1 / 9

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. The Use of Research Funding Databases for Research Assessment Information Systems. Presented at the 8th international Conference on Current Research Information Systems

lavada
Download Presentation

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft The Use of Research Funding Databases for Research Assessment Information Systems Presented at the 8th international Conference onCurrent Research Information Systems May 11-13th, 2006 in Bergen, Norway Daniel Bovelet, German Research Foundation (DFG) Department of Information Management DFG www.dfg.de

  2. 1 Agenda Page 2 of 9 Agenda • Short Introduction into research assessment systems and the DFG Funding Ranking • Development of Research Assessment Information Systems based on research funding databases DFG 8th international Conference on Current Research Information Systems (2006 in Bergen, Norway)

  3. 2 Research Assessment Systems and the DFG Funding Ranking Page 3 of 9 Idea of Research Assessment Systems Systems of research assessment, such as ranking exercises, are internationally discussed as important strategic management tools for publicly funded research institutions and, more than ever, are becoming determinants for research policy decision-making processes. Idea: • To give information on research activity and quality of research institutions • To inform about the disciplinary research profile of these institutions • To inform about regional research clusters and networks in science New approach of the DFG Funding Ranking • The research indicators are primarily derived from process produced databases covering funding processes of research funding agencies • No surveys, no biliometric data – „only“ funding! History of the DFG Funding Ranking • First Ranking in 1997 DFG funding instruments and programmes • Second Ranking 2000 new: regional aggregation of data • Third Ranking 2003 new: networks in science new: several other indicators based on heterogeneous research funding databases • Fourth Ranking 2006 => Extended Version: new indicators, detailed analysis of 14 research areas DFG 8th international Conference on Current Research Information Systems (2006 in Bergen, Norway)

  4. 3 Developement of a CRIS based on the DFG Funding Ranking Page 4 of 9 Research Assessment Information System covering 14 research areas Institutional Reports - Geographical Information Systems - Network Analytical Representations integration research indicators The different properties of funding databases can be used for the derivation of research indicators suitable for the representation of the research activities and achievements of research institutions differentiated by several units of analysis (e.g. scientific disciplines) derivation of indicators consolidation of heterogeneous databases unique framework for the subject classification concordance/classifications for institutional codes standardization process Research Funding Databases (DFG funding & reviewers, AvH, DAAD, Bund, EU, StatBund) DFG 8th international Conference on Current Research Information Systems (2006 in Bergen, Norway)

  5. 3.1 Data sources and the need of standardization processes Page 5 of 9 STANDARDIZATION research area classifications institutional classifications research funding and infrastructural data research institution research area HETEROGENEOUS RESEARCH FUNDING DATABASES Federal Statistical Office Government Other Research Councils DFG International Organisations Foundations Business and Industry DFG 8th international Conference on Current Research Information Systems (2006 in Bergen, Norway)

  6. 3.2 Institutional reports Page 6 of 9 Characteristics Example for institutional reports • Enable comprehensive information on the parameter values of the research indicators • Several indicators can be examined in an overall context for each research institution • For the representation and interpretation of the respective values, the relation to a specific benchmark (e.g. by using ranking groups) should be taken into consideration • The information system is additionally able to provide qualitative information on the institution and its infrastructure (e.g. titles of funded research programmes) Figure on the University of Munich • The report offers information on three goups of research indicators: financial capital structure, the human resources and indicators suituable for the representation of the internationality • The research indicators can be differentiated according to scientific discipline or research funding programmes... DFG 8th international Conference on Current Research Information Systems (2006 in Bergen, Norway)

  7. 3.3 Geographic Information Systems Page 7 of 9 Characteristics Example for cartographical representations • Using a GIS in the context of several types of research indicators provides perspectives on the various research institutions and surrounding regions with their scientific infrastructure • The figures provide insight into the research regions and enable regional focal points to be identified • Several levels of analysis can be displayed for different indicators, such as an overall view for Germany, distributions for the federal states, or allocation by administrative districts Figure on allocations of DFG approvals • The data is processed in such a way that conclusions are drawn according to administrative rural and urban districts • A district code is assigned to each institution implemented in the research institution directory and standardized (address) database • For institutions located at multiple locations, each site is allocated ist own code DFG 8th international Conference on Current Research Information Systems (2006 in Bergen, Norway)

  8. 3.4 Network Analytical Representations Page 8 of 9 Characteristics Example for Network Analytical Representations • The network or relationship structures between research institutions can be visualized in the form of network analytical representations • The graphs can be analysed in the following way • institutions that are central to the structure are positioned centrally • institutions that interact frequently are positioned close to each other • the line thickness indicates the frequency of interaction between two institutions • the diameter of circles represents the total number of interactions Figure on DFG coordinated programmes • The relationship structure results from joint participation of institutions in DFG coordinated programmes • The figure shows the core network in biology DFG 8th international Conference on Current Research Information Systems (2006 in Bergen, Norway)

  9. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Thank you for your attention! More Infos at www.dfg.de/ Daniel Bovelet, Department of Information Management Daniel.Bovelet@dfg.de DFG www.dfg.de

More Related