1 / 18

Main parameters of Russian Tier2 for ATLAS

Russia-CERN JWGC meeting 09.10.05 A.Minaenko IHEP (Protvino). Main parameters of Russian Tier2 for ATLAS. Main Tier-2 tasks. Tier-0, Tiers-1: storage of all data types (Raw, ESD, AOD, SIM), event reconstruction, ESD and AOD production, main bulk of calibration

lana-bradley
Download Presentation

Main parameters of Russian Tier2 for ATLAS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Russia-CERN JWGC meeting 09.10.05 A.Minaenko IHEP (Protvino) Main parameters of Russian Tier2 for ATLAS

  2. Main Tier-2 tasks • Tier-0, Tiers-1: storage of all data types (Raw, ESD, AOD, SIM), event reconstruction, ESD and AOD production, main bulk of calibration • The main Tier-2 task is providing facilities for physics analysis using mainly AOD, DPD and user derived data formats • It includes also development of reconstruction algorithms using subsets of ESD and Raw • All the data used for analysis should be stored on disks and some unique data (user, group DPD) to be stored on tapes also as well as previous AOD/DPD versions

  3. Main Tier-2 tasks • The second important task is a production and storage of MC simulated data • The ATLAS computing model implies that simulated data are stored mainly in Tiers-1 but Russian Tier-2 proposes to take the responsibility for the locally produced MC data • This implies that the proper modes of access to the data to be granted and the data should be backed-up on the tapes • Participation in calibration/alignment activity can be considered if there will be interest from Russian groups

  4. Data taking conditions and data sizes • Luminosity • 0.5*1033 cm-2sec-1 in 2007 • 2.0*1033 cm-2sec-1 in 2008, 2009 • 1034 cm-2sec-1 in 1010 and after • Event rate 200 events/sec • Event numbers 109 in 2007, 2*109 each next year • Raw 1.6 MB/event • ESD 0.5 MB/event • AOD 0.1 MB/event • RawSim 2.0 MB/event • Reconstruction 15 kSI2k*sec/event • Simulation 200 kSI2k*sec/event • Analysis 0.5 kSI2k*sec/event • Luminosity increase in 2010 leads to the event size increase by 50% and reconstruction time by 75%

  5. Evolution of Raw, ESD, AOD sizes in ATLAS

  6. Cost table 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Disc (CHF/GB) 3.14 1.96 1.22 0.77 0.48 0.3 0.19 ATape (CHF/GB) 2.5 1.25 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.4 CPU (CHF/SI2k) 0.67 0.44 0.3 0.19 0.14 0.09 0.06 Used lifetimes for the different types of resources: • CPU - 3 years • Disk - 4 years • Tape - 5 years Commissioning: • 80% of the resources 2007 are moved to 2006 • 30% of the resources 2008 are moved to 2007

  7. Resources for simulation • Number of events – 20% of real data • Contribution of RuTier-2 to total statistics of all MC data – 10% • Efficiency of CPU usage – 85% • All types of data to be saved on automated tapes • All ESD, AOD and 20% of Raw simulated data to be kept on disks permanently

  8. Tables with simulation resources Simulation resources evolution 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 RAW (TB) 0 40 120 200 320 440 560 ESD (TB) 0 10 30 50 80 110 140 AOD (TB) 0 2 6 10 16 22 28 Disc (TB) 16 32 60 100 160 220 280 Tape (TB) 42 83 156 260 416 572 728 CPU (kSI2k) 128 209 321 321 321 321 321 Simulation resources yearly increase 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Disc (TB) 16 16 28 40 76 76 88 Tape (TB) 42 42 73 104 156 198 198 CPU (kSI2k) 128 80 112 128 80 112 128 Disc (kCHF) 50 31 34 31 36 23 17 Tape (kCHF) 104 52 66 62 62 79 79 CPU (kCHF) 86 35 34 24 11 10 8 Total (kCHF) 240 119 133 118 110 112 104

  9. Evolution of disk, tape, CPU (kSi2k) simulation resources at RuTier-2

  10. Yearly costs of added disk, tape and CPU simulation resources at RuTier-2

  11. Resources for physics analysis • Number of active users – 50 • 5% of total Raw data and 10% of ESD are permanently kept of disks to be used for algorithm developments and analysis • Volume of group DPD data is equal to 50% of AOD data • Volume of user data – 1 TB per user for 2008 data only and varies proportionally to events number • CPU power needed to analyze 2008 data only by one user – 15 kSI2k • Total CPU power is proportional to the number of accumulated events and to the number of users: float CPU = Nuser*(Nev_year[i]/Nev_year[2008])*CPU_user_2008;

  12. Evolution of disk, tape, CPU (kSi2k) analysis resources at RuTier-2

  13. Yearly costs of added disk, tape and CPU analysis resources at RuTier-2

  14. Evolution of disk, tape, CPU (kSi2k) total resources at RuTier-2

  15. Yearly costs of added disk, tape and CPU total resources at RuTier-2

  16. Summary • RuTier-2 for ATLAS – distributed computing centre shared with other LHC experiments • Expected parameters for 2008 are • Disks 830 TB • Tapes 230 TB • CPU 1450 kSI2k • Provides facilities for physics analysis of data by 50 active users and MC simulation of 10% of ATLAS simulated data • Important feature – linear rise of practically all resources proportionally to the accumulated statistics • Commissioning: 80% of 2007 resources are moved to 2006, 30% of 2008 resources are moved to 2007 • Institutes: BINP (Novosibirsk), IHEP (Protvino), ITEP (Moscow), JINR (Dubna), PNPI (Gatchina), SINP (Moscow)

More Related