500 likes | 799 Views
Risk and Return: The Basics. Stand-alone risk Portfolio risk Risk and return: CAPM/SML. What is investment risk?. Investment risk pertains to the probability of earning less than the expected return. The greater the chance of low or negative returns, the riskier the investment.
E N D
Risk and Return: The Basics • Stand-alone risk • Portfolio risk • Risk and return: CAPM/SML
What is investment risk? • Investment risk pertains to the probability of earning less than the expected return. • The greater the chance of low or negative returns, the riskier the investment.
Probability distribution Firm X Firm Y Rate of return (%) -70 0 15 100 Expected Rate of Return
Investment Alternatives Prob. T-Bill A B C Economy Mkt Port. Recession 0.1 8.0% -22.0% 28.0% 10.0% -13.0% Below avg. 0.2 8.0 -2.0 14.7 -10.0 1.0 Average 0.4 8.0 20.0 0.0 7.0 15.0 Above avg. 0.2 8.0 35.0 -10.0 45.0 29.0 Boom 0.1 8.0 50.0 -20.0 30.0 43.0 1.0
Why is the T-bill return independent of the economy? Will return the promised 8% regardless of the state of the economy.
Do T-bills promise acompletely risk-free return? • No, T-bills are still exposed to the risk of inflation. • However, not much unexpected inflation is likely to occur over a relatively short period.
Do the returns of A and B move with or counter to the economy? • A: With. Positive correlation. Typical. • B: Countercyclical. Negative correlation. Unusual.
Calculate the expected rate ofreturn on each alternative ^ k = Expected rate of return n k = SkiPi. ^ i = 1 ^ kA = (-22%)0.10 + (-2%)0.20 + (20%)0.40 + (35%)0.20 + (50%)0.10 = 17.4%.
^ k A 17.4% Market 15.0 C 13.8 T-bill 8.0 B. 1.7 A appears to be the best, but is it really?
What’s the standard deviationof returns for each alternative? s = Standard deviation .
( ) ( ) 2 2 8.0 - 8.0 0 . 1 + 8.0 - 8.0 0 . 2 1/2 ( ) ( ) 2 2 s = + 8.0 - 8.0 0 . 4 + 8.0 - 8.0 0 . 2 T - bills ( ) 2 + 8 . 0 - 8 . 0 0 . 1 . sT-bills = 0.0%. sB = 13.4%. sC = 18.8%. sM = 15.3%. sA = 20.0%.
Prob. T-bill C A 0 8 13.8 17.4 Rate of Return (%)
Standard deviation (si) measures stand-alone risk. • The larger the si , the higher the probability that actual returns will be far below the expected return.
Coefficient of Variation (CV) Standardized measure of dispersion about the expected value: Std dev s CV = = . ^ Mean k Shows risk per unit of return.
B A 0 sA = sB , but A is riskier because larger probability of losses. s = CVA > CVB. ^ k
Portfolio Risk and Return Assume a two-stock portfolio with $50,000 in A and $50,000 in B. ^ Calculate kp and sp.
Portfolio Return, kp ^ ^ kp is a weighted average: n ^ ^ kp = Swikw. i = 1 ^ kp = 0.5(17.4%) + 0.5(1.7%) = 9.6%. ^ ^ ^ kp is between kA and kB.
Alternative Method Estimated Return Economy Prob. A B Port. Recession 0.10 -22.0% 28.0% 3.0% Below avg. 0.20 -2.0 14.7 6.4 Average 0.40 20.0 0.0 10.0 Above avg. 0.20 35.0 -10.0 12.5 Boom 0.10 50.0 -20.0 15.0 ^ kp = (3.0%)0.10 + (6.4%)0.20 + (10.0%)0.40 + (12.5%)0.20 + (15.0%)0.10 = 9.6%.
1 / 2 2 ( ) 3.0 - 9.6 0 . 10 2 ( ) + 6 . 4 - 9 . 6 0 . 20 2 ( ) s = + 10 . 0 - 9 . 6 0 . 40 = 3.3%. p 2 ( ) + 12 . 5 - 9 . 6 0 . 20 2 ( ) + 15 . 0 - 9 . 6 0 . 10 3.3% CVp = = 0.34. 9.6%
Returns Distribution for Two Perfectly Negatively Correlated Stocks (r = -1.0) and for Portfolio WM Stock W Stock M Portfolio WM . . . . 25 25 25 . . . . . . . 15 15 15 0 0 0 . . . . -10 -10 -10
25 25 15 15 0 0 -10 -10 Returns Distributions for Two Perfectly Positively Correlated Stocks (r = +1.0) and for Portfolio MM’ Stock M’ Portfolio MM’ Stock M 25 15 0 -10
What would happen to theriskiness of an average 1-stockportfolio as more randomlyselected stocks were added? • sp would decrease because the added stocks would not be perfectly correlated but kp would remain relatively constant. ^
Prob. Large 2 1 0 15
sp (%) Company Specific Risk 35 18 0 Stand-Alone Risk, sp Market Risk 10 20 30 40 2000+ # Stocks in Portfolio
As more stocks are added, each new stock has a smaller risk-reducing impact. • sp falls very slowly after about 40 stocks are included. The lower limit for sp is about sM = 18%.
