1 / 69

Sima Dezső Óbudai Egyetem 20 14 május

Mobile boom. Sima Dezső Óbudai Egyetem 20 14 május. (Ver. 1. 2 ).  Sima Dezső, 20 14. Contents. 1. The traditional computer market. 2. The mobile boom. 3. Requirements of mobile devices (tablets, smartphones) - implications. 4. Conclusions. 5. References.

lavi
Download Presentation

Sima Dezső Óbudai Egyetem 20 14 május

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mobile boom SimaDezső ÓbudaiEgyetem 2014 május (Ver. 1.2)  SimaDezső, 2014

  2. Contents 1. The traditional computer market 2. The mobile boom 3. Requirements of mobile devices (tablets, smartphones) - implications 4. Conclusions 5. References

  3. 1. The traditional computer market (1) 1. The traditional computer market Main computer market segments around 2000 Servers Desktops Embedded computer devices E.g. Intel’s Xeon lines AMD’s Opteron lines Intel’s Pentium 4 lines AMD’s Athlon lines ARM’s lines Major trend in the first half of the 2000’s: spreading of laptops (first mobile devices) Main computer market segments around 2005 Servers Desktops Embedded computer devices Laptops E.g. Intel’s Xeon lines AMD’s Opteron lines Intel’s Pentium 4 lines AMD’s Athlon64 lines ARM’s lines Intel’s Celeron lines AMD’s Duron lines

  4. 1. The traditional computer market (2) CAGR 17% CAGR 5% Yearly worldwide sales and Compound Annual Growth Rates (CAGR) of desktops and mobiles (laptops) as seen in 2006 [1] Source: IDC March 2006

  5. 1. The traditional computer market (3) Market positions of leading processor firms in traditional market segments

  6. 1. The traditional computer market (4) Server market revenues by processor type and quarter ($US Billion) – 2003-2012 [14] ≈75 % Intel/AMD IBM POWER/Sun etc. ≈18 % IBM ≈ 7 %

  7. 1. The traditional computer market (5) x86 server market share of Intel and AMD [17] Nehalem-EX DP/MP Penryn MP Penryn DP Core 2 Quad DP Core 2 DP K10 Barcelona MP K10 Shanghai MP K10 Istambul MP K10 Magny Course MP Source: IDC, Mercury Research

  8. 1. The traditional computer market (6) Worldwide PC shipments by quarter, Q2 1999 – Q2 2013 [18]

  9. 1. The traditional computer market (7) Change of quarterly worldwide PC sales and related revenue changes of Intel and AMD [30]

  10. 1. The traditional computer market (8) Market share of Intel and AMD in desktops and traditional notebooks [32]

  11. 1. The traditional computer market (9) Market share of Intel and AMD in desktops and traditional notebooks • Intel’s market share vs. AMD in desktops ≈ 80 %,in notebooks ≈ 85 - 90 %, • thus AMD’s share remains about 20 %in desktops and 10 -15 % in notebooks, [15], [16].

  12. 1. The traditional computer market (10) Global PC shipments by vendor (in million units) [31]

  13. 2. The mobile boom (1) 2. The mobile boom – beginning mainly in 2006 Diversification of mobile devices beginning mainly in 2006 [2] Netbooks: Small sized laptops, i.e. laptops with a screen size of ~ 10” or less)

  14. 2. The mobile boom (2) Spreading of smartphones The birth of smartphones • Smartphones emerged in 2006 with the Blackberry Pearl 8100 design from the • Canadian firm RIM (Research in Motion) [5]. • In 2007 Apple’s iPhone gave a strong momentum for rapid spreading of • smartphones. • Also in 2007 Google’s Android was unveiled and first Android-powered phones • sold in 10/2008 [6].

  15. 2. The mobile boom (3) Rapid increase of smartphone sales in the second half of the 2000’s [4] A: Actual values E: Estimated

  16. 2. The mobile boom (4) 2011/2012 worldwide cellphone/smartphone sales by vendor [7]

  17. 2. The mobile boom (4a) 3Q/2013 worldwide smartphone sales by vendor (in thousand units) [33]

  18. 2. The mobile boom (5) Operating systems of worldwide sold smartphones to end users in 2Q2013/2Q2012 [24] Worldwide Smartphone Sales to End Users by Operating System in 2Q13 (Thousands of Units) Source: Gartner (August 2013)

  19. 2. The mobile boom (6) Operating systems of smartphones 2011/2012/2016 [7]

  20. 2. The mobile boom (7) Remark After the introduction of iPhone (2007) Steve Ballmer (CEO of Microsoft) said in an interview [20]: “There's no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance… But if you actually take a look at the 1.3 billion phones that get sold, I'd prefer to have our software in 60% or 70% or 80% of them, than I would to have 2% or 3%, which is what Apple might get”.

