320 likes | 406 Views
Use of Force. Self-Defense Defense of Others Good Samaritan Laws. Deadly Force. Force which reasonably can be expected to cause DEATH or SERIOUS BODILY INJURY. Force CANNOT Be Used:. When not immediately necessary When the level is unreasonable Against lawful acts.
E N D
Use of Force • Self-Defense • Defense of Others • Good Samaritan Laws
Deadly Force Force which reasonably can be expected to cause DEATH or SERIOUS BODILY INJURY
Force CANNOT Be Used: • When not immediately necessary • When the level is unreasonable • Against lawful acts
Force CANNOT Be Used: • Based on fear of future harm • For retaliation/punishment
Use of Force • Act must be UNLAWFUL • Force must be NECESSARY • Level of force must be REASONABLE
What is “Reasonable”? Courts consider: • Size • Age • Gender • Unlawful Act • Weapon • Circumstances
Use of Force Is there a duty to retreat?
Loss of Self-Defense Privilege If you start it, generally, you can’t claim self-defense.
Defense of Dwellings “A man’s home is his castle.” Generally, there is no duty to retreat.
Defense of Dwellings Presumption that a homeowner has a reasonable fear of imminent peril or death
Defense of Property: Historically • On the frontier, many items were necessary for survival • Loss of high-value items could be devastating • Law enforcement officers were seldom readily available
Defense of Property: Today • Most items can be quickly replaced • Many high-value items are insured • Law enforcement readily available
Defense of Property: Today • You Can’t shoot somebody for taking your “stuff”! • No Booby Traps
Defense of Property A possessor of land cannot do indirectly and by a mechanical device that which, were he present, he could not do immediately and in person. - Restatement of Torts, Section 85, p. 180
Police Use of Force • Detention • Arrest • Search • Overcome Resistance • Prevent Escape or Re-Capture • Protection
U.S. Constitution5th Amendment “No person shall… be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.”
Key Decisions Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985) Graham v. Conner, 109 S.Ct. 1865 (1989)
U.S. Constitution4th Amendment “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,…”
Force Response • Presence • Dialogue • Escort Techniques • Pain Compliance • Striking Techniques • Impact Weapon • Deadly Force
Force Response • Presence • Dialogue • Escort Techniques • Pain Compliance • Striking Techniques • Impact Weapon • Deadly Force
Force Response • Presence • Dialogue • Escort Techniques • Pain Compliance • Striking Techniques • Impact Weapon • Deadly Force
Force Response • Presence • Dialogue • Escort Techniques • Pain Compliance • Striking Techniques • Impact Weapon • Deadly Force
Force Response • Presence • Dialogue • Escort Techniques • Pain Compliance • Striking Techniques • Impact Weapon • Deadly Force
Force Response • Presence • Dialogue • Escort Techniques • Pain Compliance • Striking Techniques • Impact Weapon • Deadly Force
Force Response • Presence • Dialogue • Escort Techniques • Pain Compliance • Striking Techniques • Impact Weapon • Deadly Force
Force Response • Presence • Dialogue • Escort Techniques • Pain Compliance • Striking Techniques • Impact Weapon • Deadly Force
Force Response • Presence • Dialogue • Escort Techniques • Pain Compliance • Striking Techniques • Impact Weapon • Deadly Force
Deadly Force Force which reasonably can be expected to cause DEATH or SERIOUS BODILY INJURY
Police Use of Deadly Force Intent is to STOP, not KILL! Officer must reasonably believe the suspect poses an imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury to the officer or others. - Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985) - TCA 39-11-620