1 / 54

Can Web 2.0 Save Teacher Professional Development?

Can Web 2.0 Save Teacher Professional Development?. Sponsored by:. View all upcoming webinars @ www.edweek.org/go/webina r. Gerald Herbert/AP. Our Moderator:. Anthony Rebora Managing editor of Education Week Teacher and the Teacher Professional Development Sourcebook.

lalo
Download Presentation

Can Web 2.0 Save Teacher Professional Development?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Can Web 2.0 Save Teacher Professional Development? Sponsored by: View all upcoming webinars @ www.edweek.org/go/webinar Gerald Herbert/AP

  2. Our Moderator: Anthony Rebora Managing editor of Education Week Teacher and the Teacher Professional Development Sourcebook. www.edweek.org/tm www.teachersourcebook.org

  3. Our Guests: Barbara Treacy Director, EdTech Leaders Online, Education Development Center Christopher Sessums Assistant professor in the College of Educationat the University of Florida

  4. Follow today’s conversation on Twitter. Go to Twitter, and search using keyword #edweeklive. Use the hashtag to converse, share resources, tips, and URLs with our live audience.

  5. Can Web 2.0 Save Professional Development? Barbara Treacy Director, EdTech Leaders Online (ETLO) Education Development Center (EDC)

  6. Today’s Webinar Can Web 2.0 “save” professional development? NO! Can Web 2.0 support effective professional development? YES!

  7. Questions for today • What are the elements of effective PD? • How can Web 2.0 and online tools help educators implement PD more effectively? • What are some online PD tools and models we’ve found useful at EDC?

  8. Elements of Effective PD Professional development should: • be intensive, ongoing, connected to practice • focus on student learning • address teaching of specific curriculum content • align with school improvement priorities & goals • build strong working relationships among teachers -Professional Learning in the Learning Profession by Linda Darling-Hammond et al, NSDC (2009) http://www.nsdc.org/stateproflearning.cfm

  9. Web 2.0 Tools Can Support “Web 2.0 Definition: Online application that uses the World Wide Web (www) as a platform and allows for participatory involvement, collaboration, and interactions among users. Web 2.0 is also characterized by the creation and sharing of intellectual and social resources by end users.” -Leadership for Web2.0 in Education: Promise & Reality by Cheryl Lemke & Ed Coughlin, CoSN (2009)

  10. “In education…we have not really seized upon the power and the tools that are now available to us in the Internet age” -Eric Schmidt, Google CEO http://www.google.com/events/digitalage/index.html But there are so many tools!

  11. How do we know which tools to use? “Technology is a vehicle, not a destination... Rather, aspects of technology – like all components of an effective course – should be chosen according to how they help meet the learning objectives.” -Nine principles for excellence in web-based teaching by Jim Henry and Jeff Meadows http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/179/177

  12. Examples of types of tools Course management tools Enable educators to: • organize & share content, research, multimedia • engage in ongoing discussions • assess and document learning • build formal & informal communities of practice • share and analyze student work • examples:

  13. Voice and Content Tools Enable educators to: • personalize introductions and discussions • provide learning or project summaries • explain a technical piece • create online discussions • address auditory learners and accessibility • examples:

  14. Collaboration Tools Enable educators to: • collaborate & co-create documents, plans, materials, media • brainstorm and share ideas, resources, data, etc • discuss and communicate with team members • examples:

  15. Communication tools Enable educators to • conduct “live” discussions and meetings • blends synchronous and asynchronous learning • address varying learning styles • collaborate and share documents and resources • examples:

  16. More tool types… • Blogging and micro-blogging tools to share ideas or focus on a specific topic or project, such as • Social bookmarking tools to share/save resources, such as

  17. Lessons from EdTech Leaders Online Web 2.0 and Online PD enable: • PD to be extended over time (intensive, ongoing, connected to practice) • Teachers to implement what they’re learning in the classroom (focused on student learning) • Strong focus on content and pedagogy through rich readings, multimedia activities, online explorations(address teaching of specific curriculum content)

  18. Lessons, cont. • Capacity building approaches with local educators leading the PD (align with school improvement priorities and goals) • Learning community models with rich online discussions with participants and facilitator(build strong working relationships among teachers)

  19. A final word “Some online tools have some affordances that, if the training takes advantage of them, can help with some of the classic issues of professional development.” -Dr. Chris Dede, EdWeek interview 10/1/09 http://www.edweek.org/tsb/articles/2009/10/01/01dede.h03.html

  20. Thank you! Contact: Barbara Treacy Btreacy@edc.org EdTech Leaders Online http://edtechleaders.org Education Development Center http://edc.org

  21. Can Web 2.0 Save Teacher Professional Development? Wednesday, November 18, 2009. presenter:Christopher D. Sessums, Ph.D.Post Doctoral Associate in Educational TechnologySchool of Teaching and LearningCollege of Education | University of Florida

  22. areas of interest:learning sciences, learning organizations, and participatory media design

  23. teacher professional development research:Much of what passes for TPD has been described as "fragmented, intellectually superficial" (Borko, 2004).On-going support for meaningful TPD is limited (Barnett, 2002).

