1 / 11

The Gerlach & Ely Model (1980)

The Gerlach & Ely Model (1980). A Critique by Ooksang Cho September 27, 2007 EDCI 513. Outline. Conceptual/Theoretical Base. Operational Aspect. ADDIE Component. Edmonds Component. Exemplar Practice. Personal Perspectives. Conceptual Base. Design. Develop. Evaluate. Need

lance
Download Presentation

The Gerlach & Ely Model (1980)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Gerlach & Ely Model (1980) A Critique by Ooksang Cho September 27, 2007 EDCI 513

  2. Outline Conceptual/Theoretical Base Operational Aspect ADDIE Component Edmonds Component Exemplar Practice Personal Perspectives

  3. Conceptual Base Design Develop Evaluate Need Assessment Identify Objectives Test Prototype Setting Analysis Method Selection Formative Evaluation Organize Management Construct A Prototype Implement Special Media Institutes Consortium (Syracuse, Southern California, Oregon State System and Michigan State)

  4. Theoretical Base Communication Theory Learning Theory Cognitive Psychomotor Affective

  5. Operational Aspect 4 1 5 3 9 6 7 2 10 8

  6. Exemplar Learning & Teaching Specify contents and objectives 1 Specify entering point of learners 2 Five activities 3 Example> Math Class at university level Subject: Integral Calculus Evaluation 4

  7. ADDIE Components Analysis Design Development Implementation Evaluation

  8. Edmonds Components Orientation Knowledge Structure Expertise Level Structure Context Level

  9. Comparison and Contrast IPDM System Oriented Model Gerlach & Ely Classroom Oriented Model ADDIE Product Oriented Model

  10. Personal Perspectives(Advantages & Disadvantages) Advantage Disadvantage Uniformity Systematic Structure Plan of teaching Novice Teacher Adaptability

  11. References Edmonds, G., Branch, R., Mukherjee, P. (1994). A conceptual framework for comparing instructional design models. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(4), 55-72. Fauser, M., Henry, K., & Norman, D. K. ( 2006) Comparison of alternative instructional design models. University of Central Florida. Gerlach, V.S., & Ely, D.P. (1980). Teaching & Media: A systematic Approach (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Incorporated. Reiser, R.A., & Dempsey, J.V. (Eds.). (2007). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. Tyler, L (2006, September 23) Educational theories and instructional design models. Their place in simulation. Retrieved from http://www.siaa.asn.au/get/2396672209.pdf.

More Related