1 / 26

Forecasting Earthquakes

Understand the difference between earthquake predictions and forecasts, long-term probability estimates, & necessary elements for accurate earthquake prediction. Learn about historical successes, failures, and the development of early warning systems.

lcarol
Download Presentation

Forecasting Earthquakes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Forecasting Earthquakes ・ Difference between Predictions and Forecasts ・ Earlier Efforts in Earthquake Prediction ・ Long-term Probability Estimates

  2. Earthquake Predictions versus Forecasts Predictions have specific times, locations, and magnitudes for future earthquakes. Forecasts are more long-term estimates of earthquake occurences. Often they include probability information.

  3. What is needed in an earthquake prediction ? 1. Time window 2. Location window 3. Magnitude window 4. Indication of confidence 5. Chances earthquake occurs anyways as a random event 6. Prediction must be presented in accessible form for later evaluation Allen, 1996

  4. Optimism in the 1960’s and 1970’s ‘Now, when will earthquake prediction be possible and an efficient Forewarningservice available ? …if we start the project presented here we should be able to answer the question with sufficient certainty within ten years.’ The Japanese Blueprint (Tsuboi et al, 1962) ‘Based on an assessment of worldwide observations and findings over the past few years, it is the panel’s unanimous opinion that the development of an effective earthquake prediction capability is an achievable goal. …with appropriate commitment and level of effort, the routine announcement of reliable predictions may be possible within ten years…’ Panel of the US National Research Council (Allen et al., 1976)

  5. Earthquake Prediction Researchin the 1970’s Distance Measurements on the San Andreas fault Matsushiro strainmeter

  6. ‘Dilatancy’

  7. Prediction of the 1975 Haicheng, China Earthquake (M7.3) Prediction based on foreshocks and animal behavior saved many lives

  8. Scholz et al., 1973

  9. Short-Term Crustal Deformation Precursor Mogi, 1984

  10. Short-Term Electromagnetic Precursor Fraser-Smith, et al., 1990

  11. For short-term precursors, there are currently more ‘negative’ results than ‘positive’results. Johnston and Linde, 2002 Kanamori et al., 1996

  12. Successes and Failures ‘Predicted’ ・1973 Blue Mountain Lake (M2.5) ・1975 Haicheng, China (M7.3) ・1978 Oaxaca, Mexico (M7.7) ・1978 Izu, Japan (6.7) ‘Not Predicted’ ・1976 Tangshan, China (M7.7 650,000 casualties) ・2003 Tokachi-oki, Japan (M7.9) ・2004 Parkfield, California (M6.0)

  13. Earthquake Cycle Periodic Time-predicatable Slip-predicatable Shimazaki and Nakata, 1980

  14. History of Nankai Earthquakes

  15. Trenching ｆaults to find geological evidence of past earthquakes Pallet Creek site on the San Andreas fault

  16. Probability Conditional Probability 100 years

  17. Variability in Repeating Earthquakes Well defined recurrence interval (Small variability) Wide range of recurrence intervals (Large variability)

  18. Probabilistic Earthquake Forecasting for California

  19. “… the Earthquake Research Committee announced on May 24, 2003, there was 10-20 percent chance of occurrence of a M8-class Off-shore Tokachi Earthquake over the next 10 years starting from January 1, 2003, and a 60 percent chance over the next 30 years” Tokachi-oki earthquake September 26, 2004 M8.0

  20. Probabilistic Hazard Maps Proabilistic Earthquake Occurence Attenuation Relations

  21. Japan National Seismic Hazard Maps Probabilty of exceedence 10% in 50 years

  22. USGS National Hazard Maps http://geohazards.cr.usgs.gov/eq/

  23. For an earthquake on the southern San Andreas it would take about 30 sec for the S wave to reach Los Angeles. (The S wave travels at about 18,000 km/h.) This is enough time to issue an Early Warning.

  24. JR ‘500 series’ bullet train can reach peak speed of 300 km/hr

  25. Existing Early Warning Systems UrEDAS SAS (Mexico) Taiwan (EWS) REIS (NIED, JMA) Istanbul, Italy, Greece, Romania plus many other design concepts ElarmS, California

More Related