610 likes | 755 Views
Lectures in Istanbul Hiroyuki Sagawa, Univeristy of Aizu June 30-July 4, 2008. 1 . Giant Resonances and Nuclear Equation of States 2 . Pairing correlations in Nuclear Matter and Nuclei. Giant Resonances and Nuclear Equation of States. Istanbul,Turkey, June 30, 2008.
E N D
Lectures in IstanbulHiroyuki Sagawa, Univeristy of AizuJune 30-July 4, 2008 • 1. Giant Resonances and Nuclear Equation of States • 2. Pairing correlations in Nuclear Matter andNuclei
Giant Resonances and Nuclear Equation of States Istanbul,Turkey, June 30, 2008 ---nuclear structure from laboratory to stars---- H. Sagawa, University of Aizu • Introduction • Incompressibility and ISGMR • Neutron Matter EOS and Neutron Skin Thickness • Isotope Dependence of ISGMR and symmetry term of Incompressibility • Summary
Various excitation mode of finite nucleus (spin x isospin x multipolarity) IV(Isospin) mode IS mode n p Spin-Isospin mode Spin mode p n
Density Functional Theory self-consistent Mean Field Shell Model Ab Initio Three-body model Nuclear matter Theory: roadmap 126 82 r-process protons 50 rp-process 82 28 20 50 8 28 neutrons 2 20 8 2 Neutron matter
Theoretical Mean Field Models Skyrme HF model Gogny HF model +tensor correlations RMF model RHF model +pion-coupling, rho-tensor coupling Many different parameter sets make possible to do systematic study of nuclear matter properties.
Physical properties of the infinite nuclear matter by the parameters of Skyrme interaction
Parameter sets of SHF and relativistic mean field (RMF) model Notation for the RMF parameter sets Notation for the Skyrme interactions
Nuclear Matter SHF RMF
Nuclear Matter EOS Supernova Explosion Isoscalar Giant Monopole Resonances Isoscalar Compressional Dipole Resonances Incompressibility K Self consistent HF+RPA calculations Self consistent RMF+RPA (TD Hatree) calculations
Self-consistent HF+RPA theory with Skyrme Interaction • Direct link between nuclear matter properties and collective • excitations • 2. The coupling to the continuum is taken into account properly • by the Green’s function method. • 3. The sum rule helps to know how much is the collectivenessof obtained states. • 4. Numerical accuracy will be checked also by the sum rules.
Tamm-Dancoff Approximation(TDA) Random Phase Approximation(RPA) p-h phonon operator Fermi Energy RPA equation
RPA Green’s Function Method Unperturbed Green’s function The inverse operator equation can be solved as where and
(355MeV) (217MeV) (256MeV)
K=217MeV for SkM* K=256MeV for SGI K=355MeV for SIII
Youngblood, Lui et al.,(2002) (Gogny interaction)
Nuclear Matter EOS Isoscalar Monopole Giant Resonances Isoscalar Compressional Dipole Resonances Incompressibility K (G. Colo ,2004) (Lalazissis,2005) What can we learn about neutron EOS from nuclear physics? Neutron surface thickness Pressure of neutron EOS Neutron star ~10km Size ~10fm sizedifference ~
Giant Resonances and Nuclear Equation of States Istanbul,Turkey,June 30, 2008 ---nuclear structure from laboratory to stars---- H. Sagawa, University of Aizu • Introduction • Incompressibility and ISGMR • Neutron Matter EOS and Neutron Skin Thickness • Isotope Dependence of ISGMR and symmetry term of Incompressibility • Summary
Mt. Bandai UoA Lake Inawashiro
Neutron Star Masses The maximum mass and radii of neutron stars largely depend on the composition of the central core. Hyperons, as the strange members of the baryon octet, are likely to exist in high density nuclear matter. The presence of hyperons, as well as of a possible K-condensate, affects the limiting neutron star mass (maximum mass). Independent of the details, Glendenning found a maximum possible mass for neutron stars of only 1.5 solar masses (nucl-th/0009082; astro-ph/0106406). Figure: Neutron stars are complex stellar objects with an interior Figure: Neutron star masses for various binary systems, measured with relativistic timing effects. The upper 5 systems consist of a radio pulsar with a neutron star as companion, the lower systems of a radio pulsar with a White Dwarf as companion. All the masses seem to cluster around the value of 1.4 solar masses. All these results seem to indicate that the presently measured masses are very close to the maximum possible mass. This could indicate that neutron stars are always formed close to the maximum mass. J.M. Lattimer and M. Prakash, Sience 304 (2004)
Neutron Matter AV14+3body
J= Volume symmetry energy J=asym as well as the neutron matter pressure acts to increase linearly the neutron surface thickness in finite nuclei.
Pigmy GDR GDR (p,p)
Model independent observation of neutron skin Electron scattering parity violation experiments Polarized electron beam experiment at Jefferson Lab. ---- scheduled in summer 2008 --- Sum Rule of Charge Exchange Spin Dipole Excitations
Future experiments Polarized electron scattering (Jafferson laboratory) More precise (p,p’) experiments (RCNP)
Multipole decomposition analysis MDA 90Zr(n,p) angular dist. ω= 20 MeV 0-, 1-, 2-: inseparable DWIA DWIA inputs • NN interaction: • t-matrix by Franey & Love • optical model parameters: • Global optical potential • (Cooper et al.) • one-body transition density: • pure 1p-1h configurations • n-particle • 1g7/2, 2d5/2, 2d3/2, 1h11/2, 3s1/2 • p-hole • 1g9/2, 2p1/2, 2p3/2, 1f5/2, 1f7/2 • radial wave functions … W.S. / RPA
Multipole Decomposition (MD) Analyses (p,n)/(n,p) data have been analyzed with the same MD technique (p,n) data have been re-analyzed up to 70 MeV Results (p,n) Almost L=0 for GTGR region(No Background) Fairly large L=1 strength up to 50 MeV excitation at around (4-5)o (n,p) L=1 strength up to 30MeV at around (4-5)o Results of MDA for 90Zr(p,n) & (n,p) at 300 MeV(K.Yako et al.,PLB 615, 193 (2005)) L=0 L=1 L=2
Neutron skin thickness Sum rule value ⇒ Neutron thickness e scattering & proton form factor
Isoscalar and Isovector nuclear matter properties and Giant Resonances Istanbul, Turkey, June 30, 2008 ---nuclear structure from laboratory to stars---- H. Sagawa, University of Aizu • Introduction • Incompressibility and ISGMR • Neutron Matter EOS and Neutron Skin Thickness • Isotope Dependence of ISGMR and symmetry term of Incompressibility • Summary
Isovector properties of energy density functional by extended Thomas-Fermi approximation
Parameter sets of SHF and relativistic mean field (RMF) model Notation for the RMF parameter sets Notation for the Skyrme interactions
Parameter sets of SHF and relativistic mean field (RMF) model Notation for the RMF parameter sets Notation for the Skyrme interactions