1 / 18

R. Maingi 1 , A. Hubbard 2 , H. Meyer 3 , the Alcator C-MOD, MAST, and NSTX Teams

Office of Science. Supported by. Status of Small ELM Comparison Experiments: Comparison of Small ELMs in Alcator C-MOD, MAST, and NSTX (ITPA PEP-16, XP721). R. Maingi 1 , A. Hubbard 2 , H. Meyer 3 , the Alcator C-MOD, MAST, and NSTX Teams 1 Oak Ridge National Laboratory 2 MIT 3 UKAEA Fusion

lawrencesandoval
Download Presentation

R. Maingi 1 , A. Hubbard 2 , H. Meyer 3 , the Alcator C-MOD, MAST, and NSTX Teams

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Office of Science Supported by Status of Small ELM Comparison Experiments: Comparison of Small ELMs in Alcator C-MOD, MAST, and NSTX (ITPA PEP-16, XP721) R. Maingi1, A. Hubbard2, H. Meyer3, the Alcator C-MOD, MAST, and NSTX Teams 1 Oak Ridge National Laboratory 2 MIT 3 UKAEA Fusion NSTX Results Review Princeton NJ July 23-24, 2007 Page 1

  2. Goals of PEP-16 • Identify similarities and differences between the EDA-H-mode in C-MOD and the Type V ELMy H-mode in NSTX: • Does the same physics govern these regimes (and the HRS-mode on JFT-2M)? • Is the Type V ELMy H-mode specific to ST’s? • Establish dimensionless pedestal comparison with small ELMs between C-MOD, MAST, and NSTX • Match q95 and range in ped* • Perform a scan in ped (and ped*?) to find small ELM thresholds • Compare structure of small ELMs with imaging diagnostics • This XP is ITPA PEP-16 • Follows a successfully completed comparison (PEP-12) which established similarity between C-Mod EDA and JFT-2M HRS regime at higher R/a and identified q95, n* as key parameters. Page 2

  3. Small, irregular ELMs appear in C-MOD on top of EDA H-mode at higher edgeband lower n* Mossessian, PoP 2003 Page 3

  4. k=2.2 d=0.75 Small ELMs appear in wideband n* space in NSTX • Mixed between larger ELMs at highest b Maingi, JNM 2007 Maingi, PoP 2006 Page 4

  5. PEP-16 Status • C-MOD: Some data in ‘06; MP448 planned summer ‘07 • MAST: M6/059 (2 sessions in May 2007) • Mapping of existence space of small ELMs • 5 point power scan 1 MW < PNBI < 3 MW • More data on ELM structure and pedestal parameters • PhD project on inter ELM filaments (N. Ben-Ayed, EPS 2007) • Failed to access regime in L-SN with rsep < -8 mm. • NSTX: XP721 (3 sessions in 2007) •  scan in L-SN (rsep = -6 mm). • 3 point power scan 2 MW < PNBI < 4 MW. •  scan in DN (rsep = -2 mm). • 3 point scan 1 MW < PNBI < 3 MW. • Failed to access H-mode w/rsep < -8 mm (high X-point) •  scan in L-SN (rsep = -15 mm) at higher q95 Page 5

  6. Difficult to reproduce small ELM regime in C-MOD • 4.7 MW RF • bN~1.3 • Pe,ped~19 kPa • Good H-mode • No evident ELMs,why? Page 6

  7. MAST: Small ELMs vanish at high input power • Even with PNBI=1 MW small ELMs are present. • Mixed with threshold Type III ELMs • With PNBI = 3.2 MW small ELMs appear only during early H-mode. • Pressure pedestal seems to be narrow compared to ELM free phases (PEP-9). • Width ~ 1.5%-2.5% of N (half of the width seen in PEP-9) • Higher pressure gradient. Page 7

  8. MAST: No small ELMs at low*and high ped • Small ELMs exist over a wide range in * and ped. • At low power they are mixed with type-III ELMs Page 8

  9. MAST summary • Lower power threshold hard to determine • Small ELMs mixed in between type-III ELMs • Small ELMs disappear at high power and low collisionality * < 1.5 and high pedLFS • High n filaments rotate co-current, not all of them detach. • Larger ELMs: all filaments detach, medium n. • The characteristics seem different from type-V ELMs. • Failed to access H-mode with rsep < -8 mm with  < 1.7 with PNBI < 3.4 MW. Page 9

  10. #123644@0.3s #123645@0.3s NSTX: H-mode access at low  difficult in LSN • No H-mode access at <1.7 with with rsep = -15 mm. • Max PNBI= 6 MW. • No problems at  > 1.9 Page 10

  11. NSTX: Small ELMs observed close to DN drsep ~ -0.3 cm drsep ~ -0.6 cm • Observed between 2 MW < PNBI < 3 MW. • Probably not type-V ELMs, may be similar to MAST small ELMs in DN. Page 11

  12. NSTX (H-mode OK) NSTX (no H-mode) 124656 123644 @ 0.28s 124657 @ 0.22s 124657 124658 NSTX: Power scan with small ELMs in LSN with lower X-point and increased q95 Page 12

  13. NSTX summary • Small ELMs observed only close DN at  ~ 1.8 and high X-point • Small ELMs vanish at high power • These ELMs appear to drift vertically down, in ion grad-B drift direction and opposite to type-V ELMs • Failed to access H-mode with rsep < -8 mm with < 1.7 with PNBI < 6 MW and high X-point • Type V ELMs obtained with lower X-point, rsep ~ -15 mm Page 13

  14. Plans • In discussion: consider re-running XPs on NSTX and MAST with X-point shifted downward, perhaps forgoing the q95 match for a qcyl match • Re-establish small ELMs in C-MOD at higher bN • Report results of ELM structure comparison and edge stability analysis at IAEA 2008 Page 14

  15. Backup Page 15

  16. Background (PEP-12): H-mode operating spaces in q95 vsn* on C-Mod (R/a~3) and JFT-2M (R/a~5) proved very similar C-Mod Hubbard, Kamiya et al, H-mode workshop 2005, Russia • Steady EDA or HRS regime at high n* (> 1.5). • ELMy regime with low Da at low n* (<0.4). • Some overlap in ELM, H-mode types at intermediate n*:‘Mixed’ or EDA+ELM regime at higher b, ELMy at lower b on C-Mod. Page 16

  17. The structure of the small ELMs in this experiment is different from type-V ELMs • Small ELMs: • high mode number, multiple-filaments moving downwards in video • Type-V ELM: • single filament moving upwards in video. • Small ELMs are similar to the ones observed on MAST Type-V ELM Small ELM DN R. Maingi, Phys. Plasmas 13, 092510 (2006) R. Maqueda, PSI-17, to appear in J. Nucl. Mater. (2007) R. Maqueda Page 17

  18. MAST: Small ELMs appear as co-Ip rotating high-n mode Page 18

More Related