Stand-alone Market Firm-specific = + risk risk risk Market risk is that part of a security’s stand-alone risk that cannot be eliminated by diversification. Firm-specific risk is that part of a security’s stand-alone risk which can be eliminated by proper diversification.
By forming portfolios, we can eliminate about half the riskiness of individual stocks (35% vs. 18%).
If you chose to hold a one-stock portfolio and thus are exposed to more risk than diversified investors, would you be compensated for all the risk you bear?
NO! • Stand-alone risk as measured by a stock’s sor CV is not important to a well-diversified investor. • Rational, risk averse investors are concerned with portfolio risk, and here the relevant risk of an individual stock is its contribution to the riskiness of a portfolio.
There can only be one price, hence market return, for a given security. Therefore, no compensation can be earned for the additional risk of a one-stock portfolio.
CAPM( Capital Asset Pricing Model) Conclusion: • The relevant riskiness of an individual stock is its contribution to the riskiness of well-diversified portfolio. • CAPM links risk and required rate of return
The concept of beta, “b” • Beta measures a stock’s market risk. It shows a stock’s volatility relative to the market. • Beta shows how risky a stock is if the stock is held in a well-diversified portfolio.
_ ki Illustration of beta calculations: Regression line: ki = -2.59 + 1.44 kM ^ ^ . 20 15 10 5 . Year kM ki 1 15% 18% 2 -5 -10 3 12 16 _ -5 0 5 10 15 20 kM -5 -10 .
Find beta • “By Eye.”Plot points, draw in regression line, get slope as b = Rise/Run. The “rise” is the difference in ki , the “run” is the difference in kM . For example, how much does ki increase or decrease when kM increases from 0% to 10%?
Calculator. Enter data points, and calculator does least squares regression: ki = a + bkM = -2.59 + 1.44kM . r = corr. coefficient = 0.997. • In the real world, we would use weekly or monthly returns, with at least a year of data, and would always use a computer or calculator.
If beta = 1.0, average risk. • If beta > 1.0, stock riskier than average. • If beta < 1.0, stock less risky than average. • Most stocks have betas in the range of 0.5 to 1.5.
Can a beta be negative? • Yes, in theory, if a stock’s returns are negatively correlated with the market. Then in a “beta graph” the regression line will slope downward. • In the “real world,” negative beta stocks do not exist.
_ b = 1.29 ki A 40 20 b = 0 T-Bills _ kM -20 0 20 40 -20 B b = -0.86
Use the SML to calculate the required returns. • Assume kRF = 8%. • Note that kM = kM is 15%. (From market portfolio.) • RPM = kM - kRF = 15% - 8% = 7%. SML: ki = kRF + (kM - kRF)bi . ^
Required Rates of Return kA = 8.0% + (15.0% - 8.0%)(1.29) = 8.0% + (7%)(1.29) = 8.0% + 9.0% = 17.0%. kM = 8.0% + (7%)(1.00) = 15.0%. kC = 8.0% + (7%)(0.68) = 12.8%. kT-bill = 8.0% + (7%)(0.00) = 8.0%. kB = 8.0% + (7%)(-0.86) = 2.0%.
Expected vs. Required Returns ^ k k A 17.4% 17.0% Undervalued: k > k Market 15.0 15.0 Fairly valued C 13.8 12.8 Undervalued: k > k T-bills 8.0 8.0 Fairly valued B 1.7 2.0 Overvalued: k < k ^ ^ ^
SML: ki = 8% + (15% - 8%) bi . ki (%) SML . A . . kM = 15 kRF = 8 C . T-bills . B Risk, bi -1 0 1 2
Calculate beta for a portfolio with 50% A and 50% B bp = Weighted average = 0.5(bA) + 0.5(bB) = 0.5(1.29) + 0.5(-0.86) = 0.22.
The required return on the A/B portfolio is: kp = Weighted average k =0.5(17%) + 0.5(2%) =9.5%. Or use SML: kp= kRF + (kM - kRF) bp =8.0% + (15.0% - 8.0%)(0.22) =8.0% + 7%(0.22) =9.5%.
If investors raise inflationexpectations by 3 percentage points, what would happen to the SML?
Required Rate of Return k (%) D I = 3% New SML SML2 SML1 18 15 11 8 Original situation 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
If inflation did not change but risk aversion increased enough to cause the market risk premium to increase by 3 percentage points, what would happen to the SML?
After increase in risk aversion Required Rate of Return (%) SML2 kM = 18% kM = 15% SML1 18 15 D MRP = 3% 8 Original situation Risk, bi 1.0
Has the CAPM been verified through empirical tests? • Not completely. That statistical tests have problems which make verification almost impossible.
Investors seem to be concerned with both market risk and total risk. Therefore, the SML may not produce a correct estimate of ki: ki = kRF + (kM - kRF)b + ?