130 likes | 217 Views
ILO Maritime Labour Convention 2006. The Seafarers’ Bill of Rights – a Union View. Mark Dickinson General Secretary. Introduction. Background Original objectives Basic structure Innovations Nautilus perspective Implementation Issues
E N D
ILO Maritime Labour Convention 2006 The Seafarers’ Bill of Rights – a Union View Mark Dickinson General Secretary
Introduction • Background • Original objectives • Basic structure • Innovations • Nautilus perspective • Implementation Issues • Articles/Definitions/Exclusions/Issues for the future • Conclusions
Background • ILO Review of all instruments 1997> • Joint Maritime Commission 2001 • Level paying field • Safety, Environment & Social Conditions • The 4th pillar of global regulation alongside SOLAS; MARPOL; STCW & now MLC 2006
Original Objectives • All-encompassing single instrument • Incorporating in so far as possible all relevant standards • Easily updateable • Drafted in easily understandable language • Attractive to ratify to secure widest possible acceptability • Easily monitored and enforced in order to establish level playing field
Basic Structure Articles Fundamental principles and rights Employment and social rights Procedural and final clauses New amendment procedure Tripartite Committee • Regulations • Substantive rights and obligations (Articles and Regulations establish framework of basic obligations) • Code A and B (details for the implementation of the Regulations: mandatory standards and non-mandatory guidelines that can’t be ignored)
One-stop shop Clear set of principles and rights and employment and social rights for seafarers Simplified amendment procedure Special Tripartite Committee A strong enforcement regime, backed by a certification system for compliance with the Convention No more favourable treatment clause for ships of non-ratifying Members Innovations
Nautilus Perspective • Tripartism & social partnership • Meaningful dialogue & consultation • Employment and social rights for non-domiciled seafarers • Effective jurisdiction and control over ships • Pragmatic & flexible approach
Implementation Issues • Flexibility & substantial equivalence • Tripartism • Definitions (shipowner/seafarer) • Exclusions (geographical/sector etc.) • Minimum wages for seafarers • EU standards (Social Partnership Agreement) • One-stop shop not piece meal
Articles Often overlooked – but V Important! • Art. I & V – “give complete effect” • Art. II – Definitions seafarer, shipowner etc. • Art. III & IV – “fundamental rights” • Art. VI Regulations inc. “substantial equivalence” • Art. VII – Consultation • Art. XIII – Special Tripartite Committee
Definitions – Article II • 1.(f) seafarer “…any person who is employed or engaged or works in any capacity onboard a ship..” • 1. (i) ship “.. A ship other than one which navigates exclusively in inland waters or waters within, or closely adjacent to sheltered waters….” • 1. (j) shipowner “…the owner..or other organisation…who has assumed the responsibility…” • 4. Ships must be ordinarily engaged in commercial activities. Excludes fishing, warships, dhows & junks.
No exclusions? • All seafarers covered. ILO MLC Resolution is NOT carte blanche • Convention has global reach but excludes certain sheltered waters etc. • All sectors included inc. Tugs and Large Yachts • No general exclusion by size of ship. All covered but may need to be over a specific size for some purposes – e.g. 500gt for DMLC • Crew Accommodation – existing ships excluded
Future amendments? • Equality issues – maternity/paternity; harassment & bullying; attracting more women into the industry • Fair treatment of seafarers – criminalisation • Permanent employment • Study leave • Trainee accommodation • Compensatory leave • Action on fatigue (hours of work/rest; manning levels) • Piracy • Welfare; Health
Conclusions • MLC 2006 hugely significant • Objectives achieved • Level playing field/EU key • Flexibility within reason • Only justifiable exclusions • Full involvement of social partners • One-stop shop approach • Decent Work for Seafarers > continual improvement required