1 / 65

Coen van der Krogt Product Sales Manager December 9, 2010 c.krogt@elsevier

Innovative Ways to Support Researchers and Research Management SciVal Spotlight. Coen van der Krogt Product Sales Manager December 9, 2010 c.krogt@elsevier.com. Multidisciplinarity. Competition / Collaboration. High mobility. Accountability / Government policies.

lapis
Download Presentation

Coen van der Krogt Product Sales Manager December 9, 2010 c.krogt@elsevier

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Innovative Ways to Support Researchers and Research Management SciVal Spotlight Coen van der Krogt Product Sales Manager December 9, 2010 c.krogt@elsevier.com

  2. Multidisciplinarity Competition / Collaboration High mobility Accountability / Government policies Multiple Trends Impact The Research Landscape Improve research outcomes Research Strategy & Research Performance

  3. Agenda • Scopus • Supporting Researchers • Supporting Performance Evaluation • Basis for analytical and workflow tools from the SciVal suite • SciVal Spotlight Supporting Research Management

  4. Scopus - Most comprehensive Abstracts and Citations database Secure institutional success . . . Increased prestige, ranking and funding because you . . . . . . thereby unlocking the library’s full potential enabled by . . . • Best evaluation of performance and quality: • Broadest coverage of peer-reviewed, high quality journals • Globally as well as locally • More accurate citation count, fairer recognition for work . . . improve your institutional productivity . . . . . . and (c) provides access to the most comprehensive content . . . • Improve productivity of Researcher and Student: • Most efficient and effective search • Access to most comprehensive content . . . by enabling the management to make better decisions . . . . . . (b) offers you the most efficient and effective search . . . . . . and improving student and researcher productivity . . . …because Scopus (a) enables you to evaluate performance and quality accurately . . .

  5. % Scopus has significantly more journals in its database than WoS WoS total: 11,419 Scopus total: 19,981 Unique Scopus titles: 9,458 Unique WoS titles: 896 Joint titles: 10,523 Year 2010 Source: JISC Collections Academic Database

  6. 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 5000 2500 0 Scopus has a large article coverage per subject area Scopus versus WoS content coverage (number of journals) Web of Science Scopus Biomedical & Clinical Research Mathematics, Information& Communication Sciences Engineering & environmental Sciences Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences Biological Sciences and Biotechnology Social, Behavioural & Economic Sciences Public and Health Services Humanities & creative arts

  7. a perfect global coverage Scopus versus WoS geographical coverage (number of journals) Web of Science Scopus 2,000 2,000 8,000 8,000 1,000 1,000 4,000 4,000 Less than 10% of our nearest competitor’s journals come from outside North America and Western Europe Scopus has more than 20% of its journals from outside this region 0 0 0 0 500 600 300 250 300 150 0 0 0 Scopus covers “local” content for local audiences and for audiences who want to know what is happening elsewhere

  8. Example: higher coverage of local journals from Croatia in Scopus 78 active titles (total 104, including 26 inactive titles) +229% (active titles) January 2010 Figures

  9. Journal Evaluation – some challenges: I’m a publishing author in a niche area, how can I compare with researchers in another scientific field? How can I get a value that reflects citation behaviour in my research area? It’s 2010 – why can I only get a ranking relevant to 2008? Where can I find the data that have been used to generate this number? The Impact Factor does not cover the journal I’m publishing in. What now? Summary: Difficult to compare Not recent enough Lack of clarity of data origin Lack of coverage

  10. January 2010: 2 new journal metrics in Scopus - SJR and SNIP SJR - SCImago Journal Rank SNIP - Source-Normalized Impact per Paper • Comparison Normalization of differences between fields • Recent Refreshed twice per year: April and September • Data origin Eliminates risk of manipulation • Coverage All 19,000+ journals, proceedings and book series in Scopus receiveSJR and SNIP values • www.journalmetrics.com

  11. Journal Analyzer in Scopus

  12. The Research Landscape is changing ...Elsevier Is Changing With You • Solutions based on Scopus • Supporting Research Management

  13. Positioning Overview: SciVal Suite Performance & Evaluation Demonstration of Expertise Network Research Support AGGREGATION Institution/Country Researcher/Group Institution Researcher Spotlight Strata Showcase Expert Profiling Scopus-EP-VIVO Funding SciVerse Scopus PRIMARY BUYER PRIMARY USER ADDRESSABLE CUSTOMER CHALLENGES

  14. PRIMARY CUSTOMER GOAL(S) SUPPORTED BY THE SUITE

  15. SciVal Spotlight

  16. WHAT IS SPOTLIGHT ? 1. Definition: • Spotlight is a web based solution to identify the institutional research strengths. With the aim to assess the institutionalstrategy of research management • It is NOT an evaluation tool for authors or papers 2. What we define as a research strength (competency)? • Areas of research (multi- or single-discipline) where our institution has a significant quantity of papers (from one or more authors) published during the last 5 years • So some highly cited authors may not be shown...

