1 / 7

Placer County

Placer County. MHSA Data Collection. Background on data collection. 2010- Community-driven input for evaluation and reporting requirements on PEI activities 2011- Narrowing of reporting requirements and created first version of documentation

lark
Download Presentation

Placer County

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Placer County MHSA Data Collection

  2. Background on data collection • 2010- Community-driven input for evaluation and reporting requirements on PEI activities • 2011- Narrowing of reporting requirements and created first version of documentation • Spring 2012- Created a model that was consistent across all MHSA activities • Ease administrative burden • Consistency of reporting requirements

  3. Data System Infrastructure • Initially Word Documents • Current System: • Excel Spreadsheets • Used in all MHSA Components • Data is copied into spreadsheets per activity and then compiled into a master for demographics • Future System: • Standardized Satisfaction Surveys • Master sheet for like measures (YOQ, Eyberg, etc.) • Expectation of Validated/Cultural Driven Tools

  4. Interface to data system Process of data collection: • Completed by Provider (county or contractor) • Electronically sent to County Liaison • Merged into Master Spreadsheet Uses of data: • County Evaluation Team • Community Planning Process • EQRO and other audits

  5. Content of data reports Based on 3 Quadrant Model • What/How much do we do? • How well do we do it? • Is anyone better off? Did we make a difference?

  6. Content of data reports • Quadrant 1- Demographics and Contract Requirements • Unduplicated served • Age Groups • Ethnicity • Primary Language • Gender • Veteran/Active Military • Contract Requirements • Quadrant 2 • Satisfaction Survey • Completion of Services • Quadrant 3 • Measurable outcome (at least one)

  7. Outcomes Is anyone better off? Did we make a difference? • Customized to each activity • Fidelity expected with EBP • Provider holds the hard/individual data • Provider provides the evaluation of the data • Reports change scores/data Limitations • Lack of funding for evaluation • Lack of research and evaluation experience by providers

More Related