This lecture: Big Picture / Endnote Introduction University Library 2004

1. This lecture: Big Picture / Endnote IntroductionUniversity Library 2004 • What we did up to now • Introduction (Geography, Catalogue, Facilities) • Bibliographic skills (PubMed) • “Big Picture”: Information Cycle • Endnote • One more specific information source: Web of Science • SFX ? • Questions

2. Library Introduction • Geography of the Library, Learning Resource Center • Catalogue • Collection • Facilities • Getting to know the ‘Micro-environment’ for Problem-Based Learning

3. Bibliographic Skills • Database of “references” • Specific subject area • Not restricted to one location : ‘Worldwide’ • Extended abstracts, meta-information • Interface: specific, sophisticated search tools • Getting to know the ‘Macro-environment’ for Problem-Based Learning: the real world

4. pain

5. Free text pain

6. Free text pain • Boolean operators: AND OR NOT • Sets, History #7 AND #13 • Truncation: behavio* or: behavio? • Details: pain vs “pain” • Limits • Display…. • ….Send to: clipboard, text, file, • Keywords (e.g.: Medical Subject Headings)

7. Free text pain

8. Free text pain MeSH database

9. Free text pain MeSH database Neurologic manifestations broader terms related terms narrower terms Geriatrics Pain Longevity Back pain Facial pain Headache Neuralgia Sciatica

10. Information Cycle

11. Information Cycle

12. Information Cycle ACTIVITIES

13. Information Cycle design & carry out experiment ACTIVITIES

14. Experimental data Information Cycle design & carry out experiment ACTIVITIES

15. Experimental data Information Cycle design & carry out experiment Evaluate, write ACTIVITIES

16. Experimental data Manuscript Information Cycle design & carry out experiment Evaluate, write ACTIVITIES

17. Experimental data Manuscript Information Cycle design & carry out experiment Evaluate, write ACTIVITIES

18. Experimental data Manuscript Information Cycle design & carry out experiment Evaluate, write ACTIVITIES Peer review

19. Experimental data Manuscript Publication Information Cycle design & carry out experiment Evaluate, write ACTIVITIES Peer review

20. Experimental data Manuscript Publication Information Cycle design & carry out experiment Evaluate, write ACTIVITIES Bibliographic description Peer review

21. Experimental data Manuscript Publication Information Cycle design & carry out experiment Evaluate, write ACTIVITIES Information data-base & search engine Bibliographic description Peer review

22. Experimental data Manuscript Publication Information Cycle design & carry out experiment Subjectsearch Evaluate, write ACTIVITIES Information data-base & search engine Bibliographic description Peer review

23. Manage ‘relevant’publications Experimental data Manuscript Publication Information Cycle design & carry out experiment Subjectsearch Evaluate, write ACTIVITIES Information data-base & search engine Bibliographic description Peer review

24. Manage ‘relevant’publications Experimental data Manuscript Publication Information Cycle Read, design & carry out experiment Subjectsearch Evaluate, write ACTIVITIES Information data-base & search engine Bibliographic description Peer review

25. Manage ‘relevant’publications Experimental data Manuscript Publication Information Cycle Read, design & carry out experiment Subjectsearch Evaluate, write ACTIVITIES Information data-base & search engine Bibliographic description Peer review Publisher

26. Manage ‘relevant’publications Experimental data Manuscript Publication Information Cycle Read, design & carry out experiment Subjectsearch Evaluate, write ACTIVITIES Information data-base & search engine Bibliographic description Peer review Library Publisher

27. Academic Manage ‘relevant’publications Experimental data Manuscript Publication Information Cycle Read, design & carry out experiment Subjectsearch Evaluate, write ACTIVITIES Information data-base & search engine Bibliographic description Peer review Library Publisher

28. Manage ‘relevant’publications Experimental data Manuscript Publication Information Cycle Read, design & carry out experiment Subjectsearch Evaluate, write ACTIVITIES Information data-base & search engine Bibliographic description Peer review

29. Manage ‘relevant’publications Experimental data Manuscript Publication Information Cycle Read, design & carry out experiment Subjectsearch Evaluate, write ACTIVITIES Information data-base & search engine Bibliographic description Peer review Library

30. Finding references retrogradely • Visser, P.J. et al. Medial temporal lobe atrophy…, Journal of Neurology Vol 246, 1999, pp 477-485 [link1] • Method 1. Take a look at the references at the end of this article: • The references are selected by the authors (Visser et al.): a personal, subjective selection • The referenced articles are published before the Visser article. A retrograde effect

31. Finding references prospectively • Visser, P.J. et al. Medial temporal lobe atrophy…, Journal of Neurology Vol 246, 1999, pp 477-485 [link1] or [link2] • Method 2. Open the ‘Web of Science’ Database. Enter the bibliographic data of the relevant article • The Web of Science tracks down and presents you all the articles that cited the article more recently • This way you are NOT dependant on the choice of a few experts

32. Find Databases and Select information • Catalogues • Library Catalogue • Online Contents • Bibliographies • PubMed Medline • Psycinfo • Specific Databases • Web of Science catalogue bibliography other

33. Conclusions Current dietary guidance includes a recommendation for moderate reduction of sodium (Na) intake of US adults to less than 2400 mg (approximately 100 mmol) dissolved in water [H2O] per day. The safety of this recommendation tends to be taken for granted, but questions are raised periodically about possible adverse effects. We evaluated the evidence available to address these concerns. Relevant sources were identified through review of policy documents and a systematic MEDLINE search of articles published between 1984 and mid October 1995. Reviews and commentaries were selected to encompass the spectrum of arguments for or against possible adverse effects.

