An Assessment of Fibroblast Attachment, Morphology and Phenotypic Expression on the HemCon Chitosan Bandage

1. An Assessment of Fibroblast Attachment, Morphology and Phenotypic Expression on the HemCon� Chitosan Bandage Referencing is inconsistent This is more readable overall than the first one (I lookeda t it too) I would fade out the background pic a little more In the figure legends you refer to fig 1a, b etc � you need to label the pics accordingly. Figure 2 +/- TGF beta stuff is confusing � the point of this is that we see a confirmation in structure in SEM and confocal? In figure 3 you start talking about stuff � tgf beta, plasma coated bandages which have not been discussed. Maybe you you lay out the experimental design somewhere � instead of methods section (which isn�t very helpful??) Two fig on bottom of middle column are not explained � just hanging out! Grapsh on IL8 stuff are not big enough to be readable at 100% Table on autofluorescence stuff is not readable � take it out? Just report what we saw? You need a box around the mouse samples too You need a place for conclusions You have refs which are not on there � for space considerations, make a separate sheet with refs and pin it up next to poster. In general, this should focus on figs and not text. Figs should be bigger. Maybe get rid of legends � just put main points beneath each picReferencing is inconsistent This is more readable overall than the first one (I lookeda t it too) I would fade out the background pic a little more In the figure legends you refer to fig 1a, b etc � you need to label the pics accordingly. Figure 2 +/- TGF beta stuff is confusing � the point of this is that we see a confirmation in structure in SEM and confocal? In figure 3 you start talking about stuff � tgf beta, plasma coated bandages which have not been discussed. Maybe you you lay out the experimental design somewhere � instead of methods section (which isn�t very helpful??) Two fig on bottom of middle column are not explained � just hanging out! Grapsh on IL8 stuff are not big enough to be readable at 100% Table on autofluorescence stuff is not readable � take it out? Just report what we saw? You need a box around the mouse samples too You need a place for conclusions You have refs which are not on there � for space considerations, make a separate sheet with refs and pin it up next to poster. In general, this should focus on figs and not text. Figs should be bigger. Maybe get rid of legends � just put main points beneath each pic