1 / 26

Risk Management Conclusions

BE-AWARE II Final Conference, 18-19 November, Ronneby, Sweden. Risk Management Conclusions. Co-financed by the EU – Civil Protection Financial Instrument. BE-AWARE Sub-Regions. Ireland and UK. Sub-Region 1: Irish Sea and Atlantic. Relatively low traffic density Oceanic conditions

lclay
Download Presentation

Risk Management Conclusions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. BE-AWARE II Final Conference, 18-19 November, Ronneby, Sweden Risk Management Conclusions Co-financed by the EU – Civil Protection Financial Instrument

  2. BE-AWARE Sub-Regions

  3. Ireland and UK • Sub-Region 1: Irish Sea and Atlantic • Relatively low traffic density • Oceanic conditions • Wind farm developments in Irish Sea • Vulnerability highest in island groups and mudflats

  4. Ranking of scenarios based on cost effectiveness in reducing damage impact • Sub-Region 1: Irish Sea and Atlantic

  5. Sub-Region 1: Irish Sea and Atlantic

  6. AIS alarms/guard rings around wind farms • TSS Extension beyond what is expected to be in place by 2020 • 50 % increase in counter pollution equipment • Sub-Region 1: Risk Management Conclusions

  7. Norway and UK • Sub-Region 2: Northern North Sea • Medium traffic density • Extensive oil and gas developments • Renewable developments • Islands groups and fjords most vulnerable

  8. Ranking of scenarios based on cost effectiveness in reducing damage impact • Sub-Region 2: Northern North Sea

  9. Sub-Region 2: Northern North Sea

  10. Extended Traffic Separation Schemes (TSS) • 50 % increase in response equipment • AIS alarms around wind farms • Improved night detection/visibility equipment • Sub-Region 2: Northern North Sea

  11. Denmark, Germany, Norway and Sweden • Sub-Region 3: Eastern North Sea/Skagerrak • High traffic density to and from Baltic • oil and gas developments further offshore • Wind farm development • Coastal archipelago and Wadden sea areas most vulnerable

  12. Ranking of scenarios based on cost effectiveness in reducing damage impact • Sub-Region 3: Eastern North Sea/Skagerrak

  13. Sub-Region 3: Eastern North Sea/Skagerrak

  14. Extended TSS routes from the coast of Norway and the Skaw towards the Netherlands • VTS close to the North Western Jutland coast • AIS alarms around wind farms • Sub-Region 3: Eastern North Sea/Skagerrak

  15. Belgium, France, Germany, Netherlands and UK • Sub-Region 4: Southern North Sea • High traffic density • oil and gas developments • Extensive wind farm developments • Wadden Sea and Scheldt estuary are most vulnerable

  16. Ranking of scenarios based on cost effectiveness in reducing damage impact • Sub-Region 4: Southern North Sea

  17. Sub-Region 4: Southern North Sea

  18. AIS alarms around wind farms • Improved night detection/visibility equipment • Extended Traffic Separation Schemes • E-navigation • Sub-Region 4: Southern North Sea

  19. France and UK • Sub-Region 5: Channel • High traffic density • Limited wind farm developments • Vulnerability highest along coastal areas

  20. Ranking of scenarios based on cost effectiveness in reducing damage impact • Sub-Region 5: Channel

  21. Sub-Region 5: Channel

  22. AIS alarms around wind farms • Improved night detection/visibility equipment • Extended Vessel Traffic Service (VTS) • E-navigation • Sub-Region 5: Channel

  23. Regional Risk Management Conclusions

  24. Regional Risk Management Conclusions Extended TSS and VTS in North Sea

  25. International Risk Management Conclusions E-Navigation

  26. Thank youbeaware.bonnagreement.org Questions?

More Related