210 likes | 371 Views
China‘s Rise as a Global Economic Superpower: Challenges for the EU. Rafael Leal-Arcas. Global economic superpower : Criteria (Bergsten). 1) must be large enough to significantly affect the world economy; 2) must be sufficiently dynamic to contribute meaningfully to global growth;
E N D
China‘s Rise as a Global Economic Superpower: Challenges for the EU Rafael Leal-Arcas
Global economic superpower : Criteria (Bergsten) • 1) must be large enough to significantly affect the world economy; • 2) must be sufficiently dynamic to contribute meaningfully to global growth; • 3) must be open enough to trade and capital flows to have a major impact on other countries.
China: a historically unique global economic superpower • because: • 1) it is still a poor country with a GDP/capita of around $6,000; US= $48,000; EU= $34,000 (source: CIA) • 2) not yet a democracy; • 3) not yet a market economy.
historically unique global economic superpower • China’s rapidly growing economic, political, and cultural engagement and influence in today’s world is both undeniable and remarkable • but China’s rise is not yet at the level of global power of the U.S. in 20th century or UK in 19th century.
Outline • I. Thesis: China’s attitude to multilateralism and responsibility in global economic governance is questionable • II. China’s preference for regionalism • III. China’s position at the WTO • IV. EC-China PCA • V. Conclusion
I. Argument • attitude to multilateralism and responsibility in global ec governance is questionable or unclear • E.g.: results of July 2008 WTO Mini-ministerial conference • China seems to be more interested in regionalism
Former Gral Secr CCP Deng Xiaoping on China in int’l affairs • “Observe calmly; secure our position; cope with affairs calmly; hide our capacities and bide our time; be good at maintaining a low profile; and never claim leadership.” • China seeks to focus on its own internal development
II. China’s questionable attitude to multilateralism • attempts to establish itself as a gravity center in Asia • Concludes many low-quality, politically motivated bilateral FTAs in the region. • strategy: creation of a powerful Asian trading bloc (EAFTA), as prima donna.
Examples of China’s regionalism • China-ASEAN FTA (in effect by 2010 for 6 ASEAN MS and 2015, remaining 4) • China-Singapore FTA • China-Philippines investment agts • Various agts with Mekong Delta countries • China: serious about multilateralism?
Regionalism in Finance • IMF-like East Asian reserve fund • China: bossing its trade partners to use renminbi instead of $ • makes use of its strategic location to extend influence in eco development for market access in SE Asia • Reactions to China’s success: • -Jp’s econ partnership with ASEAN • -India: FTAs with various ASEAN countries
III. China at WTO: Backseat • insists on keeping the status of a developing country despite its size both economically (3rd) and demographically (1st). • But, is not just any developing country; China is not Guatemala • Yet, to justify its passive role at WTO, “recently acceded members“ category
Backseat at WTO • Compared to Brazil and India (NLPs), China plays timid role both in the Doha round and in the WTO’s DSS. • E.g.: only brought 4 cases before the WTO as complainant, compared to > 15 cases by India and > 20 by Brazil.
Reasons for China’s passivity at WTO • a rather young WTO member • needs to improve skills and competences on WTO matters • Culturally, tends to avoid disputes (influence from Confucius) • rather inefficient bureaucracy • Wants all benefits but no obligations?
IV. EC-China PCA • EC= China’s largest trading partner • Trade and econ coop agt since 1985 • Negotiations for a PCA started Jan 07 • But, FTA not on the horizon • Would ostracize other EC trade partners
Difficulties in EC-China trade • Protection of IPRs • Counterfeiting and product piracy • Product safety concerns • Ballooning bilat trade deficit • China’s undervalued currency • China’s delay in enforcing WTO rules • Unfair subsidies to favored national industr
Ways to improve EC-China trade relations • Dialogues: • -1st High Level eco and trade dialogue (2008): investmt, market access, IPR protection • 2nd HED (May 09): improve product safety • Cooperation (for future): • -launch of coop program on IPR protection • -creation of IPR helpdesk for EU businesses in China
Conclusion • attitude of China to multilateralism and responsibility in global ec governance is unclear • appears to lack an internationalist view to world trade affairs; more focused on regionalism • should assume more responsibility multilaterally. Why? B/c with greater power and a greater voice comes greater responsibility.