240 likes | 451 Views
Women and Pensions The Impact of Ms. Murphy’s Law Paul Kenny Pensions Ombudsman IWLA Conference, July 2009. What the Pensions Ombudsman Does. Investigate complaints & disputes concerning Occupational pension schemes Personal Retirement Savings Accounts Trust RACs
E N D
Women and PensionsThe Impact of Ms. Murphy’s LawPaul KennyPensions OmbudsmanIWLA Conference, July 2009
What the Pensions Ombudsman Does • Investigate complaints & disputes concerning • Occupational pension schemes • Personal Retirement Savings Accounts • Trust RACs Completely independent office/impartial adjudicator • Can give financial redress • to individuals where they have lost through maladministration of a pension scheme or PRSA • Can decide questions of fact or law
Powers • To require production of information, documents, etc (if not legally privileged) • To examine witnesses, administer oaths • To apply for Circuit Court Order to compel • To State a case to the High Court
Lookback • Lookback depends on when the event happened: • If before 28 April, 2003 to a date not more than 6 years before the 2002 Act • In effect, 13 April 1996 • If after 28 April 2003, either • Six years from the event; or • Three years from the date on which complainant knew, or ought to have known….
Who can Complain? • an actual or potential beneficiary • a member or a former member of a scheme • a surviving dependant of a member who has died • a person claiming to be a member or a surviving dependant • a contributor to a PRSA or Trust RAC • a personal representative of a member or contributor • a widow or widower of a member or contributorwho has died- A complaint may be made through a representative
Against Whom? • Former / trustee • Former / employer • Former / PRSA provider • Other category to be prescribed- regs. • Regulations: “Administrator” includes persons • Providing administration service • To whom S.59 duties delegated • Interpreting or applying scheme rules • To whom PRSA provider has delegated • Regulations not amended for “registered Administrator” (2009) – not required
What can they complain about? • Maladministration (which can be hard to define) in relation to a pension scheme, PRSA. Etc • Financial Loss as a result BUT NOT • Compliance with the Pensions Act (BOARD) • Equal Treatment (Equality Tribunal) • Most self-employed pensions and Disability Plans (FSO)
Internal Disputes Resolution • Complaint in writing to “Relevant Person” • trustees (OPS/Trust RAC) • Minister (Public Authority) • Provider (PRSA) • Determination in writing • Conditions to be met • Trustees can decide structure of IDR procedure appropriate to scheme • IDR result not binding
Exceptions and Waiver • IDR not required if • Scheme in Winding –up • Complaint already heard by Pensions Board • PO decides investigation appropriate AND IDR not appropriate • Process can be “exhausted within its terms” after the expiry of the 3-month deadline or such later date as PO decides
Investigations • Preliminary Examination • Lots of complaints outside Terms of Reference • Referrals to the Ombudsman, Financial Services Ombudsman, Pensions Board, DSFA Pensions, etc • Decision on whether to go for full investigation
Mediation – the Preferred Option • Mediation is faster than full investigation/ determination • Determination invariably means someone is unhappy • Many cases are closed by explanation • Better communication would avert some of these
Investigation Completed • May give “Preliminary View” • Indicate likely conclusions • Invite all parties to comment – deadline • This may alter the course of the investigation • Final Determination • binding on all parties, subject to appeal to the High Court within 21 days
Enforcement, appeals and CriminalProsecution • One appeal dismissed in 2007 • Two appeals ongoing…. • One appeal “settled” - oddly • Prosecutions for obstruction of Investigations • Enforcement of orders to furnish information • Enforcement of Determinations • complainant or Minister
Women and Complaints • Only about 25% of complainants are women • Possibly because under-represented in pension schemes generally • -or because benefits not yet mature
Women and Complaints - 2 • Many complaints by women result from previous discrimination: • Late entry to schemes • Exclusion on marriage in Public Sector • Exclusion of part-timers, seasonal workers, fixed-term contract and temporary staff • Employment and Pensions Legislation now requires equal or pro-rata treatment • Delays in implementation • Maladministration
Maladministration • Calculation and notification of cost of buy-back • Failure to deal properly with spouses’/children’s liability • Failure to deal properly with purchase of added years • Delays in payment /administration of benefits • “Abatement” of pension on return to employment
Dependants’ Benefits • Mortality Benefits not available in CWPS owing to non-remittance of contributions • Impact of discretionary decisions • “wishes” letters • Pension Adjustment Orders – defects • not just in contingent benefits • Orders may not cover all benefits in public service • Interpretation –Relevant benefit in payment
Other Problems • Discrimination in Social Welfare system • Part-timers who contributed to a pension scheme may get a lower unemployment benefit! • Because P60 earnings net of contribution • Not intentional, result of drafting of regulations • Non-Irish nationals and opt-out -can hit dependants • Treatment of “new entrants” to public service
Not all complaints are serious- to start with • Some should never get to my office, but escalate due to • Poor communication – both ways • Lack of knowledge • Failure to take complaint seriously • Example – woman regarded as on “contract for services” – not employee • Help from SCOPE Section • Decision as a matter of fact • Pension awarded
Complaint Handling • How complaints are handled initially will dictate where and how they finish up • It’s important that the complainant feels s/he is being taken seriously • Failure to reply is disastrous
What Happens when a person Complains? • Does the Complaint Handler…. • Lend a sympathetic ear? • Attack the complainant? • Call in the PI Insurer? • Actually look for the facts? • Agree that s/he has a case? • Apologise? • Refer the complainant to IDR?
The Role of the Apology • Remember that sometimes an apology is enough • Complainants need to feel they are being listened to • Failure of the scheme /administrator /trustee to reply will escalate the problem • People who feel they are not taken seriously feel aggrieved • And complain to an Ombudsman • Or sue
Women • Are slow to complain • Are tenacious when they do • Are slow to accept what they don’t understand • Are accepting of a reasoned explanation
Office of the Pensions Ombudsman • 36 Upper Mount Street, Dublin 2 • Telephone: 01 647 1650 • Fax: 01 676 9577 • Web; www.pensionsombudsman.ie • E-mail: info@pensionsombudsman.ie