34. Conclusions Current dietary guidance includes a recommendation for moderate reduction of sodium (Na) intake of US adults to less than 2400 mg (approximately 100 mmol) dissolved in water [H2O] per day (Kumanyika, Sanders, Folkow). The safety of this recommendation tends to be taken for granted, but questions are raised periodically about possible adverse effects (Kumanyika). We evaluated the evidence available to address these concerns. Relevant sources were identified through review of policy documents and a systematic MEDLINE search of articles published between 1984 and mid October 1995. Reviews and commentaries were selected to encompass the spectrum of arguments for or against possible adverse effects (Weinberger, Weinberger, Narhinen, Kumanyika).

35. Conclusions • Current dietary guidance includes a recommendation for moderate reduction of sodium (Na) intake of US adults to less than 2400 mg (approximately 100 mmol) dissolved in water [H2O] per day (1-3). The safety of this recommendation tends to be taken for granted, but questions are raised periodically about possible adverse effects (1). We evaluated the evidence available to address these concerns. Relevant sources were identified through review of policy documents and a systematic MEDLINE search of articles published between 1984 and mid October 1995. Reviews and commentaries were selected to encompass the spectrum of arguments for or against possible adverse effects (1, 4-6). • References • Kumanyika SK, Cutler JA. Dietary sodium reduction: is there cause for concern. Journal of the American College of Nutrition 1997;16(3):192-203.

36. Conclusions • Current dietary guidance includes a recommendation for moderate reduction of sodium (Na) intake of US adults to less than 2400 mg (approximately 100 mmol) dissolved in water [H2O] per day (1-3). The safety of this recommendation tends to be taken for granted, but questions are raised periodically about possible adverse effects (1). We evaluated the evidence available to address these concerns. Relevant sources were identified through review of policy documents and a systematic MEDLINE search of articles published between 1984 and mid October 1995. Reviews and commentaries were selected to encompass the spectrum of arguments for or against possible adverse effects (1, 4-6). • References • Kumanyika SK, Cutler JA. Dietary sodium reduction: is there cause for concern. Journal of the American College of Nutrition 1997;16(3):192-203. How to format ‘in-text-citations’?

37. Conclusions • Current dietary guidance includes a recommendation for moderate reduction of sodium (Na) intake of US adults to less than 2400 mg (approximately 100 mmol) dissolved in water [H2O] per day (1-3). The safety of this recommendation tends to be taken for granted, but questions are raised periodically about possible adverse effects (1). We evaluated the evidence available to address these concerns. Relevant sources were identified through review of policy documents and a systematic MEDLINE search of articles published between 1984 and mid October 1995. Reviews and commentaries were selected to encompass the spectrum of arguments for or against possible adverse effects (1, 4-6). • References • Kumanyika SK, Cutler JA. Dietary sodium reduction: is there cause for concern. Journal of the American College of Nutrition 1997;16(3):192-203. How to format the ‘reference-list’?

38. Conclusions Current dietary guidance includes a recommendation for moderate reduction of sodium (Na) intake of US adults to less than 2400 mg (approximately 100 mmol) dissolved in water [H2O] per day (1-3). The safety of this recommendation tends to be taken for granted, but questions are raised periodically about possible adverse effects (1). We evaluated the evidence available to address these concerns. Relevant sources were identified through review of policy documents and a systematic MEDLINE search of articles published between 1984 and mid October 1995. Reviews and commentaries were selected to encompass the spectrum of arguments for or against possible adverse effects (1, 4-6). References 1. Kumanyika SK, Cutler JA. Dietary sodium reduction: is there cause for concern. Journal of the American College of Nutrition 1997;16(3):192-203. 2. Sanders PW. Salt sensitive hypertension: lessons from animal models. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 1996;28(5):775-782. 3. Folkow B. Critical review of studies on salt and hypertension. Clinical and Experimental Hypertension, part A 1992;14(1-2):1-14. 4. Weinberger MH. Salt sensitivity of blood pressure in humans. Hypertension 1996;27(3 Part 2):481-490.

39. Conclusions Current dietary guidance includes a recommendation for moderate reduction of sodium (Na) intake of US adults to less than 2400 mg (approximately 100 mmol) dissolved in water [H2O] per day (Folkow, 1992; Kumanyika & Cutler, 1997; Sanders, 1996). The safety of this recommendation tends to be taken for granted, but questions are raised periodically about possible adverse effects (Kumanyika & Cutler, 1997). We evaluated the evidence available to address these concerns. Relevant sources were identified through review of policy documents and a systematic MEDLINE search of articles published between 1984 and mid October 1995. Reviews and commentaries were selected to encompass the spectrum of arguments for or against possible adverse effects (Kumanyika & Cutler, 1997; Narhinen & Cernerud, 1995; Weinberger, 1993; Weinberger, 1996). References Folkow, B. (1992). Critical review of studies on salt and hypertension. Clinical and Experimental Hypertension, part A, 14(1-2), 1-14. Kumanyika, S. K., & Cutler, J. A. (1997). Dietary sodium reduction: is there cause for concern. Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 16(3), 192-203. Narhinen, M., & Cernerud, L. (1995). Salt and public health--policies for dietary salt in the Nordic countries. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 13(4), 300-306. Sanders, P. W. (1996). Salt sensitive hypertension: lessons from animal models. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 28(5), 775-782.

40. SFX • PubMed via University Library! • Cancer AND Pollution • #1 AND child*[Title] • First 4 records