  21. 2. The mobile boom (8) Intel’s market share in the worldwide smartphone market Intel entered the smartphone market in 1/2010 at the CES while announcing their Moorestown platform running under given versions of Moblin (Intel’s Linux alternative), MeeGo(Intel’s and Nokia’s Linux-based OS) or Android. Although Intel quoted a few reference designs, actually no signs of shipping Moorestown-based smartphones could be found on the internet. Subsequently, Intel introduced a number of enhanced platforms, such as • the Medfield platform (01/2012) • the Lexington platform (01/2013) and • the Clover Trail+ platform (02/2013) and • the Merrifield platform (06/2013) The Medfield platform did not brought Intel the expected success, in 1H2012 Intel achieved a unit shipment share in smartphones of only 0.2% [29]. Nevertheless, Intel’s subsequent platforms and first of all their 22 nm Silvermont- based Merrifield platforms to be available in Q1 2014, give Intel hopes to achieve a much higher share on the smartphone market.

  22. 2. The mobile boom (8a) Intel’s tablets an smartphones roadmap from 11/2013 [] http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/171682-medfield-two-years-in-what-killed-intels-mobile-phone-ambitions/2

  23. 2. The mobile boom (8b) Intel’s acquisitions to accelerate LTE technology (LTE (Long Term Evolution) 4G standard for wireless communication of high-speed data for mobile phones. 8/2010: Intel announces their plan to acquire Infineon Wireless Solution Business 8/2013 Intel acquires Fujitsu Wireless Business

  24. 2. The mobile boom (9) Emergence of tablets Visioning tablets Tablets were envisioned by Steve Jobs already in 1983 saying ”Apple’s strategy is really simple. What we want to do is we want to put an incredibly great computer in a book that you can carry around with you and learn how to use in 20 minutes. ... And we really want to do it with a radio link in it so you don’t have to hook up to anything and you’re in communication with all of these larger databases and other computers” [19].

  25. 2. The mobile boom (10) Designs leading to rapid spreading of tablets around 2010 From 2009 on: Android-based tablets arrived the market from many vendors. 2010: Apple’s iPad with 9.7 “ touch screen and Wi-Fi or additionally wireless 3G broadband internet connection (mobile internet connection), operating under iOS [12]. Figure: Steve Jobs introducing the iPad in 2010 [12]

  26. 2. The mobile boom (11) Implementation alternatives of tablets [8]

  27. 2. The mobile boom (12) Rapid increase of tablet sales in the first half of the 2010’s Besides smartphones, touchscreen tablets including a number of design alternatives that provide partly also keyboard/mouse input (like convertibles and hybrids) have recently the highest growth potential, as indicated in the Figure below (12/1012) [3]. Tablets Notebooks Desktops Figure: Yearly worldwide sales figures of desktops, notebooks and tablets [3]

  28. 2. The mobile boom (13) Expected growth in tablet sales from 2010 [27]

  29. 2. The mobile boom (14) Worldwide tablet and PC (portable and desktop) sales [25]

  30. 2. The mobile boom (15) Market share of the top 5 worldwide tablet vendors Q2 2012 – Q2 2013 [25]

  31. 2. The mobile boom (16) Operating systems used in tablets (Worldwide figures in Q1/2012 and preliminary data for Q1/2013) [9]

  32. 2. The mobile boom (17) Worldwide market share of tablets As the previous Table shows, the worldwide market of tablets is dominated now by Apple’s iPads and Android based tablets, manufactured mainly by Samsung. It is to be mentioned that due to the high sales potential also Intel, AMD and Microsoft entered the tablet market, as indicated below: Table: Overview of Windows-based tablets introduced by Intel, AMD and Microsoft

  33. The fight for low power consumption: Example AMD’s efforts [34]

  34. 2. The mobile boom (18) Market acceptance of Windows-based tablets As shown in the Table before, the market share of Windows tablets in Q1/2013 remains quite low (7.4 %) compared to iOS (48.2 %) and Android-based tablets (43.2 %), it can be stated that until now the market acceptance of Intel’s, AMD’s and Microsoft’s tablets is modest. Nevertheless, according to market research results, in Windows based tablets Intel achieved in Q1 2013 a 90 % market share[28]. Despite the fact that both Intel’s Clover Trail and Bay Trail as well as AMD’s Temash-based tablets have excellent features, market expectations for Windows-based tablets remain modest also in a few years perspective, as the next market estimate for 2016 shows. Source: IDC

