230 likes | 453 Views
May 17, 2000. 3. Agenda. GuidelinesMeasurement TechniquesEarly Testing ResultsSummary. May 17, 2000. 4. Guidelines. USB 2.0 guidelines will be more systematic, detailed than 1.x whitepapersProposed guideline areas:Attenuation, jitter budgetsPackage/board/chassis designEMI/EMC Use of test m
E N D
2. May 17, 2000 2 Platform Design Considerations Jim Choate
Intel Corporation
3. May 17, 2000 3 Agenda Guidelines
Measurement Techniques
Early Testing Results
Summary
4. May 17, 2000 4 Guidelines USB 2.0 guidelines will be more systematic, detailed than 1.x whitepapers
Proposed guideline areas:
Attenuation, jitter budgets
Package/board/chassis design
EMI/EMC
Use of test modes and testing for compliance
5. May 17, 2000 5 Board Design 4 layer sufficient; trace impedancematching is key
3 ns + 26 ns + 1 ns
Avoid long runs
Do not cross plane splits
Minimize vias
Maximize distance to other traces
6. May 17, 2000 6 Board Design Guidelines Board Stack-up:
4 layer, impedance controlled boards required
Impedance targets must be specified
Ask your board vendor what they can achieve
7. May 17, 2000 7 Routing Guidelines Control trace widths to obtain target impedance
Ask your board vendor what they can achieve
As always, cost is a consideration
Maintain strict trace spacing control
Minimize stubs
8. May 17, 2000 8 Routing Guidelines Routing over plane splits
Creating stubs with test points
Violating trace spacing guidelines
9. May 17, 2000 9 Measurement Techniques Selecting appropriate test equipment
Accurate measurement of signal quality requires an oscope and probes with adequate BW and sample rate
Proper test fixtures are also important
10. May 17, 2000 10 Board Testing Use TDRs to verify adherence to budget
Typical TDR measurement
Refer to section 7.1.6.2 of the specification for details
11. May 17, 2000 11 EMI USB1.X EMI solutions don’t work for USB2
Low pass filters damage signal quality
12. May 17, 2000 12 EMI Proper grounding of chassis is crucial
Connector shell must connect to green wireground early and well
IO shield must connect securely to chassisand receptacle
2 wire common mode choke is preferred
Blocks common mode EMI from leaving chassis
Differential signal rolloff frequency should be high
13. May 17, 2000 13 ESD, EMC ESD strikes spread out in time by inductanceof cables and hubs in series
Bypass/flyback caps on Vbus near connector help
Hardware Protection
Well-grounded shield
4 wire common mode choke
Spark gap arrestors
Shielded cables
14. May 17, 2000 14 ESD, EMC Differential squelch/disconnect
Pattern matching before connectivity
Sampling over extended times e.g. Chirp
15. May 17, 2000 15
16. May 17, 2000 16 Early Testing Results
17. May 17, 2000 17 Early Testing Results Back panel eye pattern results
EMI/ESD components
Both at A-connector (TP2) and at end of USB cable (TP3)
Three-stack connector on MB
18. May 17, 2000 18 Board Design Daughtercard at front/side panel
Bypass caps, EMI control components, strain relief
Header and cable
Keyed header, cable of limited length andmatched impedance
19. May 17, 2000 19 Early Testing Results Front Panel Header Cable Options Tested
20. May 17, 2000 20 Early Testing Results Front-panel cable implementation eye pattern results
18 inch, twisted pair, shielded front panel cable
18 inch unshielded front panel “ribbon” cable
21. May 17, 2000 21 Early Testing Results Front-panel cable implementation eye pattern results
18 inch, twisted pair, shielded front panel cable
18 inch unshielded front panel “ribbon” cable
22. May 17, 2000 22 Summary USB 2.0 design presents new challenges
Board layout
Common mode chokes
Chassis grounding
Signal Quality Measurement
Compliance Testing
USBIF will be providing design guidesin such areas