250 likes | 357 Views
Clustering of breed types : Preliminary results. Anette van Dorland. ILRI, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 26 February 2003. Introduction. 1. Large number of unknown breed types: How different/similar are these breed types from each other ? 2. Farmers knowledge versus enumerator observation.
E N D
Clustering of breed types: Preliminary results Anette van Dorland ILRI, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 26 February 2003
Introduction 1. Large number of unknown breed types: How different/similar are these breed types from each other ? 2. Farmers knowledge versus enumerator observation Multivariate techniques
Approach I: • Grouping of entities based on the multivariate similarities among the entities • No prior information of the formed groups available Cluster analysis Approach II: • Grouping of entities based on the multivariate similarities among the entities • Prior information of the formed groups available Discriminant analysis Introduction (cont.)
Bore Hagere Mariam Liben Teltele Dire Borana Zone • Data on cattle from Borana Zone • Five woreda’s selected (see map) • Three woreda’s predominantly in lowland (Dire, Liben and Teltele) • Two woreda’s predominantly in highland (Bore and Hagere Mariam) Oromia Region Borana Zone
Data and Methodology • 209 records on breed types • 26 qualitative variables on phenotypic characteristics • First step: Principal Components Analysis • Second step: Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering (AHC) • Mahalanobis’ distance (dissimilarity) • Strong linkage as aggregation criteria
Characteristic Back profile Coat colour-body Rump profile Coat colour-head Ear size Coat colour-ears Coat colour-tail Ear shape Coat colour-hoof Ear orientation Coat pattern Horn length Hair type Horn shape Horn orientation Hair size Frame size Horn spacing Dewlap size Tail length Udder size Hump size Teat size Hump shape Face profile Navel flap size Principal Components Analysis 10 principal components responsible for 64 % of the variation between the observations
Contributions of the variables (%) Principal Components Analysis (cont.)
Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Cluster 3 Dissimilarity Dendrogram (cont.) (11 observations) (70 observations) (128 observations)
40 35 30 25 % of households 20 15 10 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Coat colour combination of body Coat colour of body: cluster 1
25 20 15 % of households 10 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Coat colour combination of body Coat colour of body: cluster 2
25 20 15 % of households 10 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Coat colour combination of body Coat colour of body: cluster 3
Cluster 2 ‘Borana’ group ? ‘Guji’ group Cluster 3 Suggestion Cluster 1 Dissimilarity
Breed type Arsi Borana Guji Konso Ogaden ArsixBorana BoranaxGuji Borana Zone BoranaxKonso Unknown Distribution of breed types (farmers’ knowledge)
Conclusions • Multivariate techniques can be used for on-farm breed characterization work by classifying the observations on individual animals into well-defined breed types/strains • Multivariate techniques can help formulating hypotheses, which can be tested using detailed genetic studies • Multivariate techniques can facilitate more focused genetic studies including molecular biology