  24. teacher professional development research:Lack of day-to-day support and mentoring is related to the 50% attrition rate of new teachers w/in their first 5 years of practice (National Commission on Teaching and America's Future, 2003).

  25. online teacher professional development research (Dede, et al., 2009):oTPD is a relatively nascent field of study.Which design features, tools, and strategies work best are still being analyzed.Evidence is mostly anecdotal with relatively few empirical studies.

  26. my oTPD research examined (Sessums, 2009):• what works• for action research coaches• spread throughout NE Florida• how digital media supported a PLC • how this approach can be effective.

  27. my oTPD research implications for facilitators (Sessums, 2009):• social artist an understanding of community-building & developing social connections• educative mentorsufficient knowledge of the practice itself to demonstrate credibility• community organizationnurturing and strengthening connections• expressed expectations/ground rules

  28. my oTPD research implications for facilitators:Good online community facilitation requires special skills by the facilitator to progress conversations from trivial surface level discussion and social exchange to deeper levels of engagement.(Ambrose 2001; Sherry,Tavalin & Billig 2001; Collison et al. 2000; Sessums, 2009).

  29. my oTPD research implications for facilitators:Create a culture of collaboration – provide activities that require collaboration, sharing, & reflection.

  30. my oTPD research implications for facilitators:Create activities that support dedication to the endeavor (commitment) and dedication to the comm(unity). Involve participants in project planning, defining team identity, goals, and processes.

  31. oTPD facilitator challenges:• technical frustrations• size of community• lack of time due to competing priorities• participants feeling they have nothing to share• info overload after community absence• motivations• how closely should a facil. monitor individuals participation?• standing back and letting participants work through issues

  32. oTPD research implications for community designers:Technical designs should reflect/support the community’s goals.E.g. Task-based, practice-based, knowledge-based, mash-ups (Riel & Polin, 2004)

  33. my oTPD research take-aways (Sessums, 2009):New resource constraints and continuing economic re-organization provides the opportunity to transform TPD activities and processes using newer and more meaningful models.

  34. my oTPD research take-aways (Sessums, 2009):Rethinking management techniques—Use Web 2.0 tools to allow all participants to serve as reservoirs of innovation, contribution, collaboration.

  35. my oTPD research take-aways (Sessums, 2009):Design community activities around your practice. Use Web 2.0 tools to document and share what you’ve learned/accomplished.

  36. my oTPD research take-aways (Dede, et al., 2009):design based research needed—• document and share what works;• for whom;• under what conditions; and• how & why this approach is effective.

  37. Question & Answer Session Questions and Answers

  38. Question #1 With budgets tight, how can school districts and teachers alike know good online teacher development opportunities any more than we know which 1-day workshops might be valuable?

  39. Question #2 How do we still keep learning personal when doing online professional development? How important is the role of "human interaction" in online PD experiences.

  40. Question #3 What kind of structure is needed to maintain any professional development done through Web 2.0 technologies? What are the components of P.D. as it becomes a continuous process rather than an event.

  41. Question #4 How do you ensure that the quality of the content and teaching and learning objectives do not get subsumed by the nature of the tools available?

  42. Question #5 What kinds of funding & resources do schools need to support staff development via online services?

  43. Question #6 How does one work around barriers set up by conservative systems that block important communication technologies without putting users at risk?

  44. Question #7 What district is doing this well? What objective data/research is there to show using Web 2.0 tools is having an impact?

  45. Question #8 Are online conversations as effective as face to-face conversations in supporting the kinds of interaction needed for building trust and consensus within a group?

  46. Question #9 I present staff development training each year to various school staff. How will this trend affect my role? How can I prepare for this new environment?

  47. Question #10 Should administrations allow PD credit for time spent on professional social networking sites. If so, then how do they monitor the time?

  48. Question #11 What has been the success of PD delivered in Second Life-like virtual environments?

  49. An on-demand archive of this webinar is going to be available at www.edweek.org/go/webinarin less than 24hrs. Please visit often, and send this link to your friends.   Thanks for taking part today. We really appreciate it.The Editors @ edweek.org

More Related