1 / 15

Re-Evaluating Minnesota’s Gang Classification System

Re-Evaluating Minnesota’s Gang Classification System. Julie Barrows, Ph.D. University of Minnesota (612) 363-5656 barr0325@umn.edu. Gang Classification Systems. The Development of Minnesota’s System A National Perspective Re-Evaluating Minnesota’s System. Development of MN’s System.

lamis
Download Presentation

Re-Evaluating Minnesota’s Gang Classification System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Re-Evaluating Minnesota’s Gang Classification System Julie Barrows, Ph.D. University of Minnesota (612) 363-5656 barr0325@umn.edu

  2. Gang Classification Systems • The Development of Minnesota’s System • A National Perspective • Re-Evaluating Minnesota’s System

  3. Development of MN’s System • 1996 killings of DavishaGillum and Byron Phillips • Gang Oversight Council – 1997 • MN Gang Strike Force • Councils of Color • Creation of the 10-pt Criteria System • Looked to other states • Involved process • Goal of objectivity

  4. MN’s 10-pt Gang Criteria System • Admits gang membership or association • Is observed to associate on a regular basis with known gang members • Has tattoos indicating gang membership • Wears gang symbols to identify with a specific gang • Is in a photograph with known gang members and/or using gang-related hand signs

  5. MN’s 10-pt Gang Criteria System • Name is on a gang document, hit list, or gang-related graffiti • Is identified as a gang member by a reliable source • Arrested in the company of identified gang members or associates • Corresponds with known gang members or writes and/or receives correspondence about gang activities • Writes about gangs (graffiti) on walls, books, and paper

  6. MN’s 10-pt Gang Criteria System • 1 criterion indicates suspected membership • 3 criteria indicates confirmed membership • 3 criteria + age (14 or older) + gross misd or felony conviction indicates confirmed and convicted membership

  7. A National Perspective • Barrows and Huff (2009) CPP article • Analyzed legislation of gang definitions in all 50 states • Another resource: National Gang Center • http://www.nationalgangcenter.gov/

  8. A National Perspective • 16 states define gang member in statute • 6 states define a gang member as an “individual who actually and in fact belongs to a gang” • 10 states provide criteria for classification • 6 use 2 of +/-7 • FL uses 2 of 11 and NH uses 2 of 4 • VA uses 1 of 3 and KS uses 3 of 8

  9. A National Perspective • All 10 use some combination of: • Resides or frequents gang area • Adopts style of dress

  10. A National Perspective • All 10 use “admits membership” • Most common in the literature as well • KS relies only on the admission or on 3 of their other criteria • CA also relies only on the admission, provided it is made during the incarceration classification procedure

  11. CA’s Classification System • Two stand alone criteria points: • Subject admits during the incarceration process, or • Subject is required to register with law enforcement as a gang member per Section 186.30 PC (convicted of a gang-related offense) • Or the individual meets 2 of the following:

  12. CA’s Classification System • Admits membership in a non-custodial situation • Identified as a gang member by a reliable informant or source • Identified as a gang member by an untested informant or source with corroborative evidence • Seen wearing gang type clothing

  13. CA’s Classification System • Seen displaying gang symbols and/or hand signs • Identifiable gang tattoos • Seen frequenting gang areas • Seen affiliating with documented gang members • Arrested with known gang members for offenses consistent with usual gang activity

  14. Re-Evaluating MN’s System • Room for improvement, but no need to re-invent • Explain the criteria and provide examples • Consult with gang investigators and corrections officials • Consult with gang members • Evaluate data in GangNET and the Pointer File

  15. Gang Identification Systems • Criteria-based classification systems strive for objectivity • Need to avoid both over- and under-identification • Gang members commit more crime- more serious and violent crime- than do nongang members • Public policy needs to target gangs for prevention, intervention, and suppression

More Related