1 / 78

Sampling, WLS, and Mixed Models

Sampling, WLS, and Mixed Models. II ESAMP Meetings Nov 6, 2009 Natal, Brazil. Ed Stanek and Julio Singer U of Mass, Amherst, and U of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Finite Population Mixed Models Research Group.

lbarney
Download Presentation

Sampling, WLS, and Mixed Models

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Sampling, WLS, and Mixed Models II ESAMP Meetings Nov 6, 2009 Natal, Brazil Ed Stanek and Julio Singer U of Mass, Amherst, and U of Sao Paulo, Brazil SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  2. Finite Population Mixed Models Research Group Luz Mery Gonzalez, Columbia; Viviana Lencina, Argentina; Julio Singer, Brazil; Silvina San Martino, Argentina; Wenjun Li, US; and Ed Stanek US

  3. Background • Motivation: • 2-stage cluster sample of hospitals • n Hospitals • m Appendectomy operations per hospital • What is the average cost of an operation at a selected hospital (latent value)? • Choices: • Use average cost of m operations for selected hospital • Use ‘shrunk’ cost- regressing to the mean for other sample hospitals. • Which should we use?

  4. Consider/Account for: • Study Design • Sampling • Response Error • Model Assumptions How do we make up models to get better insight from limited information? An Example What is a subject’s saturated fat intake? SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  5. Seasons Study UMASS Worc SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  6. Seasons Study UMASS Worc- focus on 3 subjects SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  7. The Problem-Simplified • Observe: • 1 Measure of SFat on each Subject • Assume: • Response Error (RE) Variance known • Question: • How do we estimate Subject’s True Sat Fat intake? • Begin with a Response Error Model … which leads to…. • Mixed Model • Finite Population Mixed Model Daisy Lily Rose SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  8. Population SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  9. Set Population SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  10. Response 4 11 SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  11. Response 0 11 SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  12. Response 4 9 SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  13. Response 4 11 SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  14. Response 4 9 SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  15. Response 0 11 SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  16. Response…….. 0 11 4 SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  17. Response Error Model for Set SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  18. Summary Response Error Model Latent Value SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  19. Re-parameterized RE Model Mean Latent Value-of what?: or the Set the Population SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 19

  20. Generating Response in the RE Model SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  21. Generating Response in the RE Model SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  22. Generating an Observed Response in the RE Model -1 1 -2 2 -2 -1 SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  23. 9 11 9 11 4 4 0 0 Sample Space • Response Error Model SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  24. 9 11 9 11 4 4 0 0 Response Error Model SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  25. Mixed Model (MM) Random Effect SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  26. Mixed Model (MM) Latent Value SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  27. Mixed Model (MM) in action SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  28. Mixed Model (MM) …. SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  29. Mixed Model (MM) ….?? Who Are They? ? ? SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  30. Mixed Model (MM) ?? ?? What Does it Mean? ? ? SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  31. 8 1 8 3 9 9 11 11 4 4 0 0 12 12 3 1 Sample Space (MM) Artificial Real SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  32. MM-Latent Values? Samples SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  33. What are they (for Daisy)? Samples SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  34. What are they (for Rose)? Samples SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  35. BLUPs of the MM-Latent Value SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  36. MSE of BLUPs for MM-Latent Values Samples Ave=0.986 Ave=3.768 SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  37. MSE of BLUPs |P=y Samples MSE=Ave=0.986 MSE=Ave=3.768 SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  38. Finite Population Mixed Model (FPMM) Population SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  39. Response Error Model Latent Value SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  40. Accounting for Sampling Indicator random variable, 1 if ith Selected sample subject is subject “s”

  41. Finite Population Mixed Model (FPMM) SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  42. Finite Population Mixed Model (FPMM) SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  43. Finite Population Mixed Model (FPMM) SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  44. Finite Population Mixed Model (FPMM) SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  45. 4 11 0 11 4 9 0 9 FPMM- Sample Space …

  46. FPMM- Sample Space … 11 9 9 11 4 0 0 4 SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  47. FPMM- Sample Space … 4 4 -7 13 0 0 13 -7 SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  48. FPMM- Sample Space … 13 13 0 4 -7 -7 4 0 SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  49. FPMM- Sample Space … 11 11 -7 13 9 9 13 -7 SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

  50. FPMM- Sample Space … 13 13 9 11 -7 -7 11 9 SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst

More Related