220 likes | 234 Views
LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY TESTING Lecture # 25. Review of the Lecture. Assessment principles Testing in assessment Types of tests Frequently used test formats. Quotation. Please God may I not fail Please God may I get over sixty per cent Please God may I get a high place
E N D
Review of the Lecture • Assessment principles • Testing in assessment • Types of tests • Frequently used test formats
Quotation Please God may I not fail Please God may I get over sixty per cent Please God may I get a high place Please God may all those likely to beat me get killed in road accidents and may they die roaring. Irish novelist McGahern
Important points to be discussed • Types of language tests • Ways of describing tests • Evaluating the usefulness of language tests • Overview of common language tests: TOEFL, TOEIC, IELTS, and CAEL • Impact of testing on learning and teaching • Critical use of language tests • Testing Questions
Types of Language Tests • Achievement test • associated with process of instruction • assesses where progress has been made • should support the teaching to which it relates • Alternative Assessment • need for assessment to be integrated with the goals of the curriculum • learners are engaged in self-assessment
Proficiency test • aims to establish a test taker’s readiness for a particular communicative role • general measure of “language ability” • measures a relatively stable trait • used to make predictions about future language performance (Hamp-Lyons, 1998) • high-stakes test
Some ways of describing tests Objective Subjective Indirect Direct Discrete-point Integrative Aptitude / Achievement/ Proficiency Performance External Internal Norm-Referenced Criterion-Referenced
Evaluating the usefulness of a language test • Usefulness= reliability+validity+ impact authenticity+interactiveness+practicality (Bachman and Palmer, 1996) Impact Authenticity TEST USEFULNESS RELIABILITY VALIDITY Practicality Interactiveness
Evaluating the usefulness of a language test • Essential measurement qualities • reliability • construct validity : Construct validity is “the degree to which a test measures what it claims, or purports, to be measuring • Evaluation: test taker - test task - Target Language Use (TLU) TLU Test Taker Test Task
Overview of common language proficiency tests ETS, US TOEFL TOEIC UK IELTS CAEL CDN
Test of English as a Foreign Language • One million test takers per year • Three sections: • Listening • Structure and Written Expression • Reading Comprehension • TWE : test of written English
Test of English as a Foreign Language Objective Subjective Discrete-point Integrative Proficiency Achievement • discord between test and understanding of language and communication • passive recognition of language • cutoff scores are very problematic • general proficiency academic proficiency
Test of English for International Communication • TOEFL equivalent for workplace setting • two sections, 200 q. • listening • reading • entertainment, manufacturing, health, travel, finance, etc. • “objective and cost-efficient”
Test of English for International Communication Objective Subjective Discrete-point Integrative Proficiency Achievement • lack of correspondence with TLU • narrow construct • test content is extremely broad
International English Language Testing System • Academic/General • Results reported in band scores 1-9 Listening G.Reading A.Reading G.Writing A.Writing Speaking
International English Language Testing System Objective Subjective Discrete-point Integrative Proficiency Achievement • test tasks reflective of academic tasks • score reporting is diagnostic • need for reliability research
Canadian Academic English Language Assessment • Mirrors language use in university • Topic-based,integrated reading, listening, and writing tasks • provides specific diagnostic information • scores are reported in bands 10-90
Canadian Academic English Language Assessment Objective Subjective Discrete-point Integrative Proficiency Achievement • tests performance and use • diminished gap between test and classroom • validity is supported by teacher evaluations • studies on predicting academic success
Washback: The Impact of Tests on Teaching and Learning • “The power of tests has a strong influence on curriculum and learning outcomes” (Shohamy, 1993) • good test positive washback • form of test impact depends on • antecedent: educational context and condition • process • consequences (Wall, 2000)
Critical Language Testing • Focus on consequence and ethics of test use • Tests are embedded in cultural, educational, and political arenas • whose agenda? • Questions traditional testing knowledge • English proficiency= academic success? • English: got it or get it! • Responsible test use (Hamp-Lyons, 2000)
Testing Questions • What is actually being tested by the test we are using? • What is the”best” test to use? • What relevant information does the test provide? • How is testing affecting teaching and learning behaviour? • Is language testing “fair”?
summary • Types of language tests • Ways of describing tests • Evaluating the usefulness of language tests • Overview of common language tests: TOEFL, TOEIC, IELTS, and CAEL • Impact of testing on learning and teaching • Critical use of language tests • Testing Questions