240 likes | 1.37k Views
3.2 The Secant Method. Recall Newton’s method. Main drawbacks : requires coding of the derivative requires evaluation of and in every iteration. Work-around Approximate derivative with difference quotient:. Secant Method. Graphical Interpretation. Graphical Interpretation.
E N D
3.2 The Secant Method Recall Newton’s method • Main drawbacks: • requires coding of the derivative • requires evaluation of and in every iteration Work-around Approximate derivative with difference quotient: http://amadeus.math.iit.edu/~fass
Secant Method http://amadeus.math.iit.edu/~fass
Graphical Interpretation http://amadeus.math.iit.edu/~fass
Graphical Interpretation http://amadeus.math.iit.edu/~fass
Convergence Analysis http://amadeus.math.iit.edu/~fass
Proof of Theorem 3.2 http://amadeus.math.iit.edu/~fass
Proof of Theorem 3.2 (cont.) http://amadeus.math.iit.edu/~fass
Proof of Theorem 3.2 (cont.) http://amadeus.math.iit.edu/~fass
Proof of Theorem 3.2 (cont.) http://amadeus.math.iit.edu/~fass
Proof of Theorem 3.2 (cont.) earlier formula http://amadeus.math.iit.edu/~fass
Proof of Theorem 3.2 (Exact order) http://amadeus.math.iit.edu/~fass
Proof of Theorem 3.2 (Exact order) (*): http://amadeus.math.iit.edu/~fass
Proof of Theorem 3.2 (Exact order) http://amadeus.math.iit.edu/~fass
Proof of Theorem 3.2 (Exact order) (cf. Theorem) http://amadeus.math.iit.edu/~fass
Comparison of Root Finding Methods • Other facts: • bisection method always converges • Newton’s method requires coding of derivative http://amadeus.math.iit.edu/~fass
Newton vs. Secant (“Fair” Comparison) http://amadeus.math.iit.edu/~fass
Generalizations of the Secant Method http://amadeus.math.iit.edu/~fass
Müller’s Method http://amadeus.math.iit.edu/~fass
Müller’s Method (cont.) • Features: • Can locate complex roots (even with real initial guesses) • Convergence rate a=1.84 • Explicit formula rather lengthy (can be derived with more knowledge on interpolation – see Chapter 6) http://amadeus.math.iit.edu/~fass