  17. WHAT IS SPOTLIGHT ? 3. How we define the areas of research? • Not by: disciplines, key words or journals. • By the CO-CITATION ANALYSIS and the yearly creation of the map of science (Klavans & Boyack).

  18. Paper 1 Paper 2 Paper 1 Ref. Paper A Ref. Paper B Ref. Paper A Ref. Paper B Paper 3 Ref. Paper A Ref. PaperB Ref. Paper A Ref. Paper B A and B have a cognitive relationship Strength of relationship proportional to frequency of the co-citation linkage CO-CITATION ANALYSIS: BASED ON TWO ASSUMPTIONS 1 2

  19. CO-CITATION ANALYSIS: BASED ON TWO ASSUMPTIONS 4. What is the base of co-citation analysis? • We group all the papers indexed in SCOPUS during the last 5 years in clusters (approx 90.000) based on their references. • We select the clusters in which our institution has a significant number of papers (compared with the largest competitor world wide - RAS). • We group the selected clusters in competencies based on the references of the papers published by our institution

  20. SAME CLUSTERS; DIFFERENT GROUPINGS = DISTINCTIVE COMPETENCIES • Athena University’s map • DC 1 = clusters C, D & E • EC 2 = cluster B • Einstein University’s map • DC 1 = cluster A • EC 2 = clusters B, C & D

  21. SciVal Spotlight – Research Portfolio Analysis and Optimization • Identify Competencies and Market Strengths • Attract Funding • Spot Interdisciplinary Trends • Strengthen Collaboration • Improve Recruitment and Retention • Use Funds More Strategically

  22. Insight in global strengths COMPUTER SCIENCE MATHS & PHYSICS SOCIAL SCIENCE CHEMISTRY MULTI-DISCIPLINARYRESEARCH AREAS BRAIN RESEARCH ENGINEERING HEALTH SCIENCE EARTH SCIENCE RESEARCH AREAWITH GLOBAL STRENGTH (Competency) BIOLOGY MEDICINE BIOTECHNOLOGY INFECTIOUS DISEASE

  23. Insight in global strengths A larger circle means a larger market size (number of publications) for this Distinctive Competency MULTI-DISCIPLINARYRESEARCH AREAS Each circle represents a Distinctive/Emerging Competency for your institution Circles positioned towards the middle indicate an interdisciplinary mix

  24. VISUALIZATION - MATRIX Question mark Star Market Growth low Dog Cash cow low high Relative Market Share Matrix from the Boston Consulting Group 25

  25. MATRIX VIEW: Distinctive competency performance relative to your largest competitor Find rapidly emerging areas of research; potential areas for further investment Select a view to see in which areas you are growing or reducing market share

  26. The 2009 Spotlight map of University of Zagreb

  27. General Statistics

  28. University of Zagreb 127 (low level) competencies

  29. University of Zagreb 12 high level competencies

  30. Clicking through from high level to low level competencies

  31. Low level competencies within high level competency Medical Specialties

  32. Clicking through to the details of DC1

  33. Looking at the details of DC1

  34. More details on DC1

  35. What are the top authors in DC1? Check the metrics for the most interesting authors

  36. What are the top authors in DC1 from University of Zagreb?

  37. Click on an author, to get more details

  38. What are the top authors in DC1 collaborating with University of Zagreb?

  39. Combining ‘’All authors’’ with ‘’Collaborating authors’’ leads to new potential collaborators

  40. What are the top institutions in DC1? Check the metrics for the most interesting institutions

  41. What are the top institutions in DC1 collaborating with University of Zagreb?

  42. Combining ‘’All institutions’’ with ‘’Collaborating institutions’’ leads to new potential collaborators

  43. Overview of all competencies

  44. Use Case Reaching and Maintaining Leadership

  45. High Level Competency's map of 2009

  46. Reaching and maintaining leadership

  47. Reaching and maintaining leadership

  48. Details of EC 18. Quality indicators

  49. Institutions in EC18

  50. Authors in EC18

More Related