100 likes | 143 Views
Synopsis of “Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks”*. *Albert-Laszlo Barabasi and Reka Albert, Science, Vol 286, 15 October 1999. Presentation for ENGS 112 Doug Madory Wed, 27 APR 05. Background. Traditional approach - random graph theory of Erdos and Renyi Rarely tested in real world
E N D
Synopsis of “Emergence of Scaling inRandom Networks”* *Albert-Laszlo Barabasi and Reka Albert, Science, Vol 286, 15 October 1999 Presentation for ENGS 112 Doug Madory Wed, 27 APR 05
Background • Traditional approach - random graph theory of Erdos and Renyi • Rarely tested in real world • Current technology allows analysis of large complex networks (Ex: WWW, citation patterns in science, etc)
Barabasi’s Claim • Independent of system and identity of its constituents, the probability P(k) that a vertex in the network interacts with k other vertices decays as a power law, following: P(k) ~ k-g • Existing network models fail to incorporate growth and preferential attachment, two key features of real networks.
Complex network examples Actor collaboration WWW Power grid data Citations in published papers: gcite = 3
Problems with other theories • Erdos-Renyi & Watts-Strogatz theories suggest probability of finding a highly connected vertex (large k) decreases exponentially with k • Vertices with large k are practically absent • Barabasi - power-law tail characterizing P(k) for networks studied indicates that highly connected (large k) vertices have a large chance of occurring and dominating the connectivity
Problems with other theories • Erdos-Renyi & Watts-Strogatz assume fixed number (N) of vertices • Barabasi - real world networks form by continuous addition of new vertices, thus N increases throughout lifetime of network.
Problems with other theories • Erdos-Renyi & Watts-Strogatz - probability that two vertices are connected is random and uniform • Barabasi - real networks exhibit preferential connectivity • New actor cast supporting established one • New webpage will link to established pages
Barabasi’s Experiment • Start with small number of vertices: mO • At each time step, add new vertex with m(<=mO) edges that link new vertex to m previous vertices • Probability P that a new vertex will be connected to vertex i depends on connectivity ki of that vertex P(ki) = ki/Sjkj(Preferential attachment) • Demo in Matlab
The “rich get richer” theory • Similar mechanisms could explain the origin of social and economic disparities governing competitive systems, because scale-free inhomogeneities are the inevitable consequence of self-organization due to local decisions made by individual vertices, based on information that is biased toward more visible (richer) vertices, irrespective of the nature and origin of this visibility.
Summary • Common property of many large networks is vertex connectivities follow a scale-free power-law distribution. • Consequence of two generic mechanisms: (i) networks expand continuously by the addition of new vertices, and (ii) new vertices attach preferentially to sites that are already well connected.