - Responsive In Progress - Fixed

  7. 7 Networking • Received information from Mn/DOT, WSDOT, ODOT • Mn/DOT uses traffic responsive • WSDOT uses traffic responsive with fuzzy logic algorithm • ODOT uses fixed timings

  8. 8 Scope of Study • Conducting research on the study site (I-275) by gathering data using traffic counter and GPS device • Criteria • Elevated locations nearby for placing the camcorder to capture the traffic • Location should be busier in the peak hours than the normal flow of freeway • Analyzing traffic during the peak hours • Investigating and observing both a single and two lane ramp implementation

  9. 9 Goals • Analysis of data collected • Investigate • Effectiveness of ramp implementation • One or two lane ramp metering • Successfully run simulations on VISSIM • Present and complete deliverables

  10. 10 Tasks • Utilizing the GPS software (QTravel) and traffic counting software (PetraPro) • Processing of data collected from GPS and traffic counting device • Generate VISSIM network model using processed data • Analyze results

  11. Methodology 11 Study Site One Lane Ramp VISSIM Results Data Collection Two Lane Ramp

  12. 12 Data Collection Study Site I-275 Reed Hartman Highway Legend Mosteller Road East-Bound Sections West-Bound Sections

  13. 13 Data Collection (cont.)

  14. 14 Data Collection (cont.)

  15. 15 Data Collection (cont.) (Source: Reference 7) (Source: Reference 8)

  16. 16 Data Collection (cont.) QTravel

  17. 17 Data Collection (cont.) Sample of data collected from GPS device for I-275

  18. 18 Data Collection (cont.)

  19. 19 Training • Using GPS device and software • Collecting data with GPS device and extracting it for analysis using the software (QTravel) • Using Traffic Counting device • To count traffic flow from camera recordings • Count and record the types of vehicles

  20. 20 Training (cont.) GPS Traffic Counter

  21. 21 Progress • Post-Processing data collected • Analyzing the data collected with the GPS and traffic counting device • Intro to VISSIM • Overview on the function of VISSIM • Preliminary training on VISSIM’s interface

  22. 22 Timeline Legend Complete Incomplete

  23. 23 References • Zongzhong, T., Nadeem, A. C., Messer, C. J., Chu, C. (2004). “Ramp Metering Algorithms and Approaches for Texas,” Transportation Technical Report No. FHWA/TX-05/0-4629-1, Texas Transportation Institute, The Texas A&M University System, College Station, Texas. • Yu, G., Recker, W., Chu, L. (2009). “Integrated Ramp Metering Design and Evaluation Platform with Paramics,” California PATH Research Report No. UCB-ITS-PRR-2009-10, Institution of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkley, California. • Kang, S., Gillen, D. (1999). “Assessing the Benefits and Costs of Intelligent Transportation Systems: Ramp Meters,” California PATH Research Report No. UCB-ITS-PRR-99-19, Institution of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkley, California. • Arizona Department of Transportation. (2003). Ramp Meter Design, Operations, and Maintenance Guidelines. • Papamichail I., and Papageorgiou, M. (2008). “Traffic-Responsive Linked Ramp-Metering Control,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 9, No. 1, n.p.

  24. 24 References (cont.) • Federal Highway Administration, USDOT (2013). “FHWA Localized Bottleneck Program.” <http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/bn/resources/case_studies/madison_wi.htm> (Accessed 6/9/2014) • Maps, Google (2014). <https://www.google.com/maps/search/homewood+suites+near+Hilton+Cincinnati,+OH/@39.2885017,-84.399993,83m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=en> (Accessed 6/30/2014). • Maps, Google (2012). <https://www.google.com/maps/@39.288408,-84.399636,3a,75y,243.6h,66.31t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1si7sOFQJVai_eF3v7k8u_LQ!2e0> (Accessed 6/30/2014).

  25. 25 Questions?

More Related