1 / 1

Figure e1: Relative risk (& 95% CI) for subsequent soft tissue sarcoma according to the estimated absorbed radiation dose ( Gy ).

lavey
Download Presentation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Figure e1: Relative risk (& 95% CI) for subsequent soft tissue sarcoma according to the estimated absorbed radiation dose (Gy) Dotted black line indicates fitted linear dose-response for that study. BEIR VII risk models not available. *Reference category for Wong et al (1997) was 0-5Gy rather than 0Gy, which is used for the fitted dose-response, and this accounts for any apparent discrepancy between the categorical estimates and fitted line.**Includes bone and soft tissue sarcomas – for Henderson et al (2012) 60% of cases were soft tissue sarcoma and for Rubino et al (2005) 13 of 14 cases were soft tissue sarcoma. RR for 60Gy dose-category for Henderson et al =114. #Menu-Branthomme et al quadratic model was best fitting and no linear fitted dose-response was reported.

More Related