270 likes | 390 Views
E97-110: Small Angle GDH Experimental Status Report. Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology Hall A Collaboration Meeting December 15 th , 2011. Motivation.
E N D
E97-110: Small Angle GDHExperimental Status Report Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology Hall A Collaboration Meeting December 15th, 2011
Motivation • Precision measurement of the moments of spin structure functions at low Q2, 0.02 to 0.24 GeV2 for the neutron (3He) • Covered an unmeasured region of kinematics to test theoretical calculations (Chiral Perturbation theory) • Complements data from experiment E94-010 covered region from 0.1 to 0.9 GeV2 • Finalizing systematic uncertainties and first publication
Experiment E97-110 • Inclusive experiment: • Scattering angles of 6◦ and 9◦ • Polarized electron beam: Avg. Pbeam= 75% • Pol. 3He target (para & perp): Avg. Ptarg = 40% • Measured polarized cross-section differences M. Amarianet al., PRL 89, 242301 (2002)
Current Work • Waiting on final target polarization (J. Singh) • Elastic 3He analysis (V. Laine) • 2.1 GeV asymmetry and cross section completed • Now working on 2.8 GeV data set • Finalize acceptance (V. Sulkosky) • Radiative Corrections • Preliminary done by J. Singh; code now available • Tim Holmstrom working on it • Estimation of QE contribution to neutron results (V. Sulkosky)
9o Acceptance • Difficulty: • Saturation effect is present • A few settings were mistuned with the septum magnet • tg-acceptance appears squeezed at the highest field settings • Varying acceptance cuts does not help Septum Mistuned 15% uncertainty
Interpolation • || 3.6% • Removed edge bins with a secondary process • Corrected remaining edge imperfections with • a secondary acceptance correction • The interpolation method works, but there is a concern • about the adjacent momentum settings. • Carbon cross section analysisto verify the absolute • normalization of the data.
Tools for Carbon Cross Sections • Single carbon foil data were taken for each of the momentum settings for E = 3.775 GeV • Single Arm Monte-Carlo (SAMC) from A. Deur • Uses John LeRose transport functions at 9º and apertures • Program complied with QFS subroutines to perform radiative corrections: internal and external • Program utilizes the parameterized cross section for A> 2 from P. Bosted: https://userweb.jlab.org/~bosted/F1F209.f • Elastic radiative tail was removed using Rosetail averaged over the solid angle acceptance of E97-110
Septum Entrance Apertures • Shift large angle side • by 7mm • Shift small angle side • by 5 mm
Summary • Work is progressing • Acceptance analysis to be completed soon • More work needs to go into radiative corrections: • Smoothing of the data completed (T. Holmstrom) • Finite acceptance for elastic tail subtraction • Model for the two lowest energies • Draft of first paper completed and internally circulated
Axial Anomaly and the LTPuzzle N. Kochelev and Y. Oh; arXiv:1103.4891v1
Analysis Status • Preliminary results for the moments have been extracted at constant Q2. • Collimator background is mostly from polarized 3He • Need to estimate size of leakage into physics asymmetry • Issues and analysis still in progress: • Almost final target polarizations (J. Singh) Waiting to receive final numbers very soon. • Elastic analysis as a cross check of systematics (V. Laine) • 2.1 GeV completed; working on other energies now • Acceptance: very messy but making steady progress • Finalize radiative corrections (J. Singh, T. Holmstrom& V. S.)
Updated SAMC Code • Work done by V. Laine` • SAMC rewritten in C++ from Fortran • Improved implementation of target collimator cuts • Raster correction by calculating electron’s travel length through the cell • Radiative corrections made for each material separately (previously done all at once) • Default units now in meter, gram, GeV and radian instead of cm and mrad
Cross Section Smoothing 3.319 GeV, 9o Work by T. Holmstrom 4.404 GeV, 9o
Delta Acceptance E94-010 • Flat region of • -acceptance • is much smaller • with Septum • Simulation is not • perfect on the • falling edges E97-110
6o Acceptance Solutions • || 3.6% • Removed edge bins with a secondary process • Corrected remaining edge imperfections with • a secondary acceptance correction
9-Degree Acceptance • More painful: • Saturation effect is present • A few settings were mistuned with the septum magnet • tg-acceptance appears squeezed at the highest field settings
Variation of Acceptance Cuts Varying acceptance cuts does not help
Elastic Asymmetry Analysis Work by V. Laine`
3He Elastic Acceptance Delta ytg W-M
Elastic Cross Section Analysis Average 10 A; VDC 19% multi-tracks Work by V. Laine`