1 / 17

Comparison of the p + p - g signal selection with past results

Comparison of the p + p - g signal selection with past results. C. Di Donato, M. Jacewicz. Signal/Background. X-section  [  b]: 2.04  10 -3 9.87  10 -3 0.30  10 -3 0. 46 0.14  10 -3. Reaction:             0  e  e        0

lamya
Download Presentation

Comparison of the p + p - g signal selection with past results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Comparison of the p+p-g signal selection with past results C. Di Donato, M. Jacewicz

  2. Signal/Background X-section  [b]: 2.04  10-3 9.87  10-3 0.30  10-3 0. 46 0.14  10-3 Reaction:    0  ee 0 ee0 • Most frequent charged  decays: • BR() = (22.73±0.28)  10-2 • BR(0) = (4.60±0.16)  10-2 • BR(ee) = (6.8±0. 8)  10-3

  3. New VS Old RAD Stream 2 pnc 1 charged vertex rxy<4cm & |z|<8cm 2 tracks balanced charge Kinematic fit: quadrimomentum conservation with 2 clusters compatible with photon hypothesys Cut on M(recoil) to reject +-0 RAD + RPI + KPM At least 2pnc one of them with Eg>250MeV Two tracks with balanced charge and closest to IP using info at pca 2 neutral cluster in time, with most energetic assumed to originate from  Eg(recoil) calculated from 2 body kinematics  Using eta decay kinematic we correct Eg(h) Cut on Eg(h) to reject background

  4. Analysis versus EVCL • Stream correlation for MC charged RAD investigated: run RAD, RPI & RAD, KPM & RAD & RPI ALL RAD RPI KPM

  5. Using new approach MC 2005: All Phys, runs 34410-34499 (12.7pb-1) Only RAD stream

  6. Track Selection VS Vertex Selection • Best Results from track selection using PCA at IP parameters Vertex Track

  7. Event Signature in RAD Mh Mppg (MeV) Preselection and Event Signature OLD: 2 PNC + VTX e=46% Lint(2001) =95.7pb-1 NEW: 2 PNC + 2 TRK e=49% Lint(MC2005) =12.7pb-1

  8. Signal/background

  9. Signal/background

  10. Signal/background Opening angle between calculated  and selected neutral cluster from pnc, rejects background

  11. Signal Selection

  12. Two photons invariant mass Measured ALL 0 0  ALL 0 0  Corrected Before cuts ALL 0 0  ALL 0 0  Measured Corrected After cuts

  13. Two photons invariant mass corrected variables ALL 0 0  100 MeV < M< 170 MeV ()=39% Bg=1%

  14. Control Sample 0

  15. Control Sample 0 ALL 0 0 BG 

  16. Outlooks • Analysis in RAD stream: • Ilaria’s cuts to reject BG • Evaluate efficiency • Control sample • Analysis in KPM+RPI stream: • Evaluate efficiency

More Related