1 / 26

Renal Replacement Therapy for Acute Renal Failure

Renal Replacement Therapy for Acute Renal Failure. Timothy E. Bunchman Professor Pediatrics. Infant ARF Single RRT Modality. Ronco et al; Intens Care Med, 1995 45% survival-CRRT Sadowski et al; KI 1995 primary renal disease 71%-HD secondary renal disease 33%-HD.

lanza
Download Presentation

Renal Replacement Therapy for Acute Renal Failure

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Renal Replacement Therapy for Acute Renal Failure Timothy E. Bunchman Professor Pediatrics

  2. Infant ARF Single RRT Modality • Ronco et al; Intens Care Med, 1995 • 45% survival-CRRT • Sadowski et al; KI 1995 • primary renal disease 71%-HD • secondary renal disease 33%-HD

  3. Pediatric ARF Single RRT Modality • Niaudet et al; KI, 1985 • 80% survival-primary ARF all RRT • Zobel et al; Ped Neph, 1989 • 65% survival-CRRT • Zobel et al; Contrib Neph, 1991 • 60% survival-CAVH, • 35%-survival- CVVH

  4. Pediatric ARF Single RRT Modality • Paret et al; J Thor Cardiovas Surg , 1992 • 33% survival-CAVH • Gallego et al; Nephron, 1993 • 52% survival with PD/HD • features of poorer prognosis • less then 1 mos of age • hypotension

  5. Pediatric ARF Single RRT Modality • Bradbury et al; Arch Dis Child, 1994 • 33% survival-CVVH • Latta et al; Ped Neph, 1994 • 37% survival-CAVH • Smoyer et al; JASN, 1995 • 43% survival-CRRT

  6. Pediatric ARF Comparison of RRT modalities • Fleming et al; J Thor Cardiovas Surg, 1995 • 38% survival-PD • 33% survival-CAVH • 42% survival-CVVH • Maxvold et al; Am J Kid Dis, 1997 • 43% survival-CVVH • 83% survival-HD

  7. Pediatric ARF Comparison of RRT modalities • Lowrie et al; Ped Neph, 2000 • evaluation of PD vs CVVHF in children with MOSF • survival equal but related to disease state and the number of organs non functioning

  8. Adult ARF Comparison of RRT modalities • Kruczynski et al; ASAIO, 1993 • 75% Survival-CAVH; 18% survival-HD • Bellomo et al; ASAIO, 1993 • 40% Survival-CRRT; 30% survival-HD • van Brommel et al: Am J Neph, 1995 • 43% Survival-CRRT; 59% survival-HD

  9. New Dialysis Patients 1992-1998 (total 354)

  10. Demographics

  11. Modality of Choice at onset

  12. Diagnosis

  13. ARF-282 patients • Time on therapy • HF-8.7 days • HD-9.5 days • PD-9.6 days NS • Heparin Free Therapies • HF-51% • HD-28% < 0.01

  14. Survivors: Analysis by weight NS

  15. Survivors: Analysis byBP at onset p < 0.01 NS

  16. Survivors: Analysis by use of Pressors p < 0.01

  17. Survivors: Analysis by RRT modality NS NS NS p < 0.01

  18. Survivors: Analysis by RRT modality and weight NS NS NS Kg p < 0.05

  19. Survivors: Analysis by Diagnosis and RRT Modality

  20. Analysis by Diagnosis RRT Modality and Pressors P < 0.01 vs HF or PD

  21. Survivors: Analysis by Diagnosis and RRT Modality

  22. Analysis by Diagnosis RRT Modality and Pressors p < 0.01 vs HF or PD (ARF/Liv Tx)

  23. Survivors: Analysis by Diagnosis and RRT Modality

  24. Analysis by Diagnosis RRT Modality and Pressors

  25. RRT for ARF • Best RRT is one that’s continuous, done with ease, and minimizes risk of hypotension, access complications, infectious risk, or coagulation risk • Best local standard is the best modality • Nutritional needs of the child need to be factored in and adjusted for RRT modality

  26. RRT for ARF • Survival is related to diagnosis, hypotension, use of pressor agents and PRISM scores and may be influenced by RRT choice • ARF management needs to be a cooperative effort between Nephrologists and Intensivists for the optimal care of children

More Related