1 / 29

Worst-Case TCAM Rule Expansion

Worst-Case TCAM Rule Expansion. AUTHOR : ORI ROTTENSTREICH AND ISSAC KESLASSY PUBLISHER : IEEE INFOCOM 2010 PRESENTER : ZONG-LIN SIE DATE : 2010/09/15. Outline. Introduction Background Range Expansion Guarantees Experimental Result

lamya
Download Presentation

Worst-Case TCAM Rule Expansion

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Worst-Case TCAM Rule Expansion AUTHOR: ORI ROTTENSTREICH AND ISSAC KESLASSY PUBLISHER: IEEE INFOCOM 2010 PRESENTER: ZONG-LIN SIE DATE: 2010/09/15

  2. Outline • Introduction • Background • Range Expansion Guarantees • Experimental Result • Suggested Architectures

  3. Introduction • In this paper , given several type of rules , provide new upper bounds on the TCAM worst-case rule expansions. • For a W-bit range: previously known upon bound:2W-5 TCAMs. this paper’s method provide:W TCAMs. • Also propose a modified TCAM architecture that uses additional logic to significantly reduce the rule expansion.

  4. Background (1/3) • What is TCAM? Ternary Content Addressable Memory. • Packet classification is the core function behind many network application.(routing、filtering…) • Hardware-based TCAMs are the standard devices for high-speed packet classification.

  5. Background (2/3) • What is rule expansion? two types of rules: (1) simple rules:need single entry per rule. (2) range rules:might need many entries per rule. Thus cause rule expansion. for example: range[2,4] means 01* and 100 range[1,14] means 0001,001*,01**,10**,11**,1110

  6. Background (3/3) • However , power consumption constitutes a bottleneck for TCAM scaling. Given same access rate , a TCAM chip consumes up to 30 times more power than equivalent SRAM chip with a software-based solution. • Goal of this paper is to gain a more fundamental understanding of the worst-case number of TCAM entries needed to encode a rule . Provide upper bounds.

  7. Related Work (1/3) • Internal expansion : only uses entries from within the range . W-bit field can be encoded in2W-2 entries for W ≥ 2 . Rule with d fields , can be encoded up to entries . • For instance : W=3 , single field R = [1,6] needs 2W-2 = 4 entries. (see 111 as default)

  8. Related Work (2/3) • The same way but rely on Gray codes instead of binary codes reduce the worst-case internal range expansion from 2W-2 to 2W-4 for sufficient large W. • Using more complex coding , improve to 2W-5 .

  9. Related Work (3/3) • External encoding : the same instance , W=3 , R = [1,6] . we encode the range exterior first , and then the range itself is encoded indirectly. So , only 3 entries!

  10. Range Expansion Guarantees(Model and Notations) • Definition 1(Header) : is a W-bit string defined on the d fields . Each sub-string of length corresponds to field with . • Definition 2(Range Rule) : The range rule in field is defined as an integer range[r1,r2] . r1≤r2 ,both W-bit integers. if xi match , .

  11. Range Expansion Guarantees(Model and Notations) • Definition 3(TCAM entry) :A TCAM entry is composed of a TCAM rule S = , where {0,1} are bit values and * stands for don’t-care , And an action , where A is a set of actions . A W- bit string b = matches S , denoted as , if for all .

  12. Range Expansion Guarantees(Model and Notations) • Ex: R = [1,6] A = {accept ,deny}, ,

  13. Optimal Range Expansion Problem • We want to find a TCAM encoding scheme that minimizes the worst-case TCAM expansion over all possible ranges R .

  14. Optimal Range Expansion Problem • Then the range expansion f(W) is defined as the best-achievable range expansion for W-bit ranges given all encoding schemes , i.e. • To find the range expansion ,we first characterize the extremal range expansion g(W) , which is defined : A range R over is called extremal if R = [0,y] or R = for some arbitrary value of y.

  15. Range Expansion Guarantees • Theorem 1 : for all W ≥ 1 , the extremal range expansion satisfies the following upper-bound : (by induction on W) • example :for W=3 , the extremal range R = [0,6] can encoded with only 2 TCAMs .(111 , ***) This is better than the best internal encoding (0**,10* ,110) ,which use W=3 TCAMs entries.

  16. Range Expansion Guarantees • Theorem 2: for all W≥ 1 , the worst-case range expansion satisfies the following upper-bound: proof: by induction on W ≥ 1. (1) for W = 1 , all non-empty ranges are extremal , therefore , the result follows by Theorem 1. for W = 2 , all non-empty and non-extremal ran- ges are either single points , or[1,2] can be enco- ded in 2 TCAMs.

  17. Range Expansion Guarantees (2) induction step:Now let W ≥ 3 ,and assume the claim true until W – 1. Consider any range , and cut it into 4 sub-ranges. , which and distinguish the following cases:

  18. Range Expansion Guarantees case(1):if , then by induction R can be encoded in at most W-1 entries . case(2):Else if , then this is just a shifted version of the previo- us case and , by lemma 2 ,R can be encoded in at most W-1 entries .

  19. Range Expansion Guarantees case(3) : (a) If is a right –extremal range on , and by lemma 1,can be encoded in g(W-1) TCAM entries . Further by lemma 2 can be encoded in g(W-2) TCAM entries . (b) if can be encoded in g(W-2) TCAM entries , and in g(W-1) TCAM entries .

  20. Range Expansion Guarantees Therefore , in both sub-cases , by theorem 1 , R can be encoded in up to TCAM entries . case(4) : we use 2 different techniques according to the parity of W .

  21. Range Expansion Guarantees

  22. Range Expansion Guarantees

  23. Range Expansion Guarantees • Exponential Number of TCAM Entries: Theorem 4: For any classification rule R = of d fields , there is an encoding scheme • Linear Number of TCAM Entries Theorem 5:Any classification rule R on d fields can be encoded in at most d.W TCAM entries with- out any additional logic.

  24. Range Expansion Guarantees • Example of linear number entries: we first negatively encode the four striped regions , using an encoding of four one-dimensional extremal intervals , 4W . And a default positive entry . Total 4W+1 .

  25. Experimental Result • Internal binary-prefix approach 2W-2 = 14. • Suggested scheme W = 8.

  26. Suggested Architecture (1/3) • Standard INTERNAL –RRODUCT Assume d=2 ,W=4 ,k=2 R1 = [1,14] ×[5,14] R2 = [7,10] ×[2,3] use 6×5 to encode R1 use 3×1 to encode R2 total 33 entries

  27. Suggested Architecture (2/3) • Proposed COMBINED-PRODUCT (using complementary to encode , upper bound W) Assume d=2 ,W=4 ,k=2 R1 = [1,14] ×[5,14] R2 = [7,10] ×[2,3] use 12 to encode R1 use 3 to encode R2 total 15 entries

  28. Suggested Architecture (3/3) • Proposed COMBINED-SUM (each field of each range is encoded separately) Assume d=2 ,W=4 ,k=2 R1 = [1,14] ×[5,14] R2 = [7,10] ×[2,3] use 3+4 to encode R1 use 3+1 to encode R2 total 11 entries

  29. Suggested Architecture

More Related