1 / 18

South Sudan Nutrition Cluster Performance Monitoring (CCPM) Review Workshop: Preliminary results

Explore the objectives, process, and next steps of the South Sudan Nutrition Cluster Performance Monitoring (CCPM) Review Workshop held on 24th January 2018 in Juba. Gain insight into the cluster's performance, strategies for improvement, and future plans. Understand the importance of accountability, transparency, and partnership within the cluster.

larrymitchell
Download Presentation

South Sudan Nutrition Cluster Performance Monitoring (CCPM) Review Workshop: Preliminary results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. South Sudan Nutrition Cluster Performance Monitoring (CCPM) Review Workshop: Preliminary results 24 January 2018 Juba, Republic of South Sudan South Sudan Nutrition Cluster

  2. Objectives of South Sudan Nutrition CCPM • First CCPM took place in 2014 • Regular CCPM exercises in 2015 and 2016-17; • Ensure efficient and effective coordination • Take stock of what functional areas work well and what areas need improvement • Raise awareness of support needed from the HC/HCT, cluster lead agencies, global clusters or cluster partners • Opportunity for self-reflection • Strengthening transparency and partnership within the cluster • Show the added value and justify the costs of coordination

  3. Remember that CCPM DOES NOT… • Monitor response (service delivery by partners) • Evaluate individual partners or coordinators • Evaluate if/when clusters should be deactivated, merged etc. (Review of the cluster architecture) • Exclude usage of other tools with the same purpose

  4. Process of South Sudan Nutrition CCPM • Step 1, Planning: November 2017 • Step 2, On-line CCPM Survey: December 2017-January 2018. Preliminary report issued XX January 2018 and shared with all cluster partners • Step 3, Cluster analysis and action planning: CCPM Workshop and development of the Action Plan to improve performance – 24 January 2018 • Step 4, Follow-up and Monitoring : Finalisation of the Action Plan, presentation to the HCT/Government, implementation of the Action Plan

  5. South Sudan Nutrition CCPM 2017-2018: Response Rates

  6. Scores and Colour Coding

  7. 1. Supporting Service Delivery

  8. 2. Informing strategic decision-making of the HC/HCT for the humanitarian response

  9. 3. Planning and strategy development

  10. 4. Monitoring and Evaluating Performance

  11. 5. Building national capacity in contingency planning/preparedness.

  12. 6. Undertake robust advocacy

  13. Accountability to affected population

  14. Next Steps for the CCPM 3. Cluster analysis and action planning • In a day meeting, the cluster will discuss and finalise the Cluster Description Report and Coordination Performance Report, and develop an Action Plan. 4. Follow-up and Monitoring • The Cluster will continually review the Final Coordination Performance Report and Action Plan. • The Coordination Performance Report and Action Plan will be presented to the HCT and global cluster, to identify support requirements. • The cluster will continue to monitor the implementation of its Action Plan at regular intervals. 5. Ideally, the cluster should report to the HCT on the progress every quarter.

  15. QUESTIONS?

  16. Group Work The team will divide into four working groups to: • Contextualize the findings of the Preliminary Coordination Performance Report (narrative comment boxes). • Identify actions for improvements for each of the six cluster functions + AAP. • On the basis of these discussions, a Final Cluster Description Report and Final Coordination Performance Report will be produced. Groups: WG1 – cluster functions 1 and 4 WG2 – cluster functions 2 and 3 WG3 – cluster functions 5 and 6 WG4 - AAP

  17. Group work: each group should • Review the performance status of the function (color coded in green/yellow/orange/red, and the more detailed scoring of the various questions related to the function) • Identify what worked well for that function • Discuss possible constraints as well as support requirements for that function • Identify other issues relevant to cluster performance that were not included in the survey • Identify and prioritise any improvements for that function, add inputs from the plenary feedback • Summarise in a Word document

  18. Plenary discussion • Report back in plenary; • Seek feedback and endorsement on the recommendations from each of the working groups for each of the functions • Jointly agree on up to 3-5 priorities follow-up actions to improve performance of any weak core functions (prioritise recommendations, but at least address all functions that are below satisfactory performance). • Identify who is following up on each recommended improvement action and by when. It is important to allocate responsibilities at the meeting. • Identify opportunities, constraints and/or request support, if needed.

More Related