1 / 60

T/TAC 2: Barbara Finn Tabitha Parchment Monisha Tripathy Jocelyn Tyler Nantana Wongtanasirikul

T/TAC 2: Barbara Finn Tabitha Parchment Monisha Tripathy Jocelyn Tyler Nantana Wongtanasirikul. T/TAC Online Presentation. Where we left off… Confirmation/Revisions of Current Design Confirmation of Scope VDOE Representative to Confirm Future Design Decisions.

larue
Download Presentation

T/TAC 2: Barbara Finn Tabitha Parchment Monisha Tripathy Jocelyn Tyler Nantana Wongtanasirikul

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. T/TAC 2: Barbara Finn Tabitha Parchment Monisha Tripathy Jocelyn Tyler Nantana Wongtanasirikul

  2. T/TAC Online Presentation • Where we left off… • Confirmation/Revisions of Current Design • Confirmation of Scope • VDOE Representative to Confirm Future • Design Decisions

  3. T/TAC Online Presentation • Confirmation/Revisions of Current Design • Positive feedback from VDOE • Confirmation of Scope • Scope narrowed to LIP proposal search engine • VDOE Representative to Confirm Future • Design Decisions • Bi-monthly meeting with client

  4. Database

  5. T/TAC Online Presentation • The database team was assigned the task of: • Developing the backend of the ‘School Improvement’ tab • Existing Schema available • ‘School Improvement’ table schema: • Entity/Relationships • Forward thinking • Iterative Rapid Development Process • Analysis • Design • Development • Implementation • Evaluation

  6. T/TAC Online Presentation Analysis:

  7. T/TAC Online Presentation Design:

  8. T/TAC Online Presentation • Re-visited Analysis: • Process communication • Procedure • 7 Section proposal document • Budget Form • Expenditure Accounts • Evaluation Rubric

  9. T/TAC Online Presentation Development:

  10. T/TAC Online Presentation Development: Category = Proposals table Sub-Category = Proposals table Goal = Section1 table Region = School table School type = School table School division = School table TTAC region = School table

  11. T/TAC Online Presentation Implementation: http://atlab.gmu.edu/lip/index.htm

  12. T/TAC Online Presentation Implementation:

  13. T/TAC Online Presentation • Evaluation: • No spell check • Small input boxes • No formatting available

  14. Front-End

  15. T/TAC Online Presentation Flowchart

  16. T/TAC Online Presentation

  17. T/TAC Online Presentation Iterative Development • Rapid prototyping method • Cross-checking, reworking of prototype drafts • Approval and collaboration with clients Tools Used: PowerPoint HTML

  18. T/TAC Online Presentation First Draft Phase: Advanced Search

  19. T/TAC Online Presentation

  20. T/TAC Online Presentation

  21. T/TAC Online Presentation

  22. T/TAC Online Presentation

  23. T/TAC Online Presentation

  24. T/TAC Online Presentation

  25. T/TAC Online Presentation

  26. T/TAC Online Presentation

  27. T/TAC Online Presentation

  28. T/TAC Online Presentation

  29. T/TAC Online Presentation Fourth Draft Phase: Advanced Search http://immersion.gmu.edu/ttac/spring2004/group2/NewPrototype/new/school.html

  30. T/TAC Online Presentation Front-End Development • Category Search • Keyword Search • Advanced Search HTML draft: http://immersion.gmu.edu/ttac/spring2004/group2/NewPrototype/new/school.html

  31. T/TAC Online Presentation Iterative Development • Rapid prototyping method • Meetings with Pat • Cross-checking of iterative drafts Tools Used: PowerPoint HTML

  32. Formative Evaluation

  33. T/TAC Online Presentation Formative Evaluation is used to: • To identify the strengths and weaknesses while they are still in the development stage of design • To verify the completeness of the information • To determine if users can easily locate information

  34. T/TAC Online Presentation Evaluation School Improvement Page: • The purpose of this formative evaluation is to get a complete assessment of the prototype in order to confirm and/or advance the initial design of the local improvement plan data search system

  35. T/TAC Online Presentation Evaluation Strategy Small Group Expert Review Formative Evaluation Self-Evaluation One-to-One

  36. T/TAC Online Presentation Expert review: The purpose of our expert review is to verify that the content is correct, the design is proceeding in the right direction, and that the categories and terms are clear,

  37. T/TAC Online Presentation • Expert Reviewers: Dr. Michael Behrmann, Dr. Patricia Abrams, Dr. Shuangbao Wang. • Methods used: (1) notes, (2) questionnaire , and (3) interviews

  38. T/TAC Online Presentation One to one: The purpose of this stage of evaluation is to verify the program's responsiveness, and flexibility.

  39. T/TAC Online Presentation • One to One Reviewers: Various volunteers • Methods used: (1) tests and (2) field notes

  40. T/TAC Online Presentation Self-Evaluation: The purpose of this stage of evaluation is to verify the program's responsiveness, and flexibility. To check for errors.

  41. T/TAC Online Presentation • Self-Evaluation: TTAC 2 • Methods used: (1) tests and (2) notes

  42. T/TAC Online Presentation Small group: The purpose of small group evaluation is to check how well the instruction works with more varied learner, and to see how well the instruction teaches without the designer’s intervention

  43. T/TAC Online Presentation • Small Group: Technical Assistants from the Virginia Department Of Education • Methods Used: (1) tests, (2) field notes, (3) questionnaires, and (4) observation.

  44. T/TAC Online Presentation Expert Review

  45. T/TAC Online Presentation • How might you use this system in your work? • What should we consider in the design of the system to ensure that TAs can search for information easily? • What should we consider in the design of the system to ensure that the public can find information easily?

  46. T/TAC Online Presentation What is your overall opinion of the system? • Dr. Behrmann: You guys have really done a great job. I am pleased. You are on target . • Dr. Pat Abrams: The system is friendly to use and easy to follow.

  47. Usability

  48. T/TAC Online Presentation Purpose of usability testing: • To verify if the system provides all the performance support tools that the users require to perform a given task. (i.e. print, email, download etc.) • To verify that the format, categories, and navigation of the website are organized correctly. • To verify the ease of use and understanding of the three search options intended to help the user locate specific information on local improvement projects/state-operated programs

  49. T/TAC Online Presentation Usability testing methods: • Expert review • One to one • Self evaluation • Small group

  50. T/TAC Online Presentation Usability Schedule: Feb 11,04 - Determine test audience. Begin recruitment for usability Feb 23, 04 - Write first version of script; construct test tasks / scenarios; schedule practice tests March 03 to March 26, 04– expert review, one to one, self evaluation of prototype March 29, 04 – Small group usability testing at Richmond, VA March 30 to April 15, 04 – Combined analysis, wrote recommendations, presented changes to the programmer

More Related