1 / 22

1. Mole Valley 2010/11 Budget Councillor Ben Tatham Portfolio Holder for Finance and Assets

1. Mole Valley 2010/11 Budget Councillor Ben Tatham Portfolio Holder for Finance and Assets. 2. Surrey Councils. 3. MV District Council:. Refuse collection and recycling 2 sports centres, 2 day centres, Dorking Halls Planning Policy and Development Control

landers
Download Presentation

1. Mole Valley 2010/11 Budget Councillor Ben Tatham Portfolio Holder for Finance and Assets

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 1. Mole Valley 2010/11 Budget Councillor Ben Tatham Portfolio Holder for Finance and Assets

  2. 2. Surrey Councils

  3. 3. MV District Council: • Refuse collection and recycling • 2 sports centres, 2 day centres, Dorking Halls • Planning Policy and Development Control • Building control, Environmental Health and Licensing • Housing and homelessness • Car parking • Street cleaning, graffiti, fly tipping and abandoned cars • Parks and playing fields • Local, National and European elections • Housing and Council Tax benefits - £18m per year • Collect Council Tax and Business Rates • Community alarm and Dial-a-ride

  4. 4. County council: • Roads and verges • Public Transport coordination and subsidy • Education • Social Care • Libraries • Fire and rescue service

  5. 5. The Whole of Mole Valley 2009/10allocation of Council Tax £43.8million (76%) County Council £7.8million (13%) Surrey Police £6.2 million (11%) Mole Valley (including parishes) £57.8 million

  6. 7. Business Rates£35.7m collected in 2008/09 on behalf of central government£3.5m or 9.8% redistributed back to Mole ValleyIn 2008/09, only 44% of business rates collected in Surrey was redistributed back to Councils and the Police

  7. 8. Income and Expenditure 2008/09 MVDC Total Spend: £30m Funded by: Capital Resources (£ 5m) Service Income & Grants (£19m) Net cost £ 6m Funded by: Council Tax £ 6m

  8. 13. New factors increasing costs in 2010/11 • £’000 pa • Loss of car parking income 250 • General price inflation 132 • Increased take up, concessionary fares 120 • Increased energy costs 68 • Reduced Building & Development Control income 66 • Pensions back-funding 43 • Other Costs (Dorking Halls, Pippbrook House, phones) 52 • Loss of investment interest 571 • Total 1,302

  9. 14. The Solution (5% Council Tax increases) Expenditure (without savings) Target Budget (with savings) Total income Reserves £4m Council Tax 5% Govt Grant Interest

  10. 15. 2010/11 Revenue Budget Headlines • Zero % Council Tax increase proposed • 0.5% government grant increase • Interest rates of 2.0% assumed • £1.8m of reserves used to balance the budget • Maintain minimum revenue reserves of £1.3m

  11. 16. 2009-2011 savings - headlines • 2nd year of 3 year savings programme comprising: • 2009/10 service savings of £0.6m pa • 2009/10 Fees & Charges review - £0.4m pa • 2010/11 Options Appraisals savings (on what we do) of £0.5m • Property review - £0.2m pa by 2011/12 • Procurement initiatives - £0.22m pa by 2011/12 • Leisure Centre outsourcing - £0.4m pa by 2011/12 • Business Process Review Programme (how we do things) – • £1m pa saving by 2011/12, £2.3m investment • In total, 3 year savings programme of over £3m

  12. 17. 2010/11 Options Appraisals • £000 • Community Transport – reduce 3 bus days 14 • Handyman – increase charges and charge for materials 5 • Gypsy sites – 3 more pitches 8 • Environmental Health – reduce animal wardens & pest control 46 • Housing – Church Gardens lease 14 • Food & Safety – reduce officer hours 6 • Training & equipment 8 • Parks & open spaces – reduced litter picks, change bedding displays 30 • Depot – rationalise following stock transfer 10 • Sustainability – reduced use of consultants 10

  13. 18. 2010/11 Options Appraisals (cont.) • £000 • Recycling – remove glass bring sites 20 • Street cleaning – reduce leaf clearing and reservation cleans 30 • Communications – reduce MV News issues & officer hours 50 • Leisure development – arts, sports & youth reductions 20 • Grants – reductions for leisure & community groups 20 • Leisure marketing / advertising – budget reduction 5 • Partnerships – budget reduction 5 • Financial Services – treasury management all in-house, reduce audit 36 • Estates – reduce bus shelter repair, charge for street names 17 • Committee Services & IT– cease webcasting 19

  14. 19. 2010/11 Options Appraisals (cont.) • £000 • Policy – reduce emergency planning budget 2 • Facilities – Reduced cleaning and plants 6 • HR – cease South East Employers membership 4 • Economic development – Reduce TCM and visitor information 57 • Building control – increase charges 10 • Conservation – reduce budget 20 • Development Control – misc. savings 13 • Total 484

  15. 20. 2010/11 Capital Programme £8.7m budget, highlights of which are: • Remaining £3.7m on Leatherhead Leisure Centre • £1.3m Affordable Housing • £0.8m asset enhancement and renewal • £0.4m KGV playing fields, Holmwood • £0.4m Leatherhead Night Hostel • £0.4m Brockham Big Field football pavilion • £0.3m Food waste recycling • £0.15m property options appraisals • Approximately £0.8m of ‘new’ additional capital funding added to the programme (none in 2009/10)

  16. 21. Future Financial Threats • Pension Fund – value has fallen and there is a statutory duty to fully fund. • Central Government Funding – regardless of the election result this will almost certainly be cut

  17. 22. Summary • The administration has improved the Council’s budgetary position by over £3m circa 25% of net revenue budget • Because of this and recognising the current economic difficulties of residents and communities, a zero council tax is intended to be set for 2010/11 • The future is difficult but the above demonstrates you can trust us with your money

More Related