  35. 3.Requirements of mobile devices - implications (1) 3. Requirements of mobile devices (tablets, smartphones) - implications Only two aspects discussed: a) Low power operation b) Mobile, touch screen oriented operating systems

  36. 3.Requirements of mobile devices - implications (2) a) Low power operation Contrasting the design paradigms of traditional and mobile processors Traditional processors Tablets and smartphones High performance/power (e.g. GFLOPS/Watt) Low power (Watt) (Number of operating hours) Implications to the microarchitecture of low power CPUs (processor cores)

  37. 3.Requirements of mobile devices - implications (3) Example: Block diagram of Intel’s Cloverview (Z2760) tablet processor (2012) [13]

  38. 3.Requirements of mobile devices - implications (4) Implications to the microarchitecture of low power CPUs-1 a) Low power CPUs need to have “narrow” microarchitectures (e.g. 2-wide) Example: Microarchitectures of ARM CPUs underlying tablets and smartphones [10]

  39. 3.Requirements of mobile devices - implications (5) Microarchitectures of ARM CPUs underlying tablets and smartphones [10] 32-bit 2010 2007 2005 2009 (A9 replacement for low-end devices)

  40. 3.Requirements of mobile devices - implications (6) By contrast typical microarchitectures of recent traditional processors have wide microarchitectures, as the next example shows. Example: Intel’s Core 2 – Haswell processors underlying laptops, PCs and servers 64-bit

  41. 3.Requirements of mobile devices - implications (7) Implications to the microarchitecture of low power CPUs-2 b) Low power CPUs need to have relative low base clock frequencies Traditional CPUs Mobile CPUs High base clock frequency (typically 2-3 GHz) Relative low base clock frequency (typically 1-1.5 GHz) (D = const x fc x V2, in addition higher fc requires higher V)

  42. 3.Requirements of mobile devices - implications (8) Energy-performance tradeoffs of processor architectures Figure: The energy (pJ per instruction) vs. performance tradeoffs in different CPU layouts by jointly optimizing microarchitecture and circuit parameters [23].

  43. 3.Requirements of mobile devices - implications (9) In the Figure the design point • D4 maps 4-wide out-of-order high performance traditional processors operating • at a high clock rate whereas • D2 reflects 2-wide in-order mobile processors operating at a considerable • lower clock rate. Obviously,at the same performance, the design point D2 assures a more power efficient operation than the design point D4,as shown in the next Figure..

  44. 3.Requirements of mobile devices - implications (9a) Energy-performance tradeoffs of processor architectures Figure: The energy (pJ per instruction) vs. performance tradeoffs in different CPU layouts by jointly optimizing microarchitectural and circuit parameters [23].

  45. 3.Requirements of mobile devices - implications (10) Consequences for Intel and AMD Traditional CPUs of Intel and AMD are designed for high performance/power, so they are power hungry, but mobile devices require low power consumption, so traditional microarchitectures of Intel and AMD are not suited for low power constrained mobile devices.

  46. 3.Requirements of mobile devices - implications (11) Foreseeable market situation Market for traditional devices Market for mobile devices Intel/AMD/IBM Apple/Samsung etc. If Intel and AMD wanted to avoid shrinking market shares in the overall processor market and benefit from the rapidly increasing mobile market they need processors that are competitive with ARM designed ones. Intel and AMD were forced • tointroduce novel narrow (e.g. 2-wide) microarchitectures • for their CPUs and • clock them at a relative low rate.

  47. 3.Requirements of mobile devices - implications (12) Intel’s response to the mobile challenge Introduction of the Atom line of processors in 2008, as shown next.

  48. 3.Requirements of mobile devices - implications (13) Evolution of Intel’s basic architectures[2] 2008

  49. 3.Requirements of mobile devices - implications (14) First implementation of the Atom-line of CPUs It was an in-order 2-wide x86-32/64 superscalar clocked at 1.6 GHz. Intel’s first Atom implementation was similar to the ARM Cortex-A8 design, as indicated in the next Figure.

  50. 3.Requirements of mobile devices - implications (15) Basic layout of the microarchitecture of ARM’s Cortex-A family [10] 32-bit 2010 2007 2005 2009 (A9 replacement for low-end devices)

More Related